READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — June 2, 2015 — Okaloosa Co ABF Feasibility Study C2014-042 — reading text
Part 4 of 9. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Okaloosa Co ABF Feasibility Study C2014-042 — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
0
0
-15
Of
5 0
-2
0
Mexico
-50
00 STUDY
-10
FOCUS
-50
28°0'0"N 28°0'0"N
AREA
W 50
es -1
t 0 -25
00 -50
0
-15 -3000 Fl
-10
orida
00 00 500
-20
-1
Es
car
0
50
-2
27°0'0"N 27°0'0"N
pm Legend
ent Tuna EFH
Distance to East Pass
Depth (meters)
PROJECT
Notes: C2014-042
5 FIGURE 3
TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC. ADULT TUNA, ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH)
1. Bathymetry Source: National Geophysical Data Center,
NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce
DRAWN BY
PL
1221 AIRPORT ROAD, SUITE 210 OKALOOSA ABF STUDY 2. Basemap Source: USGS
SHEET
DESTIN, FL 32541 OKALOOSA COUNTY, FL 3. Vertical Datum: MLLW Meters DATE
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION # 4815 4. Horizontal Datum: NAD 1983 AUGUST 2014
\\NAS2K12\nass2\PROJECTS\C2014-042 Okaloosa ABF Study\GIS\MXDs\Figure 3 Tuna.mxd
3.0 MOORED BUOY LOCATIONS
Mooring and fishing buoys are in use around the world, in all major oceans and seas, in estuarine,
nearshore, and deep ocean waters. Anchored buoys for artisanal / subsistence fishing occur around many
Caribbean islands, Guam, West Indian Ocean islands (e.g., around the Seychelles, Comores Island, and
Mauritius), Australia, New Guinea, the South Sea islands, etc.; however, very few documented fishing
buoys occur in American waters. A very old technology, the use of buoys and other floating objects to
attract fish has garnered a great deal of interest as expanding populations and industries continue to
exploit ocean fisheries at an ever increasing rate, aided in part by these devices. The islands of Hawaii
have an extensive anchored FAD system for recreational uses, in place for over 30 years (Holland et al.,
2000). The Hawaii system is the only currently active FAD system in the United States. The State of
Hawaii, University of Hawaii (which manages the FAD system), and NOAA are discussing a permit for
the system, which was developed prior to a permitting requirement (personal communication, July 2014,
Warren Cortez, University of Hawaii). The government of Guam, an American protectorate, began
development of an anchored FAD system in 1979 (Torres, 2000) and has a system of 14 FADs in its
program (Government of Guam, 2011). The FADs are part of a Marine Conservation Plan approved by
the US National Marine Fisheries Service for the period 2011 – June 2014 (Government of Guam, 2011).
The Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism (CFRM), an organization of 20 Caribbean Island nations,
is exploring the use of anchored FADs to increase sustainable fisheries and provide an economic boost to
the member countries (CRFM, 2013). Given the lack of documented buoy systems within the United
States and the limited information available on the above programs, the Hawaii program serves as a
model for developing a similar program in Florida offshore of Okaloosa County.
4.0 BUOY DESIGNS AND ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COSTS
The state of Hawaii has maintained a FAD system since 1977. Following the success of a few
experimental anchored rafts established by the Honolulu Laboratory (Southwest Fisheries Center) of the
National Marine Fisheries Service, the state expanded the system in the 1980s and placed the program
under the operational management of the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), School of Ocean
and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST) of the University of Hawaii in 1996. HIMB currently
maintains 55 buoys statewide.
The Hawaii FADs lie in 700 – 10,000 ft (200 – 3,000 m) of water. Surface buoys (buoys floating
on the surface) (Figure 4) maintain an average life span of 3 – 4 years (Holland et al., 2000; personal
communication, July 2014, Cortez) and subsurface buoys (Figure 4) last 5 – 6 years. In comparison, deep
ocean NOAA data buoys have a reliability of 50% (even odds of failure of the mooring system) in 1 – 3
years after deployment and a reliability of about 15% in 5 years (Maxwell et al., 2010).
6
Figure 4. Surface and Subsurface Buoys (figure provided by HIMB, SOEST, University of Hawaii)
For the Hawaii system, depth does not affect buoy longevity; however, exposure to constant
Trade Winds tends to shorten buoy longevity to the low end of the range. Typically, the Hawaii buoys
experience conditions ranging from calm waters on the leeward side of the islands to 15 – 30 mph winds
producing 5 – 6-ft short frequency waves with strong currents on the windward side. These “tradewind
seas” with more rapid movements can significantly reduce buoy longevity. Generally, leeward buoys
survive
