Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 06-14-05 — reading text

or lost historic a) If unexpected discoveries, such as Native American graves verifies cemeteries were encountered, then documentation must be submitted that s Unmarked Burial Law) guidelines set forth in Chapter 872, Florida Statutes (Florida' were followed. b) Any utilityeasements required by the City/ FOOT shall be executed.  5/ 24/ 05 o II 181 SUNRISE ON THE SOUND lCONl1 c) The public boardwalk easement, including access for construction and/ or maintenance of the boardwalk, shall be executed. d) The condominium association documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, and shall provide: 1) Wording that states no units may be leased or rented for less than 31 days; 2) Guarantees for continued maintenance of all common areas; 3) Notice of all easements that are to be granted for utilities; 4) Notice that the public boardwalk easement will be granted to the City and that once the boardwalk is constructed, this improvement becomes the property of the City; and 5) Notice that a future driveway connection and/or shared access may be provided between this project and the abutting property to the west when It is redeveloped. With the additional recommendations that: 5) The applicant has been notified that staff was directed by City Council to review the issue of lowering heights in the City to 75 feet above mean sea level. This is considered notice of " planning in progress." 6) The applicant has been notified that the City is reviewing the need for public access from US 98 to the boardwalk from developments that are granting the City a boardwalk easement in order to achieve bonus density points. Mr. Tucker seconded motion. Mr. Holmes was asked whether his motion included Item 5 and replied he did not see the significance of whether it is included or not. 1 Ihe City Attorney clarified that Mr. Lambert admitted, on the record, of being notified about the tieight limitation at the CRA meeting, and that is the impetus of Item 5 of the recommendation. tinr. Minich moved to amend the motion to delete Item 5, which states, "The been notified that staff was directed applicant has by City Council to review the issue of lowering heights in the City to 75 feet above mean sea level. This is considered notice of ' planning in progress.'" Mr. Campbell seconded motion. Mr. Minich stated his opinion that the site plan meets all the codes and Item 5 should be deleted. The Mayor called for the vote on the amendment and it carried by a vote of 4 to 2 with Holmes, Campbell, Tucker, and Minich In favor and Patterson and Hartwell opposed (Pullen absent). The Mayor called for the vote on the motion, as amended to delete Item 5, and it carried a vote of 4 to 2 with Holmes, by Campbell, Tucker, and Minich in favor and Patterson and Hartwell opposed ( Pullen absent). RES. 05- 11- WATERFRONT FLORIDA PARTNERSHIP GRANT The Mayor read the resolution by title only. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH RELATING TO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF TO APPLY FORAND ENTER INTO A WATERFRONTS FLORIDA PARTNERSHIP GRANT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 182 o o 5/24/ 05 RES. 05. 11 ( CONn but has not been The City, Manager explained the City has applied for this grant in the past the City now successful, due in part to not having a waterfront community committee. She advised and that should some weight with the application has the Waters Edge Ad- Hoc Committee, carry process. afternoon it The CDS Director advised the grant used to be $ 10, 000, but the City was informed this that the grant is now $ 25, 000, and carries an equal match from the City. She also reported She recommends, though does not require, that the City hire someone to do the project. ahead and apply for the to what it entails; that the City can decline requested the City go grant see if awarded the grant. The City Manager explained that Council has to still formally accept the grant once awarded, so it will be brought back to Council. and it carried Mr. Campbell moved to adopt Res. 05. 11. Mr. Tucker seconded motion and Minich in favor unanimously with Holmes, Patterson, Campbell, Tucker, Hartwell, Pullen absent). DEBRlsrrREE REMOVAL CONTRACT with D& J Consideration of a request authorizing the City Manager to negotiate a contract Removal Services, at the unit Enterprises of Auburn, AL for award of RFP 05- 115, DebrislTree with 2005 through December 31, 2005, prices on the Bid Tabulation for the period of June 1, for the City annual renewals upon mutual agreement of both parties. Request authorization Manager to execute change orders up to $ 12, 000. for DebrisfTree Mike Tatum, Purchasing Director, explained that 18 proposals were received the Sanitation Removal and Disposal. Together with the Service Operations Manager and selected because of their Superintendent, the list was narrowed to ten firms, with D& J being and The Purchasing Director advised of the qualifications. experience, manpower, equipment, to answer any excellent references of the firm, and stated a representative from D& J was available questions Council may have. and that they Discussion included the fact that the firm has a contract with the City of Pensacola both cities; that performance bond will be required have the resources and capability to clean up a removal and disposal of all vegetative within 24 hours of a storm; and that costs associated with fees associated debris, tires, trees and stumps are included, but that the City shall pay all tipping with the disposal of C& D materials and white goods, but these are reimbursable by FEMA. have the manpower, Chip Starr of D& J Enterprises, Auburn, Alabama, confirmed they than municipality, and are capable of serving the City management and ability to handle more one in its need, and that there is no pending litigation against the firm for non- performance or anything from the Federal Government for not meeting FEMA regulations. a contract with D&J Mr. Minich moved to authorize the City Manager to negotiate 1, 2005 through December 21, 2005, Enterprises of Auburn, Alabama, for the period of June with annual renewals upon mutual agreement of both parties; and to authorize the City Mr. Holmes seconded motion and it Manager to authorize change orders up to $12,000. 00. and Minich in carried unanimously with Holmes, Patterson, Campbell, Tucker, Hartwell, favor (Pullen absent).  183 5/ 24/05 o v SUMMER SCHEDULE FOR CITY COUNCIL Consideration of setting City Council Summer Schedule as provided for in the backup report. The City Manager explained the proposed summer schedule for Council, as well as the budget workshops and the public hearings for the budget. Mr. Campbell moved the following Council Summer Schedule: Cancel the July 12th and July 26th Council meetings and the July 19th workshop; schedule the Budget Workshops for the week of August 1- 5 beginning at 5: 30 pm for as many days as necessary; and schedule the Public Hearings for the Budget on September 7, 2005 at 5: 30 p. m., and September 21, 2005, at 5: 30 p. m. Mr. Minich seconded motion and