READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — June 17, 2014 — Agenda — reading text
Part 1 of 1. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 108-past Agenda Request-01.07.2014.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: January 7, 2014
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Jeff Littrell
SUBJECT: Arbennie Pritchett WRF Expansion - Engineering RFQ & Review
Committee
DEPARTMENT: Water and Sewer
BCC DISTRICT: All
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: OCWS and Purchasing staff request permission to move forward
with a qualifications based selection process for a contract with an engineering consultant for the
Arbennie Pritchett WRF Expansion Project to serve as the Owner's Representative and Design
Criteria Professional.
BACKGROUND: Construction of the Arbennie Pritchett Water Reclamation Facility (APWRF)
was completed in 2009 and has an annual average daily flow (AADF) capacity of 10 million
gallons per day (MGD). This $65M program with 5 sub-projects was a huge success. The
project was completed within budget and on-time. This state-of-the-art WRF has now been
operating efficiently for about 4 years with parameters well below our state permit requirements.
In addition, the APWRF has been the foundation for many related agreements that have
generated revenue or reduced expenses for the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund: 7th Special
Forces, City of Ft. Walton Beach, Eglin Air Force Beach (Duke Field, Camp Rudder, Main Base,
and the Navy EOD school), and Niceville/Valparaiso (diverting East County flow).
Currently, the actual AADF is approximately 6.3 MGD. With the additional flow of the above-
mentioned projects and other ongoing development, we anticipate being above 8 MGD of actual
AADF in about 2 years. On paper, the capacity reserved is approximately 8.5 MGD. Although
we have about 15% capacity remaining of the average daily flow, this puts us in an
uncomfortable position for the long-term and the short-term during peak flow events, such as
storms or hi-flow summer weekends. Because of this, OCWS has a 5 MGD plant expansion in
our approved 5-year CIP: $2M in FY2014, $8M in FY2015, and $3M in FY2016. Most
importantly, we expect this $13M total to be funded with cash. In account 411-4199-599360,
OCWS has been saving up Capacity Expansion Charges (CECs) that have been received on the
above-mentioned projects and other large projects, such as some of the recent hotels. We
currently have approximately $4.5M in this account and are under contract with Eglin AFB for
another $8.5M, which is expected to be received in the summer of 2014. Staff feels that the
responsible thing to do is fund the 5 MGD needed expansion from the $13M to be in this
account. There is also a desire to proceed with the expansion before the amount of CEC funds
available is rendered insufficient by construction material inflation. Fortunately, the APWRF
was designed and constructed with a future expansion in mind, from 10 MGD to 15 MGD.
Certain components (i.e. head works, UV channels, admin building, etc.) have already been
constructed for 15 MGD AADF, and room on the site has been left available for the needed
expansion (oxidation ditch, clarifier, etc.).
As Okaloosa County did in the late 2000s, when APWRF went through the procurement and
design process, staff is proposing the design-build method of procurement, following Florida
Statues and Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) requirements/guidelines. We feel that
design-build is the best approach to large, high-dollar projects; with 1 company doing both the
design and construction, it avoids finger pointing and potentially litigious situations, thereby
lowering risk to the owner. The bidding process of selecting a design-build (D-B) contractor is
qualifications based. Interested firms would submit both qualifications and bids in separate
envelopes. The most qualified D-B contractor would be selected with the intent to negotiate a
contract. The other set of envelopes would then be opened with their actual bid price.
Negotiation then occurs with the most-qualified bidder until a final price is reached. If a price
cannot be negotiated, negotiations would cease with the most-qualified bidder and commence
with the next-most qualified bidder. This paragraph is just a brief summary of the D-B
procurement process. Staff will come back to the Board in the future to obtain permission to
move forward with the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a D-B contractor.
Currently, staff is requesting permission to issue an RFQ for an engineering consultant to serve
as the Owner's Representative and be the Design Criteria Professional (DCP), as outlined in
Florida Statutes 287.055 (AKA "Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)"). Because
the anticipated amount of this contract exceeds the thresholds listed in this statute, an existing
continuing contract (AKA "master services agreement") cannot be utilized. A new contract will
need to be executed for the professional engineering services necessary to move forward with the
plant expansion. These professional engineering services may include but are not limited to the
following services: owner's representative in procuring and coordinating with D-B contractor;
serve as the Design Criteria Professional; prepare the RFQ (for D-B contractor), the Request for
Proposal (RFP), and the Design Criteria Package (performance specifications and preliminary
engineering); evaluate Statement of Qualifications and bids; perform engineer's cost estimates;
groundwater modeling; permitting; engineering services during construction; resident
observation; develop and manage Owner Purchased Equipment (OPE) program; coordinate
complete system startup; construction administration; perform any miscellaneous engineering
and technical service required in support of the project and specifically requested by the County.
OCWS and Purchasing staff would now like to begin the process of obtaining an engineering
consultant for the APWRF Expansion Project via the formal qualifications based selection
process. If authorized by the Board, OCWS staff will work with Purchasing staff to formulate a
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to begin the formal selection process. In the State of Florida
per the Competitive Consultants Negotiations Act (CCNA), the selection criteria for the award of
engineering contracts are qualifications based.
Staff also recommends the following Review Committee to evaluate the statements of
qualifications received and bring back a recommendation to the Board, regarding which firms to
enter contracts with:
Zan Fedorak or designee - Purchasing Manager (non-voting member to oversee)
Nathan Boyles - Board of County Commissioners, Water & Sewer Liaison
Jeff Littrell - Water & Sewer, Director
Jeb Chessher - Water & Sewer, Project Manager
Darren Alford - Water & Sewer, Wastewater Operations Manager
Jason Autrey - Public Works, County Engineer
OPTIONS: Approve or deny.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff requests BCC approval to move forward with the qualifications
based selection process (via a RFQ) for a contract with an engineering consultant for the
Arbennie Pritchett WRF Expansion Project and approval of the above-mentioned review
committee. A recommendation of award will be brought back to the BCC at a later date.
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Ernie Padgett, County Administrator
