READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Eureka: A Prose Poem — Edgar A. Poe, 1848 — reading text
Part 22 of 27. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Repository OCR — unreviewed
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
probable ; that all the comets of
the system will be absorbed, is more than merely possible \
but, in such case, the principle of absorption must be re
ferred to eccentricity of orbit — to the close approximation
to the Sun, of the comets at their perihelia ; and is a prin
ciple not affecting, in any degree, the ponderous spheres,
which are to be regarded as the true material constituents
of the Universe. — Touching comets, in general, let me here
suggest, in passing, that we cannot be far wrong in looking
upon them as the lightning-flashes of the cosmical Heaven,
The idea of a retarding ether and, through it, of a final
agglomeration of all things, seemed at one time, however,
to* be confirmed by the observation of a positive decrease
in the orbit of the solid moon. By reference to eclipses
recorded 2500 years ago, it was found that the velocity of
the satellite's revolution then was considerably less than it
is now ; that on the hypothesis that its motions in its orbit
is uniformly in accordance with Kepler's law, and was ac
curately determined then — 2500 years ago — it is now in
THE UNIVERSE. 133
advance of the position it should occupy, by nearly 9000
miles. The increase of velocity proved, of course, a diminu
tion of orbit ; and astronomers were fast yielding to a be
lief in an ether, as the sole mode of accounting for the phae-
nomenon, when Lagrange came to the rescue. He showed
that, owing to the configurations of the spheroids, the short
er axes of their ellipses are subject to variation in length ;
the longer axes being permanent ; and that this variation
is continuous and vibratory — so that every orbit is in a
state of transition, either from circle to ellipse, or from el
lipse to circle. In the case of the moon, where the shorter
axis is decreasing, the orbit is passing from circle to ellipse
and, consequently, is decreasing too ; but, after a long series
of ages, the ultimate eccentricity will be attained ; then the
shorter axis will proceed to increase, until the orbit be
comes a circle ; when the process of shortening will again
take place ; — and so on forever. In the case of the Earth,
the orbit is passing from ellipse to circle. The facts thus
demonstrated do away, of course, with all necessity for sup
posing an ether, and with all apprehension of the system's
instability — on the ether's acount.
It will be remembered that I have myself assumed what
we may term an ether. I have spoken of a subtle influence
which we know to be ever in attendance upon matter,
although becoming manifest only through matter's hetero
geneity. To this influence — without daring to touch it at
all in any effort at explaining its awful nature — I have re
ferred the various phenomena of electricity, heat, light, mag
netism ; and more — of vitality, consciousness, and thought
— in a word, of spirituality. It will be seen, at once, then,
134 EUREKA.
that the ether thus conceived is radically distinct from the
ether of the astronomers ; inasmuch as theirs is matter and
mine not.
With the idea of a material ether, seems, thus, to have
departed altogether the thought of that universal agglom
eration so long predetermined by the poetical fancy of
mankind : — an agglomeration in which a sound Philosophy
might have been warranted in putting faith, at least to a
certain extent, if for no other reason than that by this
poetical fancy it had been so predetermined. But so far
as Astronomy — so far as mere Physics have yet spoken, the
cycles of the Universe are perpetual — the Universe has no
conceivable end. Had an end been demonstrated, how
ever, from so purely collateral a cause as an ether, Man's
instinct of the Divine capacity to adapt, would have rebell
ed against the demonstration. We should have been forced
to regard the Universe with some such sense of dissatisfac
tion as we experience in contemplating an unnecessarily
complex work of human art. Creation would have affect
ed us as an imperfect plot in a romance, where the denou-
ment is awkwardly brought about by interposed incidents
external and foreign to the main subject ; instead of spring
ing out of the bosom of the thesis — out of the heart of the
ruling idea — instead of arising as a result of the primary
proposition — as inseparable and inevitable part and parcel
of the fundamental conception of the book.
What I mean by the symmetry of mere surface will
now be more clearly understood. It is simply by the blan
dishment of this symmetry that we have been beguiled into
the general idea of which Madler's hypothesis is but a part
THE UNIVERSE. 135
— the idea of the vorticial indrawing of the orbs. Dismiss
ing this nakedly physical conception, the symmetry of prin
ciple sees the end of all things metaphysically involved in
the thought of a beginning ; seeks and finds in this origin
of all things the rudiment of this end ; and perceives the
impiety of supposing this end likely to be brought about
less simply — less directly — less obviously — less artistically
— than through the reaction of the originating Act.
