READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — April 27, 2013 — Minutes — reading text
Part 3 of 5. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 104-Minutes Jan 22 2013.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
amendments. After the discussion at the hearing on
January 22, 2013 -10- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
December 18, several changes were made. The most significant
changes to the document include:
• Line 285 – inserted “unattended” and changed “8:00 a.m.” to
“7:30 a.m.”
• Line 385-400 – added new language to drop reference to the
Sheriff’s Department and Code Enforcement and place
responsibility with OCPW and OCPS
• Line 567 – added back in “Last two days of February”
• Line 785 – changed from “8:00 a.m.” to “7:30 a.m.”
Mr. Hofstad said they believe these changes more narrowly define
the ordinance. These modifications will provide a clear time
from midnight until 7:30 a.m. to allow cleaning of the beaches
and allow compliance with the Federal Endangered Species Act to
prevent obstructions during the turtle nesting season from May
through October. He stated they did remove the reference to the
Sheriff’s Department and Code Enforcement regarding enforcement,
and said that would become the responsibility of the Okaloosa
County Public Works and Okaloosa County Public Safety
Departments. Mr. Hofstad said they did not believe adding
personnel to Code Enforcement would be something the Board would
support.
Mr. Hofstad stated the goal of the Public Works and Public
Safety Departments is to implement these ordinance changes
through a comprehensive public awareness campaign. Signage will
be placed at each access point to the Gulf beaches and at the
lifeguard stands. Letters will be sent to each of the county’s
lodging partners requesting assistance with notifying their
patrons upon arrival of these provisions of the ordinance.
Mr. Boyles said the change in unattended items does narrowly
tailor that issue. He felt staff did a good job on that item.
Mr. Richard Young, Niceville, voiced opposition to the 300-foot
limitation for swimming. He said this is an example of
government trying to enforce safety by legislation. Mr. Young
told the commissioners they cannot stop people from doing
foolish things. He said the language does not distinguish
between activities, saying he is a long-distance swimmer. Mr.
Young stated he swims up to five miles each day and the
provisions of the proposed ordinance will be a problem for
fitness buffs. He said he does not want to be punished and some
allowance should be made for the small group of professional
swimmers to register with the lifeguard to swim beyond the 300-
foot mark. Mr. Young also pointed out there is no definition of
January 22, 2013 -11- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
the word “swimmer.” He asked if that refers to anyone in the
water.
Upon inquiry by Mr. Amunds and Mr. Harris, Public Safety
Director Dino Villani nodded in consent of adding the provision
for long-distance/professional swimmers to check in with the
lifeguards before their swims.
Ms. Dori Spelling, President of the Emerald Coast Triathlon
Club, stated they have 100 members and go out typically on
Sundays for long swims. She pointed out they swim in a
responsible manner and would like to be able to continue their
practices. Ms. Spelling said they will also check in with the
lifeguards.
Mr. Al Greenup stated he swims year round and although the
proposed language is well intended, he believes it will bring
consequences. He questioned the ability to enforce the
prohibition against swimming farther than 300 feet from shore
and asked if lifeguards will have arrest authority. Mr. Greenup
cautioned the Board about creating a problem with this provision
of the ordinance.
Mr. Parisot said he wished all swimmers were responsible and had
the courtesy to speak with lifeguards. Mr. Harris said the
measure is for those who cannot exercise common sense or control
when drinking alcohol.
Mr. Amunds felt the document submitted should be amended to
allow professional swimmers to check in with lifeguards for
swimming beyond the 300-foot restriction. He also felt the
Sheriff’s Office and Code Enforcement should be added back as
the enforcement agencies. Mr. Villani recommended the language
to be added be “law enforcement officer.”
Mr. Boyles stated he has looked at rescue data and it indicates
there is one rescue for every 102 hours of lifeguard duty. He
does not think we have reached the level of need to place this
300-foot restriction in the ordinance.
Mr. Parisot said he understands Mr. Villani and Tracy Voss want
to protect the people. He suggested in Section “I” that when
double red flags are flying they fly continuously until the
danger passes. Currently, when lifeguards go off duty the flags
are taken down. Mr. Villani stated the lifeguards make the
judgment call on the flags and if the flags fly continuously
January 22, 2013 -12- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
there could be a perception the lifeguards are still on duty.
Mr. Amunds said if the flags are up, it means the lifeguards are
there.
Mr. Boyles made motion, seconded by Mr. Windes, to adopt the
changes to Ordinance No. 08-06 as presented with the exception
of Paragraph H 3a and 3c which are to be struck and to add “law
enforcement officer” back in for enforcement of provisions. Mr.
Windes noted that our numbers are bouncing back since 2010 and
expressed concern about making the ordinance too stringent. He
said the 300-foot restriction is tough for him to swallow. Mr.
Boyles stated his motion does strike that 300-foot rule.
4 yeas, 1 nay. (Mr. Harris voted no.)
ORDINANCE NO. 13-07
PUBLIC HEARING – FOREST COVE MSBU, INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL
STREET LIGHT (9:00 A.M.)
