READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 09-13-05 — reading text
Part 4 of 20. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-10080-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
might have.
As there was no one else who wished to speak, the public hearing was closed.
The Staff Report was entered and accepted into the record.
Mr. Tucker moved to adopt Ord. 1642 on first reading. Mr. Minich seconded motion.
Dr. Pullen expressed concern that the public' s access to the water would be denied, and
referenced documents from 1918, 1925, and 1968 showing easements run with the land. Staff
advised they had no knowledge of this information.
The City Attorney explained that a number of changes have gone on in this area over the years,
and from review of the Staff Report, including the July 27 memo from the Engineering Division,
there are no concerns with easements in that area. She advised that even if there was,
ordinances have been adopted over the years that have vacated much of the right the City had in
that area. She stated Staff can add it to the intent of work they will do with the applicants on public
easements on that property.
Mr. Mitchell advised a criteria for vacation of the right- of-way is that access to a public body of
water will not be negatively impacted. .
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion and it carried by a vote of 6 to 1 with Holmes,
Patterson, Campbell, Tucker, Hartwell, and Minich in favor and Pullen opposed.
ORD. 1650. AMENDING FIREFIGHTERS PENSION TRUST FUND
The City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH AMENDING THE CITY OF FORT
WALTON BEACH FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION TRUST FUND, ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO.
1174, AS SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED; AMENDING SECTION 1, DEFINITIONS, TO AMEND
THE DEFINITION OF "ACCUMULATED CONTRIBUTIONS"; AMENDING SECTION 6, SERVICE
RETIREMENT BENEFIT AMOUNTS AND ELIGIBILITY BY DELETING THE MAXIMUM BENEFIT
LIMITATION; AMENDING SECTION 23, CREDITED SERVICE - SPECIAL PROVISIONS;
AMENDING SECTION 25, DIRECT TRANSFERS OF ELIGIBLE ROLLOVER DISTRIBUTIONS;
AMENDING SECTION 27, MAXIMUM PENSION; ADDING A NEW SECTION 28, DEFERRED
RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY OF PROVISIONS;
o o 237
08- 23- 05
ORD. 1650 ( CONTI
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. As there was none, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Tucker moved to adopt Ord. 1650 on first
reading. Mr. Patterson seconded motion and
it carried unanimously with Holmes, Patterson,
Campbell, Tucker, Pullen, Hartwell, and
Minich in favor.
ORD. 1651. REZONING OF PROPERTY AT 110 ST. MARY AVENUE SW
The City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE
REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
LOCATED AT 110 ST. MARY AVENUE SW; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR
FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM R- 1A (SINGLE
FAMilY DWELLING) DISTRICT TO CF ( COMMUNITY FACILITIES) DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF A NY CONFLICTING
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
The City Attorney announced a quasi-judicial
proceeding and swore in Len Mitchell, Long Range
Planning Manager with the City, and noted that the applicant was not present.
Mr. Mitchell explained the applicant is
seeking to add new facilities to the church, and the present
R- 1A District does not permit churches as a principal use. He advised the
request is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and that the MPB recommended
approval.
The Staff Report was entered and accepted into the record.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. As there was none, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Holmes advised he was present at the MPB
meeting when this item was discussed.
Mr. Minich moved to adopt Ord. 1651 on first
reading. Mr. Campbell seconded motion and
it carried unanimously with Holmes, Patterson,
Campbell, Tucker, Pullen, Hartwell, and
Minich in favor.
ORD. 1652. REZONING OF PROPERTY AT 110 ROBINWOOD DRIVE SW
The City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE
REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
LOCATED AT 110 ROBINWOOD DRIVE SW; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR
FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM R- 1A ( SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING) DISTRICT TO EF ( EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES) DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF A NY CONFLICTING
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
The City Attorney announced a quasi-judicial proceeding and advised Mr. Mitchell had been
previously sworn in. She noted the applicant was not present.
