READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 05-29-07 special minutes — reading text
Part 3 of 4. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13373-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
comments are
very biased and
does not understand why any disagreements would have culminated in the final two of
days
employment. He stated charter officers need a span of control and the way the Charter is written
they do not have that control.
Mr. Garvie mentioned the difficult environment that Ms. Absher walked into as her
role as Finance
Director in that she did not have guidance as to her
authority or who she answered to. He also
commended the actions of Ms. Absher in the way she handled the former
employee, as she was
only protecting the financial information of the City and had the best interest of the in mind.
City
7
Special Council 5- 29- 07
TERMINATION OF FINANCE DIRECTOR (CONT)
Mr. Minich strongly disagreed with the labeling of the former employee as '
stating she
disgruntled,'
was an excellent employee who served the City well as Chief Accountant as well as
fulfilling some
of the duties of finance director, that gave many hours of service to the City, and that she left as a
result of a better job opportunity.
Mr. Garvie
I""'" countered he was not accusing the employee of any wrongdoing, as he didn' t even
know her; he was merely commending what he felt was a good management policy by Ms. Absher.
Mr. Minich again voiced his disagreement with Mr. Garvie' s comments.
Mr. Miller discussed at length the backup information requested by Mr. Holmes which included
employment information and the exit interview of the former employee. He noted dates and times,
and questioned why an investigation into the accusations against Ms. Absher by the employee was
done a week after the employee left. Mr. Miller voiced his opinion that the events depicted in the
backup information by the former employee were in fact a conspiracy to force the resignation of
Ms. Absher.
Mr. Holmes stressed that he feels this was not a disgruntled employee; he believes she left on her
own accord,stating she worked an extra 'four weeks, outlined her job for her successor, and noted
her many accomplishments that IJI.ere mentioned by Mr. Miller from the backup material.
The Mayor called for a vote on the motion. Dr. Pullen asked that the motion be repeated and
asked for clarification on the vote. Clarification was given that a vote of ' yes' is in favor of
terminating the employment of the Finance Director, Lisa Absher.
Mr. Holmes repeated the motion to terminate the Finance Director, Lisa Absher, tonight at 12: 00
am and include the severance agreement outlined in her resignation letter dated May 18, 2007,
The Mayor noted that Mr. Minich seconded the motion.
The Mayor again called for the vote on the motion and it failed by a vote of 2 to 5 with Holmes and
Minich in favor and Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Pullen, and Hartwell opposed.
DISCUSSION OF CITY/ POLICE AND FIRE PENSION FUNDS
The Mayor advised the following are the combined Items 5 and 7, requested by Mr. Hartwell and
Mr. Miller respectively: Item 5: Consideration of the need to procure an independent agency to
study and report on the different legally acceptable methods for executing the General Employee' s
Retirement fund, and the Police and Fire Pension Funds/ Plans. This study must also examine the
City' s execution of those Funds/ Plans for the past 10 years. Item 7: To review participation and
contribution to the three pension funds: FWB Employees, Fire, and Police.
The Mayor announced that Roberts Rules of Order was waived only for the last agenda item.
Mr. Hartwell expressed concern over reports from the Finance Director and from a citizen that
questionable practices were occurring regarding the General Employees Retirement Fund and the
Police/ Fire Pension Funds, and he felt it was an important enough issue to discuss to make clear
as to whether or not any wrongdoing has occurred. Mr. Hartwell advised he wanted to procure an
independent agency to study and report on the different legally acceptable methods for executing
the General Employees' Retirement Fund, the Police and Fire Pension Funds/ Plans, and that the
study must also examine the City's execution of those funds/ plans for the past 10 years.
Mr. Miller expressed his concern regarding the participation in and contributions to the City's three
pension funds, and advised he wanted to see reports from the professional pension managers
detailing payments from the City and details of the complete tracking of City funding and reporting.
8
Special Council 5- 29- 07
PENSION FUNDS ( CONTI
The City Manager advised the City receives
quarterly reports from professional fund managers for
the General Employees' Pension Fund, with the next report
occurring in June, and that Council can
ask any questions of them at that time.
Mr. Miller feels that an independent agency is not needed; that the Finance Director be directed to
do a full investigation and give a report to Council at their June 12 and then the decision
meeting,
can be made whether or not to hire someone to
o
investigate it further.
Mr. Minich called for a point of order, stating that if Council wants to debate and move forward with
the issue, a motion is needed.
The City Manager provided a detailed explanation regarding the three pension funds,
explaining
that Council serves as the Board of Trustees for the General Employee' s Pension Fund, with an
advisory committee comprised of participants of the funds as dictated by the ordinance
establishing the pension plan. She advised the Fire and Police Pension funds are separate and
governed by State Statute, and they have their own Board of Trustees confirmed by the Council.
The City Manager discussed the contributions of the funds, noting that the Police and Fire Pension
contributions are determined each year by the actuary, who dictates how much is contributed to the
plans. Regarding the Employees Pension Plan, the City engages an actuary who advises how
much the City should contribute to the Plan.
The City Manager stated that in her review of the actuarial required contribution to the General
Employee' s Pension Plan and what the City contributed shows no irregularities whatsoever; the
City deposited into the plans exactly what it said would be deposited. She further explained the
City does not make a determination regarding the percentage of a contribution each year, that is
determined by the actuary during the budget cycle and the percentage is estimated
by the City,
with any remaining funds placed in fund balance.
The City Manager went on record to advise she does not believe there are
any irregularities with
regard to the contributions to these plans, and that the City is looking at selecting a new investment
advisor.
In light of the explanation given by the City Manager, Mr. Hartwell withdrew his
request to procure
an independent agency to study and report on the different legally acceptable methods for
executing the General Employee' s Retirement fund, and the Police and Fire Pension Funds/ Plans.
The Mayor asked for public input. There was none.
Mr. Miller moved to empower the Finance Director to do an
independent analysis of the
Pension Funds, most particularly the Employee Pension Funds in
regards to contributions,
and return to Council with her findings.
Mr. Minich questioned of the Chair whether the Finance Director
already has this power, and if so,
Mr. Miller' s motion is improper as she would not be
doing an independent but an
analysis, analysis.
The Mayor stated he believed the Finance Director did have that
power; she can be tasked to do
an analysis as she is an employee of the City.
The City Attorney informed that the Finance Director has the
power and authority as a fiduciary
duty to the Council, and if she feels there is an issue or something to review or to study or to
commit an inquiry to, she has the power to do that vested in the Charter. The
City Attorney
continued that Council can direct her to do it in a certain amount of time, but she
already has the
power and duties to investigate and to carry out and even more so since she is a member of at
least one of the boards.
9
Special Council 5- 29- 07
PENSION FUNDS { CONTI
Mr. Miller asked the Finance Director how long it would take her to complete the analysis. She
advised the analysis has already been done and the City Manager has had it for at least a month.
Mr. Miller rephrased his motion to direct the Finance Director to present a report on the
status of the General Employees and Police and Fire Pension Funds at the June 12, 2007
t""'-
Council meeting. Mr. Minich seconded motion.
Mr. Holmes advised this is the first he has heard of concerns regarding the pension funds, and
questioned if any of the other members of Council besides Mr. Hartwell were aware of this
situation.
The Finance Director clarified for Mr. Holmes that in a conversation