Mr. Stanford read the advertised legal notice for public hearing
to consider a request to add a street light at intersection of
Forest Cove Court and Church Street in the Forest Cove Municipal
Service Benefit Unit (MSBU).
Mr. John Hofstad, Public Works Director, stated a petition was
received from residents in the Forest Cove MSBU requesting an
additional street light as identified in the legal
advertisement. Sixty percent of the 43 contributing members of
the MSBU supported the additional light; policy requires at
least 51% of the residents to support such a request.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or in opposition to the
request. Mr. Harris made motion, seconded by Mr. Parisot, to
approve the installation of the street light at Forest Cove
Court and Church Street. 5 yeas.
SHERIFF’S OFFICE – REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF LETF DISBURSMENT
Mr. Amunds stated the next item is a resubmittal of a request
from several weeks ago. Major J. D. Peacock, Administrative
Bureau Chief, confirmed this request is a resubmission for a Law
Enforcement Trust Fund (LETF) disbursement of $2,000 for the MLK
2014 annual event as requested by the Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr. Committee.
Mr. Boyles stated he began working with the Sheriff’s Office on
LETF disbursements a few months ago, noting he took the position
January 22, 2013 -13- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
these funds should go toward support of School Resource Officers
(SROs). Mr. Boyles clarified that he believes the bulk of the
LETF should go toward SROs. He said there are submissions for a
number of worthwhile events and we should be fiscally
responsible.
Mr. Boyles proposed $35,000 be set aside each fiscal year in the
LETF and to give the Sheriff a wide latitude in the use of those
funds. However, any funds above this amount for the foreseeable
future would be used for SROs. The requests for use of LETF
funds for charitable and non-profit organizations could then be
moved back to the Consent Agenda. He felt this proposal is a
way to obtain resolution of the issue.
Mr. Amunds felt all requests should come before the Board but
said he does not think every one of those requests has to be
debated at every meeting. He suggested no threshold be set and
asked what would happen if only $20,000 in LETF monies come in.
Mr. Amunds asked Major Peacock if they can come up with a
formula for use of the seized funds, saying maybe a 50/50 split
would be acceptable. Major Peacock replied he does not believe
there is an issue as far as the Sheriff is concerned regarding
the use of State LETF or Federal Equitable Sharing Funds for
SROs, noting that Sheriff Ashley has already committed the bulk
of the funds for SROs. With regard to use of the State LETF, he
said those dollars are not tax-based and the use of them fits
like a glove with overall crime prevention.
Major Peacock stated these programs have been supported over the
years and it would be uncomfortable doing this on a year-to-year
basis. He said the Sheriff’s Office is more comfortable with
Mr. Boyles’ proposal than a designated percentage. Mr. Amunds
reiterated he would be more comfortable with a formula and said
if a threshold is given he would rather have $25,000 than
$35,000.
Mr. Harris commented the crime prevention events are just as
important as SROs because it puts law enforcement in the
community. He also said he likes Mr. Boyles’ perspective on the
issue.
Mr. Parisot said he is very hesitant, saying he does not want to
set a dollar amount. He added that he does not look at who is
making the request for funds but how the money is to be spent.
Mr. Parisot stated there appears to be no change in this
January 22, 2013 -14- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
resubmittal from the previous submission and he cannot support
it today.
Mr. Harris made motion to approve the LETF request submitted by
the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Committee. Motion dies for lack
of a second.
Mr. Boyles made motion to go forward with LETF allocations
within budgeted funds of $35,000 with the Sheriff’s statutory
affirmation of use until a change is made in the procedure and
for the remainder of the LETF to be used in support of SROs.
Mr. Amunds stated this is a new item and cautioned about rushing
into a decision. He did not feel this to be a time sensitive
item and said he is not comfortable voting today. Upon inquiry
by Mr. Amunds, Mr. Dowd responded this is a policy decision at
Board level.
Mr. Boyles commented this topic has been discussed for a while
and his motion stands. The motion was restated: $35,000 of
these LETF Funds can be used with the Sheriff’s affirmation for
donations and other crime preventions events and placed on the
Consent Agenda. Mr. Harris seconded the motion. 3 yeas, 2 nays
(Mr. Amunds and Mr. Parisot voted no.)
Mr. Boyles made motion, seconded by Mr. Harris, to approve the
request for $2,000 submitted by the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Committee for LETF. 4 yeas, 1 nay. (Mr. Parisot voted no.)
HUMAN RESOURCES – INTERNAL AUDITING SERVICES
Mrs. Kay Godwin, Human Resources Director, stated she is present
to ask direction regarding enhanced internal auditing services.
She advised the working group learned there are statutory lines
of authority designating the Clerk of Circuit Court as the
auditor of all county funds. Mr. Dowd provided insight,
specifically dealing with a case where Alachua County created an
internal auditing department to conduct post-audit functions and
the courts found that to be improper although hiring an
independent auditing firm for this purpose would have been
permissible. Options discussed by the working group were:
using an outside firm as opposed to hiring a county employee,
fund another internal auditor within the Clerk’s Office, or hire
an internal auditor for the BCC who would review only policies
and procedures (fraud prevention measures).
January 22, 2013 -15- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County
