READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — April 27, 2013 — reading text
Part 51 of 137. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
8.1.a.a
Packet Pg. 443
Attachment: Shalimar Annex (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation
Property Appraiser Area
8.1.a.a
Packet Pg. 444
Attachment: Shalimar Annex (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation
Tax Collector Area
8.1.a.a
Packet Pg. 445
Attachment: Shalimar Annex (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation
Supervisor of Elections Area
8.1.a.a
Packet Pg. 446
Attachment: Shalimar Annex (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation
BCC Area
8.1.a.a
Packet Pg. 447
Attachment: Shalimar Annex (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation
8.1.a.b
Packet Pg. 448
Attachment: Shalimar - Space Allocation Plan Options (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
8.1.a.b
Packet Pg. 449
Attachment: Shalimar - Space Allocation Plan Options (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
8.1.a.b
Packet Pg. 450
Attachment: Shalimar - Space Allocation Plan Options (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
8.1.a.b
Packet Pg. 451
Attachment: Shalimar - Space Allocation Plan Options (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
8.1.a.b
Packet Pg. 452
Attachment: Shalimar - Space Allocation Plan Options (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
8.1.a.c
November 30, 2012
Attachment: Shalimar Annex Task Force Meeting - Nov 30 Minutes (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
Shalimar Annex Task Force Committee Meeting
Friday meeting (9 AM) of the Shalimar Annex Task Force Meeting,
in the Jury Assembly Room.
Committee members present were:
• Jim Curry Okaloosa County Administrator
• John Dowd Okaloosa County Attorney
• Charlie Clary DAG
• Pat Ballasch DAG
• Leven Lord Lord and Son
• Dave Burleson Lord and Son
• J.R. Stokes Stokes Architectural, Inc.
• Don Howard Clerk of Courts
• Kathy Henry Clerk of Courts
• Larry Ashley Sheriff
• JD Peacock Sheriff’s Administration
• Paul Lux Supervisor of Elections
• Ben Anderson Tax Collector
• William Bishop Chief Assistant
State Attorney
• Jason McKinney Public Defender’s Office
• Mack Busbee Property Appraiser’s Office
• Don Turner Okaloosa County Facility
Maintenance
• Alicia Wardlow Court Administration
• Kari Barlow NWFDW
Purpose: Advisory Group to the Board for the renovation of the
Shalimar Annex.
Jim Curry provided a welcome and brief overview to the members.
• Board Master Plan for county offices consolidation
• Meigs Trust Litigation and the courts final determination
under the appeal process
• Minimum funding allocations for a design build team
consisting of DAG and Lord and Son
• Long-term growth and planning considerations
Packet Pg. 453
8.1.a.c
John Dowd advised the members of Sunshine Law requirements and
Attachment: Shalimar Annex Task Force Meeting - Nov 30 Minutes (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
how it pertains to the Task Force.
Charlie Clary, DAG discussed the challenges of renovating the
Shalimar Annex:
• Stormwater issues
• Due programming/building overall program
• Space needs
• ADA issues
• County/Task Force needs
• Parking/security challenges
• Judicial space requirement (15,000 sq ft of the 60,000 sq
ft allocation)
• Future growth planning
• Quality/quantity issues and parking considerations
• Public access
• Major repairs (HVAC systems, roof, energy efficient, etc.)
• Site map provided
• DAG will meet with potential occupants to determine their
requirements and needs.
Committee members’ discussion consisted of the following:
• Mr. Stokes, original architect of the Shalimar Annex
addressed space measurement requirements, receipt of
original plans, and structural/foundation elements.
• Mr. Lord and team under the impression that it is important
to plan accordingly for the Property Appraiser and Tax
Collector of being the first occupants to move.
• Mr. Lux advised that 2014 is an election year and his
department will be very busy.
• Mr. Curry advised the members that the Board dedicated
15,000 sq. ft. for the judicial system and supporting
services. This sq. ft. will consist of a functional daily
use court space with daily court sessions occurring. There
may be two entrances, one on the courts with security and
another without security for the non-judicial operations.
The County Judicial System will determine what their needs
are based upon their use and scheduling process. The
renovations are to be done per code and will occur in two
phrases. The first phrase consists of a 20% schematic
design process occurring with full design and construction
in the 2nd phrase. The budget estimated is $6M for this
project with the old hospital renovation estimated an
Packet Pg. 454
8.1.a.c
additional $1M. It is important to keep in mind that the
Attachment: Shalimar Annex Task Force Meeting - Nov 30 Minutes (1469 : Shalimar Task Force Space Allocation Recommendations)
budget should be reasonable and objective and it is very
challenging from a budget viewpoint. The Board is aware
that the Shalimar Annex is an aging facility and the plan
is to add an additional 50 year life into this building.
Property Appraiser and Tax Collectors five-year leases
expire in September 2014 are the highest priority with
their rents totaling $1/2M. The meetings between DAG and
potential occupiers important to determine who will fit and
what their needs are. This Advisory Board can recommend
viable options to the BCC Board for relocation to potential
occupiers at other sites. The Board is aware that the
process of breathing life into an aging facility and what
the scope definition is important to the project.
• Mr. Howard advised the court requirements are for a
permanent judicial system and this will determine what they
need.
• Sheriff Ashley advised that the hospital area is ready for
renovation and this building should be utilized as soon as
possible. Also, his Records and Security area open for
occupation purposes.
• Mr. Anderson inquiries comprised of the following: is the
Shalimar Annex, Hospital, and Sheriff’s portion the only
options available? Any other south end property available
for consideration? Does the School Board have any property
that is available such as the Ocean City Elementary School?
What about budgeting issues, internal operations, any
consideration regarding vertical parking to address parking
concerns, any grandfathered clauses, what is the County
vision, and long term solutions/thoughts to what this
location will serve. Mr. Curry advised that everything is
open for discussion and these are viable points.
• Design Build Team will schedule individual meetings with
each stakeholder to evaluate needs.
• Next meeting anticipated early in January.
• Friday’s at 9 AM appear to be an acceptable day/time for
future meetings.
(Meeting adjoined at approximately 10 AM with minutes
transcribed by Sandi Mack)
Packet Pg. 455
8.2.a
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: March 19, 2013
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Dino J. Villani
SUBJECT: MSA Amended Lease and Debt Repayment
DEPARTMENT: Airport
BCC DISTRICT: All
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The BCC is requested to approve an amended and restated lease
and operating agreement with Miracle Strip Aviation (MSA) and Debt Repayment Agreement
BACKGROUND: The existing MSA lease agreement assumed by the new owner needs
revisions to bring it into line with the current operating environment. The current lease from
June 1998 has been amended twice, but still includes references to past conditions and surveys.
This amended and restated edition corrects previous survey errors, requires a new environmental
baseline survey, adjusts the percentage of gross sales to equalize rates for each FBO, establishes
facility maintenance responsibilities, and defines lease assignment provisions to include a fee.
The performance bond was also raised from $25,000 to $50,000. Other terms for fees for
insurance/indemnification were raised to the current levels required for an FBO. The lease also
includes the provisions of an approved debt repayment agreement (Exhibit D) assumed by the
new owners. This document has been coordinated in accordance with County policy.
The Debt Repayment Agreement is a separate document attached and
