READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — May 15, 2013 — reading text
Part 28 of 29. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
life, they change it”
Robert C. Gallagher Quotes
<image001.gif><image002.jpg>
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Please note: Due to Florida’s very broad public records laws, most written communications to or from County
employees regarding County business are public records, available to the public and media upon request.
Therefore, this e-mail communication, including your email address, may be subject to public disclosure and
public record retention requirements.
--
Please Note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or
from City of Fort Walton Beach officials are public records available to the public and media
upon request. Your e-mail address and communications may therefore be subject to public
disclosure.
Think Green - Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
--
Please Note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or
from City of Fort Walton Beach officials are public records available to the public and media
upon request. Your e-mail address and communications may therefore be subject to public
disclosure.
Think Green - Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: May 21, 2013
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Don Turner
SUBJECT: Asbestos Policy
DEPARTMENT: Facility Maintenance
BCC DISTRICT: All
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Request BCC approval of a new county asbestos policy.
BACKGROUND: Until 1984, asbestos was a common ingredient in a wide variety of building
materials. Its unique properties made it an almost ideal component for thermal insulation, sound
proofing, and fire proofing as well as chalk boards, flexible boiler breaching, and cementious
roofing tiles among other uses.
It was later discovered that prolonged and/or intense exposure to airborne asbestos fibers resulted
in some people developing asbestos related diseases. After the link between asbestos and some
rare diseases was made, laws were implemented in every state which spelled out how asbestos
containing materials (ACM) were to be handled to protect people of exposure to airborne fibers.
Left alone, most ACM is perfectly safe. In most cases the asbestos is bound up in a matrix with
other materials that make up a composite. Still, asbestos fibers can be released into the air if the
materials are mishandled or removed improperly.
To go further to protect the occupants in and visitors to county facilities, it's in the best interest of
the county to formalize a policy that spells out what must be done before a county building may
be modified in any way. These modifications may take the form of minor or major remodeling,
roof replacement, major systems replacement, flooring repair or replacement, or any number of
activities which may disturb ACM.
The proposed policy centralizes the clearing point through which all building modification
projects must be filtered to ensure proper procedures are followed with regard to the presence of
ACM every step of the way. Following the policy will go much farther to ensure the safety of
staff, citizens, and visitors who come to any of our county facilities.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Request BCC approval of a new county asbestos policy.
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Ernie Padgett, County Administrator
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: May 21, 2013
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Rick Owen
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2014 Revenue Options
DEPARTMENT: County Administrator
BCC DISTRICT: All
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Request the Board continue discussion and offer guidance on
additional revenue source(s) for Okaloosa County's Fiscal Year 2014 Budget.
BACKGROUND: At the BCC Budget Policy Workshop held on April 19, 2013, the Board
discussed projected revenue shortfalls of approximately $4.4 million to offset expenses for the
purpose of ensuring a balanced budget for FY2014. This discussion primarily focused on the use
of the additional 5-cents of local option gas taxes and the use of franchise fees to utility
companies in the unincorporated areas of Okaloosa County. Many of our cities, e.g., Fort Walton
Beach, Crestview, Destin, and Niceville, implemented franchise fees many years ago and use
such as a viable revenue source. Okaloosa County currently does not impose franchise fees,
which can range up to a maximum of 6 percent.
The Board continued discussion, primarily centered on the local option fuel taxes, at the April
16, 2013 and May 7, 2013 regular Board meetings.
Commissioner Parisot has requested the Board continue discussion with regard to franchise fees
as a potential revenue stream.
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Ernie Padgett, County Administrator
Fiscal Challenges (Anticipated General Fund Impacts):
Sheriff Expanded SRO Program $1,742,561
Vehicles & Equipment $1,253,500
Salary Market Adjustments (3%) $1,458,623
Health Insurance (10%) ($ 308,473)
Capital Outlay $ 675,000
Florida Retire System (FRS) $ 678,000*
(*BCC General Fund only, per Kay Godwin, HR)
Medicaid (FAC est. above 2013-new Legislation) $ 103,000
REVISED TOTAL: $5,602,211
FISCAL CHALLENGES:
$ 5,602,211 (estimated GF increased expenses*)
$ 470,000 (estimated GF revenue increases)
$ 5,132,211
oRecommended target reductions/revenue enhancements of
4.4% or $5,132,211 of Anticipated General Government Services.
oBased upon projected Assessed Valuation that would equate to
.422 millage increase (Would produce $5,132,211added revenue)
* Include a 3% employee salary adjustment and other factors from
previous page.
Fellow Okaloosa County Commissioners: May 15, 2013
RE: Franchise Fee Discussion
During the Budget Policy Workshop of April 9, 2013, the County Administrator
addressed projected increased expenditures for our FY2014 Budget along with
some potential sources of revenue to address the projected increases in
expenses. (See attached charts labeled Fiscal Challenges which I have updated to
include the FRS estimate from Kay Godwin and our projected FY2014 increase in
Medicaid billings.)
One of the potential revenue sources we briefly discussed was imposing
franchise fees on utility companies for their use of our County lands and rights-
of-way for their product distribution networks, primarily the electric and natural
gas utilities. Most of our nearby counties have established franchise fees as a
revenue stream. Within Okaloosa County, at least four of our municipalities
(Fort Walton Beach, Crestview, Niceville, and Destin) have established these
franchise fees. The utility companies having been using our lands and rights-of-
way without paying for these uses for decades.
At the Budget Policy Workshop, it was estimated that each 1- percent of
franchise fee would generate approximately $1.25 million of new revenue. The
maximum franchise fees permitted is 6 percent; thus, franchise fees have the
potential to create $7.5 million of new revenue. Such fees would only apply to
utilities servicing the unincorporated areas of the County.
In addition to the estimated shortfall of revenue, other areas of concern
discussed most recently have been ways to increase revenues available for our
badly needed increased infrastructure funding for road and stormwater projects,
both of which have been on the Commissioners’ priorities in our Strategic Plan
for years, but, due to limited revenues during tough economic times we have
not increased the revenue stream for these projects. In fact, we have reduced
the funding for both of these areas, very often by shifting revenues to balance
the budget. We are also all aware that in the areas of replacing critical
equipment, vehicles, information technology, employee compensation, and
other areas, we have “kicked the can down the road” to the point that it is
having very negative impacts on the capabilities of our Departments to provide
the services needed and desired by our citizens.
A potential way to address many of our anticipated needs of the “Fiscal
Challenges” identified at the Budget Policy Workshop as well as funding sources
for roads and establishing a Stormwater Utility is via franchise fees.
A way of increasing the near-term availability of revenues is to leverage a
designated income stream through bank loans or bonding. In this regard, I have
been in contact with Mr. Mark Galvin of First Southwest Company to get
estimates of various levels of bank loans/bonding and the amounts of revenues
and debt service that would be required for various time periods, i.e., 10 years,
15 years, 20 years, and 30 years. The four attached charts labeled “Okaloosa
County, Florida ,New Money Capacity Analysis” show the estimated revenue
available and the annual debt service for four different levels of debt service
($1,250,000; $1,000,000; $750,000; and $500,000). Each of the four charts
shows the amount of borrowing/bonding we could do for four different periods
of time. For example, the first chart shows that we could acquire $10,565,000
via bank loan with an annual debt service of $1,249,200 for 10 years, or,
$15,444,792 via bonding with annual debt service of $1,250,000 for 20 years.
The ensuing charts show similar data for the other levels of annual debt service.
How would the franchise fees provide revenues to address the above budget
issues? We could dedicate by County Resolution and Ordinance that a 1%
franchise fee be dedicated to Roads (approx. $1,250,000 annually) and a 1%
franchise fee be dedicated to establish a Stormwater Utility (approx. $1,250,000
annually). The remaining percents of franchise fee (up to a maximum of 4%)
could be allocated to the General Fund (1% would produce approx. $1,250,000;
2% approx. $2,500,000; 3% approx. 3,750,000, and 4% approx. $5,000,000).
By keeping the Road funding from the General Fund at current levels, with a 1%
franchise fee we could borrow/bond from $10,565,000 to $19,404,000 for
current projects by using the entire $1,250,000 for debt service.
As far as a Stormwater Utility using a 1% franchise fee, per John Hofstad his
current annual personnel and operating expenses (i.e., no project money) is
approx. $750,000. Using the $1,250,000 to cover these annual expenses would
leave $500,000 available for annual debt service. From Mr. Galvin’s charts,
annual debt service of $500,000 would provide from $4,170,000 (10-years) to
$7,641,020 (30-years) for stormwater projects. In the current FY2013 budget,
we are using $400,000 from the General Fund for stormwater personnel and
operating expenses. By establishing a Stormwater Utility using a 1% franchise
fee, we could use this $400,000 to offset our projected expenditure increases in
FY2014. (This would reduce the revenue shortfall as shown on the “Fiscal
Challenges” charts from $5,602,211 to $5,202,211.) Please remember that
without a Stormwater Utility we are not very competitive for State and Federal
funding and grants as these often require a funding match. Such grants are
another way of expanding our availability of funding for projects.
The remainder of any franchise fees could go to the General Fund. However, I
would propose that we limit the percents of franchise fees to the General Fund
to 2% ($2,500,000) or to 3% ($3,750,000) maximum. Two percents of franchise
fee would reduce the projected revenue shortfall on the “Fiscal Challenges”
charts from $5,202,211 to $2,702,211 and 3% would reduce it to $1,452,211. If
we
