Compare reading text with the preserved source. Line breaks and spacing are retained; long lines wrap to fit the screen. A file's role does not establish that its text has been checked.
Complete local reading text and source notice
Reading transcription · Review label: Known limitations
The Colloquy of Monos and Una — Edgar Allan Poe
Local reading from The Works of Edgar Allan Poe, Raven Edition, volume 4. This is a later collected text, not the first printing named in the research list.
THE COLLOQUY OF MONOS AND UNA
Μελλοντα
ταυτα.—SOPHOCLES—Antig.
“These things are in the near future.”
Una. “Born again?”
Monos. Yes, fairest and best beloved Una, “born again.” These were
the words upon whose mystical meaning I had so long pondered, rejecting
the explanations of the priesthood, until Death himself resolved for me
the secret.
Una. Death!
Monos. How strangely, sweet Una, you echo my words! I observe, too,
a vacillation in your step—a joyous inquietude in your eyes. You are
confused and oppressed by the majestic novelty of the Life Eternal. Yes,
it was of Death I spoke. And here how singularly sounds that word which of
old was wont to bring terror to all hearts—throwing a mildew upon
all pleasures!
Una. Ah, Death, the spectre which sate at all feasts! How often,
Monos, did we lose ourselves in speculations upon its nature! How
mysteriously did it act as a check to human bliss—saying unto it
“thus far, and no farther!” That earnest mutual love, my own
Monos, which burned within our bosoms—how vainly did we flatter
ourselves, feeling happy in its first up-springing, that our happiness
would strengthen with its strength! Alas! as it grew, so grew in our
hearts the dread of that evil hour which was hurrying to separate us
forever! Thus, in time, it became painful to love. Hate would have been
mercy then.
Monos. Speak not here of these griefs, dear Una—mine, mine,
forever now!
Una. But the memory of past sorrow—is it not present joy? I
have much to say yet of the things which have been. Above all, I burn to
know the incidents of your own passage through the dark Valley and Shadow.
Monos. And when did the radiant Una ask anything of her Monos in
vain? I will be minute in relating all—but at what point shall the
weird narrative begin?
Una. At what point?
Monos. You have said.
Una. Monos, I comprehend you. In Death we have both learned the
propensity of man to define the indefinable. I will not say, then,
commence with the moment of life’s cessation—but commence with that
sad, sad instant when, the fever having abandoned you, you sank into a
breathless and motionless torpor, and I pressed down your pallid eyelids
with the passionate fingers of love.
Monos. One word first, my Una, in regard to man’s general
condition at this epoch. You will remember that one or two of the wise
among our forefathers—wise in fact, although not in the world’s
esteem—had ventured to doubt the propriety of the term
“improvement,” as applied to the progress of our civilization. There were
periods in each of the five or six centuries immediately preceding our
dissolution, when arose some vigorous intellect, boldly contending for
those principles whose truth appears now, to our disenfranchised reason,
so utterly obvious—principles which should have taught our race to
submit to the guidance of the natural laws, rather than attempt their
control. At long intervals some masterminds appeared, looking upon each
advance in practical science as a retro-gradation in the true utility.
Occasionally the poetic intellect—that intellect which we now feel
to have been the most exalted of all—since those truths which to us
were of the most enduring importance could only be reached by that analogy
which speaks in proof tones to the imagination alone and to the unaided
reason bears no weight—occasionally did this poetic intellect
proceed a step farther in the evolving of the vague idea of the
philosophic, and find in the mystic parable that tells of the tree of
knowledge, and of its forbidden fruit, death-producing, a distinct
intimation that knowledge was not meet for man in the infant condition of
his soul. And these men—the poets—living and perishing amid
the scorn of the “utilitarians”—of rough pedants, who arrogated to
themselves a title whi
Download this text file with its original spacing ↓
Only a preview is loaded on this record page. The linked reading pages contain the remaining text and work without JavaScript.