READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Eureka: A Prose Poem — Edgar A. Poe, 1848 — reading text
Part 9 of 27. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Repository OCR — unreviewed
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
power (pre
sumed to be the Divine Volition) — in other words, a cer-
tain/orce — whose measure is the quantity of matter — that
THEUNIVEHSE. 55
is to say, the number of atoms — emitted ; emits, by irradia
tion, this certain number of atoms ; forcing them in all
directions outwardly from the centre — their proximity to
each other diminishing as they proceed — until, finally, they
are distributed, loosely, over the interior surface of the
sphere.
When these atoms have attained this position, or while
proceeding to attain it, a second and inferior exercise of the
same force — or a second and inferior force of the same
character — emits, in the same manner — that is to say, by
irradiation as before — a second stratum of atoms which
proceeds to deposit itself upon the first ; the number of
atoms, in this case as in the former, being of course the
measure of the force which emitted them ; in other words
the force being precisely adapted to the purpose it effects —
the force and the number of atoms sent out by the force,
being directly proportional.
When this second stratum has reached its destined posi
tion — or while approaching it — a third still inferior exertion
of the force, or a third inferior force of a similar character
— the number of atoms emitted being in all cases the mea
sure of the force — proceeds to deposit a third stratum upon
the second : — and so on, until these concentric strata, grow
ing gradually less and less, come down at length to the
central point ; and the diffusive matter, simultaneously with
the diffusive force, is exhausted.
We have now the sphere filled, through means of irra
diation, with atoms equably diffused. The two necessary
conditions — those of irradiation and of equable diffusion — •
are satisfied ; and by the sole process in which the possibi-
56 E U B, E K A .
lity of their simultaneous satisfaction is conceivable. For
this reason, I confidently expect to find, lurking in the pre
sent condition of the atoms as distributed throughout the
sphere, the secret of which I am in search — the all-import
ant principle of the modus operandi of the Newtonian law.
Let us examine, then, the actual condition of the atoms.
They lie in a series of concentric strata. They are
equably diffused throughout the sphere. They have been
irradiated into these states.
The atoms being equably distributed, the greater the
superficial extent of any of these concentric strata, or
spheres, the more atoms will lie upon it. In other words,
the number of atoms lying upon the surface of any one of
the concentric spheres, is directly proportional with the ex
tent of that surface.
But, in any series of concentric spheres, the surfaces
are directly proportional with the squares of the distances
from the centre*
Therefore the number of atoms in any stratum is direct
ly proportional with the square of that stratum's distance
from the centre.
But the number of atoms in any stratum is the measure
of the force which emitted that stratum — that is to say, is
directly proportional with the force.
Therefore the force which irradiated any stratum is
directly proportional with the square of that stratum's dis
tance from the centre : — or, generally,
The force of the irradiation has been directly propor
tional with the squares of the distances.
* Succinctly — The surfaces of spheres are as the squares of their radii.
THE UNIVERSE. 57
Now, Reaction, as far as we know anything of it, is
Action conversed. The general principle of Gravity being,
in the first place, understood as the reaction of an act — as
the expression of a desire on the part of Matter, while ex
isting in a state of diffusion, to return into the Unity whence
it was diffused ; and, in the second place, the mind being
called upon to determine the character of the desire — the
manner in which it would, naturally, be manifested ; in
other words, being called upon to conceive a probable law,
or modus operandi, for the return ; could not well help
arriving at the conclusion that this law of return would be
precisely the converse of the law of departure. That such
would be the case, any one, at least, would be abundantly
justified in taking for granted, until such time as some per
son should suggest something like a plausible reason why it
should not be the case — until such period as a law of return
shall be imagined which the intellect can consider as pre
ferable.
Matter, then, irradiated into space with a force varying
as the squares of the distances, might, a priori, be supposed
to return towards its centre of irradiation with a force
varying inversely as the squares of the distances : and I
have already shown* that any principle which will explain
why the atoms should tend, according to any law, to the
general centre, must be admitted as satisfactorily explaining,
at the same time, why, according to the same law, they
should tend each to each. For, in fact, the tendency to the
general centre is not to a centre as such, but because of its
being a point in tending towards which each atom tends
* Page 44.
