Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 08-09-05 — reading text

PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM R- NC RESIDENTIAL- NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT TO C-2 ( GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney announced a quasi- judicial proceeding and advised Mr. Mitchell had been previously sworn in. Mr. Mitchell explained the request and advised the Municipal Planning Board recommended approval. It was noted the applicant was not present. The Staff Report was entered and accepted into the record. Dr. Pullen advised he was present at the MPB meeting when this item was discussed. The Mayor opened the public hearing. As there was none, the public hearing was closed. 208 o o 6/ 30/ 05 ORD. 1639 ( CONTI Mr. Campbell seconded motion and Mr. Tucker moved to adopt Ord. 1639 on first reading. Tucker, Pullen, Campbell, and it carried unanimously with Holmes, Patterson, Campbell, Minich in favor (Hartwell absent). REGULAR AGENDA-GENERAL PUBLIC Jim Dowling, 228 Santa Rosa, discussed the permitting process that must be followed by developers. STRIP PARKWAY SE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SONADO CONDOS. 54 MIRACLE Associates, Inc. for owner Walton Sound, Consideration of a request by applicant Emerald Coast at 54 Miracle Strip Parkway SE, LLC. For site plan approval of Sonado Condominium located 20) units. The project consisting of one four-story condominium building containing twenty ( two parking as well as surface spaces to accommodate proposes an underground parking garage spaces per unit. and swore in those who wished to testify. The City Attorney announced a quasi-judicial proceeding Dean Burgess of Emerald Coast Associates, the applicant, concurred with the recommendations of Staff. additional to report. The Staff Report was Peggy Fowler, Planner, advised Staff had nothing entered and accepted into the record. Council received clarification that stonnwater run-off will be accommodated on site through the use of an esfiltration system. this item was discussed. Dr. Pullen advised he attended the CRA meeting when Mr. Tucker moved to approve the site plan for Son ado Condominiums, 54 Miracle Strip This recommendation is based upon the Parkway SE, subject to the following conditions: Coast Associates, Inc. and dated 4/25/ 05, application and site plan developed by Emerald and conceptual landscape plan revised 5/26/ 05 ( Job #05. 102) and architectural drawings 4/ 21/ 05, revised 5/24/ 05 ( Job # 1084). developed by Harrison Design Associates, Inc. 1) Prior to the City granting a demolition permit the applicant shall agree to the following: must be monitored by an a. Removal of the building ( including the deck area) the site, and especially the deck area, as archaeologist to assure as little disturbance of the archaeologist will Investigate the suspected possible. After the building Is removed, the site intact shell middens in the deck area and verify whether these middens would make Places. Shovel tests shall also be taken eligible for the National Register of Historic in front of the building to see if elsewhere in the building footprint area and the paved area If the site is eligible for listing, the further investigation Is required in those locations. of State that they are conducting a archaeologist shall notify the City and the Department No additional Phase II and/or III investigation Including any required mitigation plans. a foundation shall be granted until this archaeological permit, building permits, including investigation is completed. 2) Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: of State, Division of Historical a. Acknowledgement from the Florida Department must be received Resources, that they have reviewed the summary archaeological report If the State recommends any major by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. revised site plan revisions based on their review of the summary archaeological report, the c site plan must be re-submitted to the CRA Board and b. The plans must address all items submitted by staff the in City Council memorandums for approval. distributed at the May 16, 2005 DRC meeting: Zoning and Building comments:  o o 209 6/ 30/ 05 SONADO CONDOS ( CONTI 1. Site Plan Issues: a. The Site Data Table needs the following revisions: Add a Une for Site Density Requirements that states density bonus points are provided to allow the maximum density of 22. 5 units per acre. 0. 98@22. 5 acre= 22 units maximum. b. The dumpster location must be fixed on the site plan- there are no variances. c. There is no pedestrian walk or pattern identifying a pedestrian connection into the site from the sidewalk along US 98. 2. Architectural Issues: Please review Section 20- 695( g)(3), relating to the height of structures in the MUW- 18 zoning district. The architectural drawings need to include a cross section showing height of the building from mean sea level to the highest point of the the mean sea level elevation, building. Include garage floor elevation, first habitable floor elevation (as it relates to the FEMA first habitable floor requirement), elevation of the roof plate, and elevation of the highest point of the roof. Also, the roof pitch needs to be depicted on the drawings. This review was performed for the Development Review Committee and is limited to site plan requirements of Section 20- 683 of the land Development Code. Subsequent to the approved development order, a more technical review will be performed on the plans submitted as part of the building permit application. Engineering comments: 1. Water meters are to be in the right-of-way, accessible to the water meter readers and located in a grassed area, not in a drive or parking space. 2. There is an existing 1- 1/ 2" water meter serving the restaurant. Any larger or additional water taps will be made off the line to the south side of Highway 98 to the east of the existing fire hydrant on the property. 3. The City will assist in providing flow and pressure data to evaluate adequate water can be provided for a 22- unit, 50' high, building at this site. 4. Size of existing sewer service must be field verified. Size of existing service not be adequate to serve may development. 5. It is the developer' s responsibility to determine if FDEP permitting is required for the water or sewer services. 6. Stormwater management plan must meet the City' s stormwater regulations (Article VII of the land Development Code). Stormwater runoff from the entire site must be treated, including runoff from the driveways. 7. Notice must be filed with FDEP for