238 o
o 08- 23- 05
ORD. 1652 ( CONTI
Mr. Mitchell explained this is a companion request to Ord. 1651 to rezone St. Mary' s Catholic
Church to the Educational Facilities District. He advised the request is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan of the City, and that the MPB recommended approval.
The Staff Report was entered and accepted into the record.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. As there was none, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Holmes advised he was present at the MPB meeting when this item was discussed.
Mr. Holmes moved to adopt Ord. 1652 on first reading. Mr. Patterson seconded motion and
it carried unanimously with Holmes, Patterson, Campbell, Tucker, Pullen, Hartwell, and
Minich in favor.
ORD. 1653. COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. 1988 AND 1992 LEWIS TURNER BLVD TO HC
The Mayor verified that the requirements of Section 20- 128( b), Land Development Code, have
been met ( notice of pubic hearings or meetings).
The City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORTWALTON BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING THE CITY' S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATING TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1988 AND 1992 LEWIS
TURNER BOULEVARD; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF
FACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE
PROPERTY FROM GC, GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO HC, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL;
PROVIDING FOR INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The City Attorney announced a quasi- judicial proceeding and that all who planned to testify were
previously sworn in.
The applicant was present.
Mr. Mitchell advised the request is for a small- scale map amendment to the FLUM from General
Commercial to Highway Commercial. He explained the request includes two parcels, with the
undeveloped parcel to be developed into a commercial building, and the other property has joined
in the application at the request of the agent.
Mr. Mitchell reported the Municipal Planning Board, acting as the Local Planning Agency, heard
the request at their August 4, 2005 public hearing, and recommended that City Council approve
the ordinance. There were no public comments either for or against the request at the public
hearing.
The applicant advised he reviewed the Staff Report and had no objection to it being entered into
the record. The Staff Report was entered and accepted into the record.
COMMENTS FROM PROPONENTS AND OPPONENTS
The Mayor asked if there were any comments from proponents or opponents of the ordinance.
Nancy McDonald, 218 Watson Drive, representing property owners in the area around the subject
request site, advised the homeowners object to any future rezoning and asked Council to consider
the establishment of a future land use that would complement Professional Office Use, which is an
excellent transition zone from commercial to residential.
o o 239
08- 23- 05
ORD. 1653 ( CONTI
Ms. McDonald distributed the names and address of the
property owners to Mayor, Council, and
City Staff.
Atty. Jeff Mcinnis, authorized agent for the applicants, stated they are working with City staff and
are following the
suggestions the City believes is appropriate for the site. Mr. Mcinnis believes
there are benefits to the requested
change and requested Council vote in favor of the ordinance.
Lillian Showers, 15 Willwall Street, spoke
against the ordinance, stating she did not believe it was
in the best interest of the residents of the area.
As there were no other comments from
proponents or opponents of the ordinance, the Public
Hearing was closed.
Mr. Campbell moved to adopt Ord. 1653 on first Mr. Tucker seconded motion.
reading.
The City Manager advised the Highway Commercial
designation is a less intensive use than what
is currently allowed there, and while she understands the
request from the residents that a
Professional Office designation be considered, that is not what is
being requested by the
applicant.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion and it carried
by a vote of 5 to 2 with Holmes,
Patterson, Campbell, Tucker, and Minich in favor and Pullen and Hartwell
opposed.
ORD. 1659. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEW " UTILITIES DEPARTMENT"
The City Attorney read the ordinance by title
only.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA;
PROVIDING FOR
AUTHORITY; ESTABLISHING A NEW DEPARTMENT ENTITLED THE "
UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT"; DISTRIBUTING CURRENT PUBLIC WORKS POSITIONS TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT; DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT;
AMENDING SECTION 2- 168, CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON
BEACH, TO REDESIGNATE THE DIVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT;
REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. As there was none, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Tucker moved to adopt Ord. 1659 on first
reading. Mr. Patterson seconded motion.
Discussion ensued regarding the need for the
reorganization of the department since it has been
working well for years; that a new department would bring the City in alignment with what other
cities are working with; and that smaller departments are easier to
