Fort Walton Beach Ordinance — 1750 sale real property 109 Ready — reading text

unit reduces the of a large and effective confining aquifer and the presence water zones. Therefore, further into drinking potential for contaminant migration to be warranted. CERCLA assessment of the groundwater pathway does not appear t of concern based Surface Water Mi~ ration. The surface water migration route is surface water and sediment samples. i- observed contaminant levels in several i. J on Surface water sample RLSW- 03 and sediment sample RLSD- landfill area on 03, the both east collected side were from a both small wetland area within the RLSD- 03 contained a range of contaminated. RLSW- 03 contained acetone and i"".' h! polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons chlorinated pesticides and PCB' s. at high concentrations Sediment sample RLSD- 04, as well collected in as metals, a wetland also contained acetone. Surface the landfill on the east side, area north of Avenue next to collected from the storm sewer along Ready rJ', I water sample RLSW- 06, both landfilled areas, contained acetone as well. Also, l, l, I- trichloroethane detected in drain sample RL- SW07 and several organics were in the surface water do not RL- SW07 and RL- SW08) RL- SW08. However, the contaminants in these samples ( 1 i to the site. appear to be attributable 4 It is therefore the 100- year flood plain [ 27, 28]. Onsite wetlands coincide with surface and transport i 1 possible for stormwater runoff contaminants offsite. to travel across Further evaluation of the the landfill surface water pathway maybe warranted. J Soil Exposure. Onsite exposure to contaminated of soils an onsite or at this site large nearby population is not a concern due to the absence significant the fence around the fire training area and the restriction to access provided by RAl.P2 34 FINAL ( 1/ 24/ 95)  i A\- I t I r I' lead levels in the surface soils within the pistol and pistol range. Although, remediation, further range high and may warrant further assessment and area are due to the limi ted CERCLA evaluation of the soil exposure pathway is not warranted I~" ! cl access to contaminated ,areas and the absence of an ons i te res idential popula tion. Air Mi2ration. Lead exposure due to particulate matter ingestion of windblown I IF' would be a possible health concern if an onsite or nearby population was present. I I I route is not concern at this time. Since neither exists, the air migration a I') 11 I] I" 1 j J fj I 1.1 l I n J 1 1 j RAL.P2 FINAL (1/24/ 951 35  I ,I 1...;- r i CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 the Avenue Landfill site is source of I The SI has documented that Ready a I contamination of soil, surface water, and surface water sediments groundwater, organics. Also, high levels of soil contamination by lead were 1 by metals and some i I j detected in surface soils in the vicinity of the FOP pistol range located near I the landfill. Surface water contamination by high concentrations of organic related to petroleum was identified in an offsite compounds that are primarily 1 off- site u i; stormwater sample and is also attributable to an source. I j activities have resulted in contamination at the Ready Although past disposal Avenue Landfill, the site does not meet eligibility criteria for inclusion OB to 1' the NPL, no pursuant to the Hazard Ranking System. further CERCLA action be initiated at the site. However, Therefore it is reconunended that further assessment Waste Cleanup of the site may be warranted pursuant to state regulations and FDEP situated south policies. Also, FDEP should complete an evaluation of facilities of the