Recurring, then, to a previous suggestion, let us under
stand the systems — let us understand each star, with its
attendant planets — as but a Titanic atom existing in space
with precisely the same inclination for Unity which char
acterized, in the beginning, the actual atoms after their irra
diation throughout the Universal sphere. As these original
atoms rushed towards each other in generally straight lines,
so let us conceive as at least generally rectilinear, the paths
of the system-atoms towards their respective centres of
aggregation : — and in this direct drav/ing together of the
systems into clusters, with a similar and simultaneous
drawing together of the clusters themselves while under
going consolidation, we have at ler/gth attained the great
Now — the awful Present — the Existing Condition of the
Universe.
Of the still more awful Future a not irrational analogy
may guide us in framing an hypothesis. The equilibrium
between the centripetal and centrifugal forces of each sys
tem, being necessarily destroyed upon attainment of a cer
tain proximity to the nucleus of the cluster to which it
belongs, there must occur, at once, a chaotic or seemingly
chaotic precipitation, of the moons upon the planets, of the
136 EUREKA.
planets upon the suns, and of the suns upon the nuclei ;
and the general result of this precipitation must be the
gathering of the myriad now-existing stars of the firma
ment into an almost infinitely less number of almost infi
nitely superior spheres. In being immeasurably fewer,
the worlds of that day will be immeasurably greater than
our own. Then, indeed, amid unfathomable abysses, will
be glaring unimaginable suns. But all this will be merely
a climacic magnificence foreboding the great End. Of
this End the new genesis described, can be but a very par
tial postponement. While undergoing consolidation, the
clusters themselves, with a speed prodigiously accumula
tive, have been rushing towards their own general centre —
and now, with a thousand-fold electric velocity, commen
surate only with their material grandeur and with the spir
itual passion of their appetite for oneness, the majestic
remnants of the tribe of Stars flash, at length, into a com
mon embrace. The inevitable catastrophe is at hand.
But this catastrophe — what is it ? We have seen ac
complished the ingathering of the orbs. Henceforward,
are we not to understand one material globe of globes as
constituting and comprehending the Universe? Such a
fancy would be altogether at war with every assumption
and consideration of this Discourse.
I have already alluded to that absolute reciprocity of
adaptation which is the idiosyncrasy of the divine Art —
stamping it divine. Up to this point of our reflections, we
have been regarding the electrical influence as a something
by dint of whose repulsion alone Matter is enabled to exist
in that state of diffusion demanded for the fulfilment of
THE UNIVERSE. . 137
its purposes : — so far, in a word, we have been considering
the influence in question as ordained for Matter's sake — to
subserve the objects of matter. With a perfectly legiti
mate reciprocity, we are now permitted to look at Matter,
as created solely for the sake of this influence — solely to
serve the objects of this spiritual Ether. Through the aid
— by the means — through the agency of Matter, and by
dint of its heterogeneity — is this Ether manifested — is
Spirit individualized. It is merely in the development of
this Ether, through heterogeneity, that particular masses of
Matter become animate — sensitive — and in the ratio of
their heterogeneity ; — some reaching a degree of sensitive
ness involving what we call Thought and thus attaining
Conscious Intelligence.
In this view, we are enabled to perceive Matter as a
Means — not as an End. Its purposes are thus seen to have
been comprehended in its diffusion ; and with the return
into Unity these purposes cease. The absolutely consoli
dated globe of globes would be objectless : — therefore not
for a moment could it continue to exist. Matter, created
for an end, would unquestionably, on fulfilment of that end,
be Matter no longer. Let us endeavor to understand that
it would disappear, and that God would remain all in all.
That every work of Divine conception must coexist
and coexpire with its particular design, seems to me espe
cially obvious ; and I make no doubt that, on perceiving
the final globe of globes to be objectless, the majority of my
readers will be satisfied with my " therefore it cannot con
tinue to exist." Nevertheless, as the startling thought of its
instantaneous disappearance is one which the most power-
138 EUREKA.
ful intellect cannot be expected readily to entertain on
grounds so decidedly abstract, let us endeavor to look at
the idea from some other and more ordinary point of view :
— let us see how thoroughly and beautifully it is corrobo
rated in an a posteriori consideration of Matter as we ac
tually find it.
I have before said that " Attraction and Repulsion being
undeniably the sole properties by which Matter is mani
fested to Mind, we are justified in assuming that Matter
exists only as Attraction and Repulsion — in other words
that Attraction and
