READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — 2013 meeting #1142 (date undetermined) — 1-3 Engineering — reading text
Part 2 of 2. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 11-1-3 Engineering.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Nuclear Density Gauge Machine.
PROGRAM GOAL:
The Land Development Review and Permitting section’s mission is to ensure that infrastructure proposed and
constructed for citizen use is compliant with minimum technical standards and promotes the health, safety and
welfare of the general public.
KEY OBJECTIVES:
1. Verify that all submitted designs (both those intended for public dedication and private
ownership/maintenance) meet or exceed the minimum standards set forth in the Land Development Code to
protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public.
2. Coordinate public and private proposed improvements (across county and municipal jurisdictions) for
compatibility.
3. Inspect improvements to verify that they are constructed in accordance with the approved development
documents prior to making a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance of
maintenance responsibility.
4. Maintain open communication with project applicants from the pre-application meeting through
development approval.
5. Provide an efficient development review process.
6. Monitor stormwater and transportation concurrency in accordance with the Land Development Code and
Comprehensive Plan.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Actual Estimated Adopted
Performance Measures
FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14
Number of full time employees 4 4 4
Input
Number of development plans received 39 67 60*
Number of final inspection requests received 12 39 30*
Number of plats approved 2 4 5*
Output
Number of formal inspections performed 12 39 30*
Number of plan reviews performed 39 67 60*
Efficiency
Average time for plan review (work days) 15 15 15
Average time between request and performance of an inspection
2 2 2
(work days)
Effectiveness
Percentage of plans reviewed within LDC requirements 100 100 100
Percentage of inspections performed within 72 hours of request 100 100 90
*Actual amount is dependent upon the number of development applications made and the rate of construction
by the developer.