Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 04-09-13--regular — reading text

her father pass away, Ms. Thomas was overwhelmed by grief, and her owri personal circumstances. Understandably, she went into a deep depression. Given the nature of her v struggles, it is also understandable that she neglected her property. V With help, Ms. Thomas has recovered from her depression. While she continues to live with 7 her mother due to her financial situation, she is optimistic about the real estate market and she is fighting to regain her financial health. However, Ms. Thomas needs more surgery. She has no insurance mid because she owns properly, she does not qualify for Medicaid. Ms. Thomas presently has the property under contract for sale at $ 150, 000, and is hoping to be able to get ti this surgery soon with proceeds of the sale. um w As part of the sales process a title search was done. Ms. Thomas was shocked to learn the extent of code enforcement liens on her property. She knew she had violations in the past, but she believed she had come into compliance on all occasions, prior a hearing being set on all a violations. As to the liens in CASE NO: 07- 00000852 and CASE NO: 11- 00000020, She believes she never received actual notice of these hearings as a result of her living in multiple homes during those times. This seems to be verified by the certified mail receipts in her file T showing the Notices as " return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward ". 00 While the City has previously, graciously, agreed to releasing liens on the property for payment of $3, 750. However, after paving property taxes, closing costs, and the IRS tax lien, Ms. Thomas will have little to show after the sale. As such, due to the foregoing mitigating circumstances, we respectfully request the City waive all of these liens. Thank you for considering our request and we look forward to your response. 3: m Sincerely, co Ce Sl Dad Paul Plourlacker uawa3jo ;u3 apoo jo;; senbaa : 94ZZ) 6aewwng sea=l put suai-1 anuany qnlp ,O; unoo C99 4uawg3e; 7V amam Y YU aAUA a 4 P 9 9 9 I Fees Selection Case number, type: 07 00000852 ROOF MAINTENANCE property address, ID: 653 COUNTRY CLUB AVE NE 28252 Tenant number, name: Kathy Thomas 259 -5791 CODE ENFORCEMENT FINE9 35100 00 o / t2 / OB 00' GO, 00': r E O0 FEES OEAOLITICX / ABA]' EMENT a.._.._.. r 0 00 FEEv - GEN INISAXCE AeA' MNT 00 09 C 00 FEE9 - LOT COTI' ING AEATEMNT 00 OOJ M Y eru n a luawoolo ;u3 apop Io; lsonboM : 94ZZ) tiewwnS seaj pue sua -1 enuany gnlp lilunoo ESS quowgoelltl F a ICI a u Yaum P 9 d ti' i Fees Selection Case number, type: 11 00000020 GRASS HEIGHT. DEVELOPED Property address, ID: 653 COUNTRY CLUB AVE NE 28252 Tenant number, name: I, I. 0 00 CCCE INix FEE. 00 213_ 0/ 1_3 650G COLE EMFORCENEML FINE9 26250. 650 00 2/ 29/ 11 00. 0. 0f. FEES- OEM011TION / AEATEnENT 00 0].. - 0 00 FEES- EN NU39ANCE 00 OP f 0 00 , FEES- TIXG AEA iATEI-0HT 00 00 cw( u Jj I x 151c mvJc aUTJ GJ UO n F- 1-5 1-- ] b_ CN vQaJ T CJ UO M  15. t. c v ca Qa UT UbnOCh7 aNN P Pg. 46.,'  CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA CASE NO: 07- 00000852 City of Fort Walton Beach, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, PETITIONER, vs- KATHITHOMAS 903 LIGHTHOUSE ROAD RESPONDENT( S) ACTION ON STATEMENT OF NONCOMPLIANCE, AND SECOND ORDER THIS CASE comes for action by the Municipal Code Enforcement Board of the City of Fort Walton Beach on NOVEMBER 12, 2008, after due notice to the Respondent( s), and the Board, having issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order on AUGUST 13, 2008 with regard to this case, hereby issues its further Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Second Order, as follows: 1. FINDINGS OF FACT: The Respondent( s), whose mailing address is 903 LIGHTHOUSE ROAD, FL, 32547 is/ me the owner(s) / person( s) in charge of the property described as follows: SUBJECT: 653 COUNTRY CLUB AVE NE BLOCK B LOT 3 & S 30.75 FEET OF LOT 2 Tax ID # 24- S1 -36- 0540 -OOOB -003B Fort Walton Beach, Florida Okaloosa County The attached condition( s), first observed on JUNE 27, 2007, was/were found to exist on subiect property. On AUGUST 8, 2007, service of the Notice of Violation to the Respondent(s) was obtained in accordance with Chapter 162. 12 of Florida Statue through ( certified mail, posting, or hand delivery) as reflected in the exhibits of this case. Said notice stated that the attached condition(s) constituted ( a) violation(s) of the Ordinances of the City of Fort Walton Beach, Florida, and was/were to be corrected on or before OCTOBER 22, 2007. V InMr # 2532161 BK. 2865 PG4847, Pa . 1 N 4 R. MN 111191 a 1005 AM, RECORDING: $ 19. 50 RECORDNG q MCLE V: $ 1600 O nFPVN GLERKPUUNN 1. Attachment: CEB 07 852 Case File 1 ( 2246: Request for Code Enforcement Fine Waiver - 653 Country El"  Re- inspection of the subject property on OCTOBER 22, 2007 revealed that said violation(s) had not been corrected. After due notice to the Respondent( s), this case was brought for public hearing before the Board on AUGUST 13, 2008. The Board found that the violation( s) did exist, and ordered the Respondent( s) to correct said violation(s) on or before SEPTEMBER 12, 2008. Re- inspection of subject property on SEPTEMBER 12, 2008 verified that said violation( s) had not been corrected as ordered. H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The Respondents, by reason of the foregoing facts, did not comply with the AUGUST 13, 2008 Order of this Board, in that the Respondents did not correct the cited violation(s) on or before SEPTEMBER 12, 2008, as specified in said Order. I11. SECOND ORDER: 1. The Finding of Noncompliance is hereby accepted, the Respondent(s) not having corrected the attached violation(s) on or before SEPTEMBER 12, 2008. 2. The Respondent(s) is/ are hereby ordered to correct the attached violation(s) and to pay a fine of $ 100.00 per day for each day the violation(s) cominue( s) beyond SEPTEMBER 12, 2008. The Respondent( s) is/ are further ordered to contact the Department of Community Development Services to arrange for re- inspection of subject property in order to verify the date on which said violation(s) has/have been corrected. The Board also fords that since the Respondent failed to correct the violation as above before SEPTEMBER 12, 2008, that the Respondent owes an Administrative Fee of $325. 00 due and payable by the fast day of