READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 11-13-2007 regular agenda — reading text
Part 9 of 19. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-14565-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
investigation into this matter.
in his
to the City
Mr. Miller noted that the Finance Director has brought new and innovative ideas
he has
which can help the City to run efficiently at the lowest cost. Mr. Miller also noted
and has been impressed with her
witnessed many of the Finance Director' presentations
s
knowledge and expertise.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion to authorize an investigation into the conduct
Finance Director, Lisa Absher, and it failed by a vote of 3 to 4 with Holmes, Reeves, and
of the
Minich
U
in favor and Miller, Garvie, Pullen, and Hartwell opposed.
INVESTIGATION OF CONDUCT OF CITY MANAGER
Consideration of a discussion relating to Charter Section 12 with the Council in regard to
Shanahan.
conducting an investigation into the conduct of the City Manager, Joyce
Dr. Pullen withdrew his item to discuss an investigation of the conduct of the City Manager,
and
that the majority of Council has voted
to move forward with the business of the City. He stated
to retain the current Charter Officers; and that the Charter Officers have the
previously
responsibility ofbeing mature and adult enough to work together for the betterment of the City.
The City Attorney clarified that this was an appropriate action and no further discussion was
needed.
DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL DECORUM
c Consideration of a discussion on 1) the decorum of the City Council Meetings; ( 2) review
the
and ( 3) to counter the
concept of how a councilman assumes and performs his responsibilities;
the Oct 9 Council meeting by the Mayor and two Councilmen.
allegations made against me at
Mr. Miller expressed his concern regarding the lack of decorum directed toward him during
and
He voiced his concerns the next day to the City
after the Council meeting of October 9.
after the telecast and reading a verbatim of the
Manager and the City Attorney, and reviewing
issue in question, he did not feel like anyone acted like gentlemen during the meeting. He
cited
during disagreement in views, and
the need for politeness and civility during meetings, even a
he felt like he was personally attacked verbally.
he asks
Mr. Miller stated that allegations were made toward him at the meeting, and that when
someone else
questions the person to whom it is directed to does not respond, but
answers.
Mr. Miller referenced comments made by the Mayor stating that Council discussions of late tend
to turn to the day- to- day operations of the City, including where Staff should be placed and how
to market the Golf Course. Mr. Miller alluded that the Mayor receives unsolicited assistance in
conducting the meetings, and that only one person, the moderator, should be conducting the
meetings.
the
Mr. Miller stated he was twice accused of a misdemeanor by a fellow councilmember after
Mayor made allegations of using e- mails to suggest that City employees be placed someplace
else way below the Charter Officers and that an employee of the City' s Finance Department
should be moved from one supervisor to another, and of supposed wrong doings in regards to
dealing with developers.
c'
4__._'___
197
1 0/ 23/ 07
Regular Council
COUNCIL DECORUM ( CaNT)
Mr. Miller read' Section 6. 16 of the Charter, which states " Council shall not interfere in
appointments or removals, violation a misdemeanor," and he does not believe he committed a
misdemeanor. He asked the City Attorney, via e- mail, on October 16, whether he has been
performing his duties as a council person that deems criticism from the Mayor and other
councilmembers, and cited Florida Statute 166. 021, Definition of Officer. The City Attorney' s
response by phone was that essentially he was right, the Statute tells what one
shouldn' t do.
Mr. Miller further stated he was chastised for requesting the resume and a job description of a
City employee to ascertain her qualifications as the individual was selected to negotiate on
behalf of the He stressed his strong feeling that Council be aware and well- informed of
City.
what is going on in the City, and that is what he has done; he asks questions, he reads the
Charter, and the only thing he wants to do is to be able to make wise decisions, and he does not
feel it is right that he was accused of a misdemeanor, in public, and nothing was said about it.
He asked Council to' be civil with one another and the citizens of the City, and to address the
issues in a mature, respectful manner.
Mr. Minich countered Mr. Miller' s comments, stating that meetings are governed by Roberts
Rules of Order thereby anyone who sees a violation of the rules has a right to say so, and as a
member of Council, if he sees a violation he will bring it up anytime he sees fit. Mr. Minich
continued that at the October 9 meeting, Mr. Miller brought up a motion not on the agenda after
the agenda was accepted, and that when the City Attorney advised that Council should not
address a quasi- judicial issue Mr. Miller said he didn' t care. Mr. Minich said he contacted the
City Attorney after that meeting to ask if Mr. Miller had violated the Charter and she replied via
e- mail thatyes. youcan.tmakesuggestionsonwhatgoesonintheCitystaff. Mr. Minich
stressed that talking to developers before a quasi- judicial proceeding is not the way the City
c does business; that everyone has to go by the rules. Mr. Minich further informed that Council is
not full time employees of the City; they are here to make executive decisions and are not here
to run the City, the City Manager has the responsibility to run the City under the
Council/ Manager form of government. Mr. Minich commented he does not always practice the
best decorum; however, when he feels someone is behaving out of the rules he becomes upset.
He also commented that questions directed toward the City Manager, especially in e- mails,
should be asked in a respectful manner, and not in a demanding tone.
Dr. Pullen advised he has read the Charter numerous times and it is his opinion that City
Council has the ultimate responsibility of being aware of everything done in the City and by. the
City staff. He stated the City Manager has the responsibility to carry out the decisions of the
majority of Council. He also discussed the right for Council to be able to attend any City
meeting as long as they do not interfere. When questioned, Dr. Pullen advised he was told that
he cannot attend weekly Staff meetings held with the City' s department directors.
Dr. Pullen questioned who paid for the services of the labor attorney in regards to the Finance
Director issue when a councilmember called. The City Manager advised if the attorney bills the
will pay, but that is not always the case. She reminded Council the City not only
1 City,the City
has a City Attorney, but attorneys in specialized fields and Council has talked to them in the
past, and if billed the City has the responsibility to pay for the services.
J
Mr. Garvie stated the importance of decorum, and agreed that all of Council needs to watch their
decorum.
c Mr. Miller questioned why the City Attorney responded to his e- mail question about his violating
the Charter by telephone, yet Mr. Minich stated when he e- mailed the question to her, she
responded to Mr. Minich via e- mail. The City Attorney advised Mr. Miller that as she does with
each councilmen, she takes into consideration the true question being asked.
198
10/ 23/ 07
Regular Council
COUNCIL DECORUM ( CONT)
c She advised Mr. Miller that his question was very broad in nature, and that she
called the
bottom line was that it
following day advising that his question was complicated, and that the
was not a legal issue but an issue of and procedures on the Council. She continued
protocol
that Mr. Minich' s question was very direct; he asked if it was a violation and she responded the
same way, that it could be construed that way, and that the person
who determines if Council
sent Mr.
interferes with their job is the City Manager. She further informed the City Manager
Miller an e- mail
Mr. Minich. The
him he was
telling interfering
consistent, although definitely delivered in
Minich' s e- mail to anyone who requests it.
in her job, and that is the same advice she gave
City Attorney
