READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 09-22-2009 regular — reading text
Part 12 of 12. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-24085-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
areas is minimal on property owners and
therefore does not include a detailed land use analysis.
support of the test and training mission at Eglin. The mis-
sions at the test sites range from Command Centers that
control the activation of flight termination systems for items
7. 3.3 Low Level Helicopter and Tiltrotor Training
being tested ( Test Site A -3) to the launching of surface -to- The low level helicopter and tiltrotor training area covers the
air missiles such as the Air Intercept Missile and the Patriot entire city limits and as a result influences a broad range of
missile ( Test Site A -15). In the airspace above the island land uses. The result of land use in this area may be per-
and seaward for three nautical miles is a Controlled Firing ceived as a nuisance resulting from low level helicopters
Area. Figure 7 -3 also includes the Controlled Firing Areas and tiltrotors flying overhead and increasing sound and
in the Fort Walton Beach Vicinity. These areas are defined having other effects associated with ow flying helicopters
airspace blocks that contain activities that would be poten- and tiltrotors.
tially hazardous to nonparticipating aircraft. 7. 3.4 Radio Frequency Interference
Successful and safe completion of the mission on land and The analysis for radio frequency interference in the City is a
the adjacent waters requires the control of the airspace, simple one. The entire City lies within the 50 -mile buffer
water, and land that are part of the mission scenario. Ac- from Eglin which the Air Force has identified as the area of
cess restriction ensures the safety of people not participat- influence with respect to radio frequency interference.
ing in the mission as well as maintains mission integrity. An example of successful frequency mitigation involves the
Restricting access becomes increasingly problematic as the
number of residents and civilian boat traffic increase. Po-
use of garage door openers. The military negotiated with
Section 7 - FORT WALTON BEACH
O
TETRA TEC H
39-
k,
z
3
S
2
mss;
t
Ho;•:'
a,
y
4 ?`
t! R
x
y
a
i1
gr U ARRIP:
