READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 06-12-2007 regular agenda — reading text
Part 10 of 17. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13463-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - BROWN & BROWN. INC.
Authorize the City Manager to execute a release agreement
regarding the settlement agreement
entered into between the Florida Department of Financial Services, the Florida
Department of
Legal Affairs, Office of the Attorney General, the Office of Insurance Regulation, and Brown &
Brown, Inc.
PUBLIC HEARING
ORD. 1720 - FIRST READING
The City Attorney read the ordinance by title.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA;
PROVIDING FOR
AUTHORITY; ADDING SECTION 10. 521 ENTITLED " INAPPROPRIATE DISCHARGE
DETECTION AND ELIMINATION INTO STORMWATER SYSTEM" TO VOLUME II, CODE
OF
ORDINANCES; ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF POLLUTANTS BY
STORMWATER DISCHARGE BY ANY USERS, AND TO PROHIBIT INAPPROPRIATE
CONNECTIONS TO THE MS4; RESOLVING CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; DETERMINING
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
John Hofstad, Utilities Director, explained the ordinance will
satisfy one of the elements the City
must satisfy to comply with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) permit
and it will set the guidelines to administer the
program, monitor the pollutant discharges, prohibit
and stop them.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. As there was no one who wished to speak the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Miller moved to adopt Ord. 1720 on first
reading. Mr. Garvie seconded motion and it
carried unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, and Pullen in favor ( Hartwell
absent).
PUBLIC HEARING
ORD. 1724- PERMIT FLAG POLES UP TO 200' AS CONDITIONAL USE
The City Attorney read the ordinance by title.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR
AUTHORITY; AMENDING CHAPTER 12. 731 HEIGHT AND AREA EXCEPTIONS OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO PERMIT FLAG POLES UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF TWO
HUNDRED ( 200) FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL AS A CONDITIONAL USE; RESOLVING
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Len Mitchell, CDS Long- Range Planning Manager, went over the
background of the request from
Eglin 99 to amend the Land Development Code to add flag poles as conditional use in order to
install a landmark 170' flag pole at Uptown Station as a tribute to the area' s
military personnel. He
explained staff's intention to propose that flag poles be Permitted as accessory uses for those
within the height and setback limits within their zoning district, and to
propose for exceptional flag
poles taller than the zoning districts, that the conditional use approach be applied and heard before
the Municipal Planning Board Public Hearing. He reported the Ex- Officio member who
represented the Eglin AFB Mission Enhancement Office presented the Air Force' s position on tall
flag poles and suggested three criteria be included in any ordinance that went forward.
Regular Council 5- 22- 07
291
ORD. 1724 cont.
Mr. Mitchell went over the three criteria suggested by Eglin as follows: 1). the ordinance should
clarify maximum height should be no more than 200 feet above ground level and avoid a 200 foot
flag pole on top of an existing structure; 2) the ordinance must not allow a cluster of flag poles; one
flag pole will not impact the military mission; however, a cluster of oversized poles will create a tall
and wide radar and visual/ optical instrumentation impairment and recommended verbiage to state
a density limit of no more than 1 over- sized pole within a given 1 mile grid- square; and 3) the
ordinance must require FAA approval prior to flag- pole installation; for example, FAA and/ or FCC
regulations require lighting and alternating color striping on towers at 200 feet. He mentioned the
l
ordinance before Council has two provisions; first, that flag poles would be permitted uses as
accessory structures in each zoning district subject to the height and setback requirements
applicable to any accessory structure; and second, pursuant to provisions of Chapter 12. 94, flag
poles up to a maximum of 200 feet above ground level may be considered and authorized as a
conditional use in the following zoning districts: all commercial districts, all industrial districts, all
mixed- use districts, all redevelopment districts, and in planned unit developments. He said the
ordinance is drafted to deal with those flag poles that are not taller than the maximum height in
each zoning district and the proposed additional language would amend the chapter in the
supplemental regulations regarding height and area exceptions by adding a section regarding flag
poles that would state flag poles are permitted as accessory structures. He said staff feels this is
the best way to approach the issue and noted the Municipal Planning Board voted 3 to 4 in
opposition to the particular version of the ordinance; however, as part of the due process it is
before Council for consideration.
Jay Odom, owner of Uptown Station, discussed his request for an amendment to the Code to allow
tall flag poles as a conditional use and explained the reason for his request is because he wants to
do something special and different tha.t can be a statement. He mentioned the military has said
flag poles up to 200 feet are not a problem as long as they are not clustered; that the City currently
has an ordinance that allows communication towers up to 500 feet; and he showed pictures of
towers that currently exist in the City that are taller than the height he is asking be approved for a
flag pole. He addressed a few issues that may raise questions. He addressed the question
whether the change in the ordinance would allow a proliferation of tall flag poles advertising
businesses in Fort Walton Beach and said it is not possible as the current ordinance of the City
prohibits the flying of any advertising on a flag pole because it is considered a sign and the only
thing that can be flown on the flag poles would be a country or a state flag. He said he would
voluntarily restrict his to an American flag. He addressed the potential concern that the ordinance
allowing tall flags poles could be parlayed into allowing tall buildings to be built and said that is not
possible to parlay the ordinance into something that would say it is a precedent to allow tall
buildings. He said he has no intention of, and will commit to, that he has no interest in building any
buildings in the City of Fort Walton Beach higher than what the current code allows. He mentioned
the City Attorney has said the ordinance is the correct approach. He said if the City felt it was
necessary either in the ordinance or in the approval list of the ordinance, he would encourage to
put in strict criteria of 200' setbacks from property lines, potentially 400' setbacks from residential,
the military approval which said they have no problem up to 200' above grade, no advertising of
any kind, approved by the FAA, and only 1 flag pole for every square mile. He commented the
change in the ordinance will not allow any flag poles and it will require a specific submittal for a
specific site for a specific project to go through a process to be reviewed an approved. He
J suggested, because of the interest in height in the City, that they may want to require that the final
approval in the process come back to Council for approval. He showed drawings of Uptown
Station and the potential location of the flag pole within the central park site. He requested Council
approval of the ordinance.
The question was asked about the diameter of the base and construction of the pole. Mr. Odom
replied the base of the flag pole would be 32" in diameter and the pole would be constructed out of
galvanized steel, which comes in multiple sections, is engineered for hurricane force winds and
designed to the Florida Hurricane Standards.
Council
292 Regular 5- 22- 07
ORD. 1724 cont.
Mr. Odom was asked if he supported Eglin' s mission, if he was concerned about the
height
restrictions, if other flags could be flown from the flag pole, if other
people could use the same
ordinance, and whether it could be considered an banner. Mr. Odom
advertising he
replied
supported Eglin' s mission and if it would interfere with their mission he would agree but Eglin has
already stated they have no objection to flag poles to 200 feet; that he will not fly other flags and
voluntarily committed to flying the American flag; others could use the same ordinance and fly a
flag of a state or country other than an American flag; it could not be considered an advertising
banner as the City Code specifically prohibits
advertising flags or banners on flag poles.
The question was asked if the pole would have additional heavier reinforced construction to
prevent it falling toward the park area. Mr. Odom stated the foundation is 17 feet square by eight
feet thick with 2 ~ inch bolts five feet long imbedded in the concrete and is
designed not to tilt over
in any direction.
The Mayor Pro Tem opened the public
hearing.
Bill Walter, 320 Smith Drive NE, commended Mr. Odom for
improving Fort Walton Beach greatly
then spoke against a 170' flag pole that exceeds the limitation and
height if it is allowed
expressed
at Uptown Station then everyone in the
City should be allowed to do the same.
Janet and Frank Fuller, 76 Waynel Circle, spoke in