3*
58 EUREKA.
most directly to its real and essential centre, Unity — the
absolute and final Union of all.
The consideration here involved presents to my own
mind no embarrassment whatever — but this fact does not
blind me to the possibility of its being obscure to those who
may have been less in the habit of dealing with abstrac
tions : — and, upon the whole, it may be as well to look at
the matter from one or two other points of view.
The absolute, irrelative particle primarily created by the
Volition of God, must have been in a condition of positive
normality, or rightfulness — for wrongfulness implies rela
tion. Right is positive ; wrong is negative — is merely the
negation of right ; as cold is the negation of heat — darkness
of light. That a thing may be wrong, it is necessary that
there be some other thing in relation to which it is wrong
— some condition which it fails to satisfy ; some law which
it violates ; some being whom it aggrieves. If there be no
such being, law, or condition, in respect to which the thing
is wrong — and, still more especially, if no beings, laws, or
conditions exist at all — then the thing cannot be wrong and
consequently must be right. Any deviation from normality
involves a tendency to return into it. A difference from
the normal — from the right — from the just — can be under
stood as effected only by the overcoming a difficulty ; and if
the force which overcomes the difficulty be not infinitely
continued, the ineradicable tendency to return will at
length be permitted to act for its own satisfaction. Upon
withdrawal of the force, the tendency acts. This is the
principle of reaction as the inevitable consequence of finite
action. Employing a phraseology of which the seeming
THE UNIVERSE. 59
affectation will be pardoned for its expressiveness, we may
say that Reaction is the return from the condition of as it
is and ought not to be into the condition of as it was, ori
ginally, and therefore ought to be : — and let me add here
that the absolute force of Reaction would no doubt be
always found in direct proportion with the reality — the
truth — the absoluteness — of the originality — if ever it were
possible to measure this latter : — and, consequently, the
greatest of all conceivable reactions must be that produced
by the tendency which we now discuss — the tendency to
return into the absolutely original — into the supremely
primitive. Gravity, then, must be the strongest of forces —
an idea reached a priori and abundantly confirmed by
induction. What use I make of the idea, will be seen in
the sequel.
The atoms, now, having been diffused from their normal
condition of Unity, seek to return to what ? Not to
any particular point, certainly ; for it is clear that if, upon
the diffusion, the whole Universe of matter had been pro
jected, collectively, to a distance from the point of irradi
ation, the atomic tendency to the general centre of the
sphere would not have been disturbed in the least : — the
atoms would not have sought the point in absolute space
from which they were originally impelled. It is merely the
condition, and not the point or locality at which this con
dition took its rise, that these atoms seek to re-establish ; —
it is merely that condition which is their normality, that
they desire. " But they seek a centre," it will be said,
" and a centre is a point/' True ; but they seek this point
not in its character of point — (for, were the whole sphere
moved from its position, they would seek, equally, the cen-
EUREKA.
tre ; and the centre then would be a new point) — but be
cause it so happens, on account of the form in which they
collectively exist — (that of the sphere)— that only through
the point in question — the sphere's centre — they can attain
their true object, Unity. In the direction of the centre
each atom perceives more atoms than in any other direc
tion. Each atom is impelled towards the centre because
along the straight line joining it and the centre and passing
on to the circumference beyond, there lie a greater number
of atoms than along any other straight line — a greater number
of objects that seek it, the individual atom — a greater num
ber of tendencies to Unity — a greater number of satisfactions
for its own tendency to Unity — in a word, because in the
direction of the centre lies the utmost possibility of satis
faction, generally, for its own individual appetite. To be
brief, the condition, Unity, is all that is really sought ; and
if the atoms seem to seek the centre of the sphere, it is only
impliedly, through implication — because such centre hap
pens to imply, to include, or to involve, the only essential
centre, Unity. But on account of this implication or invo
lution, there is no possibility of practically separating the
tendency to Unity in the abstract, from the tendency to
the concrete centre. Thus the tendency of the atoms to
the general centre is, to all practical intents and for all
logical purposes, the tendency each to each ; and the
tendency each to each is the tendency to the centre ; and
the one tendency may be assumed as the other ; whatever
will apply to the one must be thoroughly
