READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Eureka: A Prose Poem — Edgar A. Poe, 1848 — reading text
Part 16 of 27. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Repository OCR — unreviewed
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
what we have been in the
practice of designating " nebulae " — and, of these " nebulae,"
one is of paramount interest to mankind. I allude to the
Galaxy, or Milky Way. This interests us, first and most
obviously, on account of its great superiority in apparent
size, not only to any one other cluster in the firmament, but
to all the other clusters taken together. The largest of
these latter occupies a mere point, comparatively, and is
distinctly seen only with the aid of a telescope. The Gal
axy sweeps throughout the Heaven and is brilliantly visible
THE UNIVERSE. 97
to the naked eye. But it interests man chiefly, although
less immediately, on account of its being his home ; the
home of the Earth on which he exists ; the home of the
Sun about which this Earth revolves ; the home of that
" system " of orbs of which the Sun is the centre and pri
mary — the Earth one of sixteen secondaries, or planets —
the Moon one of seventeen tertiaries, or satellites. The
Galaxy, let me repeat, is but one of the clusters which I
have been describing — but one of the mis-called " nebula "
revealed to us — by the telescope alone, sometimes — as faint
hazy spots in various quarters of the sky. We have no
reason to suppose the Milky Way really more extensive
than the least of these " nebulae." Its vast superiority in
size is but an apparent superiority arising from our position
in regard to it — that is to say, from our position in its midst.
However strange the assertion may at first appear to those
unversed in Astronomy, still the astronomer himself has no
hesitation in asserting that we are in the midst of that in
conceivable host of stars — of suns — of systems — which con
stitute the Galaxy. Moreover, not only have we — not only
has our Sun a right to claim the Galaxy as its own especial
cluster, but, with slight reservation, it may be said that all
the distinctly visible stars of the firmament — all the stars
visible to the naked eye — have equally a right to claim it
as their own.
There has been a great deal of misconception in respect
to the shape of the Galaxy ; which, in nearly all our astro
nomical treatises, is said to resemble that of a capital Y.
The cluster in question has, in reality, a certain general —
very general resemblance to the planet Saturn, with its
5
98 EUREKA.
encompassing triple ring. Instead of the solid orb of that
planet, however, we must picture to ourselves a lenticular
star-island, or collection of stars ; our Sun lying excentric-
ally — near the shore of the island — on that side of it which
is nearest the constellation of the Cross and farthest from
that of Cassiopeia. The surrounding 'ring, where it ap
proaches our position, has in it a longitudinal gash, which
does, in fact, cause the ring, in our vicinity, to assume,
loosely, the appearance of a capital Y.
We must not fall into the error, however, of conceiving
the somewhat indefinite girdle as at all remote, compara
tively speaking, from the also indefinite lenticular cluster
which it surrounds ; and thus, for mere purpose of expla
nation, we may speak of our Sun as actually situated at
that point of the Y where its three component lines unite ;
and, conceiving this letter to be of a certain solidity — of a
certain thickness, very trivial in comparison with its length
— we may even speak of our position as in the middle of
this thickness. Fancying ourselves thus placed, we shall
no longer find difficulty in accounting for the phenomena
presented — which are perspective altogether. When we
look upward or downward — that is to say, when we cast
our eyes in the direction of the letter's thickness — we look
through fewer stars than when we cast them in the direction
of its length, or along either of the three component lines.
Of course, in the former case, the stars appear scattered —
in the latter, crowded. — To reverse this explanation : — An
inhabitant of the Earth, when looking, as we commonly ex
press ourselves, at the Galaxy, is then beholding it in some
of the directions of its length — is looking along the lines of
THE UNIVERSE. 99
the Y — but when, looking out into the general Heaven, he
turns his eyes from the Galaxy, he is then surveying it in
the direction of the letter's thickness ; and on this account
the stars seem to him scattered ; while, in fact, they are as
close together, on an average, as in the mass of the cluster.
No consideration could be better adapted to convey an idea
of this cluster's stupendous extent.
If, with a telescope of high space-penetrating power, we
carefully inspect the firmament, we shall become aware of
a belt of clusters — of what we have hitherto called " nebu
lae " — a band, of varying breadth, stretching from horizon
to horizon, at right angles to the general course of the Milky
Way. This band is the ultimate cluster of clusters. This
belt is The Universe. Our Galaxy is but one, and perhaps
one of the most inconsiderable, of the clusters which go to
the constitution of this ultimate, Universal belt or band.
The appearance of this cluster of clusters, to our eyes, as a
belt or band, is altogether a perspective phenomenon of the
same character as that which causes us to behold our own
individual and roughly -spherical cluster, the Galaxy, under
guise also of a belt, traversing the Heavens at right angles
to the Universal one. The shape of the all-inclusive clus
ter is, of course generally, that of each individual cluster
which it includes. Just as the scattered stars which, on
looking from the Galaxy, we see in the general sky, are, in
fact, but a portion of that Galaxy itself, and as closely in
termingled with it as any of the telescopic points in what
seems the densest portion of its mass — so are the scattered
" nebulas " which, on casting our eyes from the Universal
belt, we perceive at all points of the firmament — so, I say,
100 EUREKA.
are these scattered " nebulae " to be understood as only
perspectively scattered, and as part and parcel of the one
supreme and Universal sphere.
f" No astronomical fallacy is more untenable, and none
has been more pertinaciously adhered to, than that of the
absolute illimitation of the Universe of Stars. The reasons
for limitation, as I have already assigned them, a priori,
seem to me unanswerable ; but, not to speak of these, obser
vation assures us that there is, in numerous directions around
us, certainly, if not in all, a positive limit — or, at the very
least, affords us no basis whatever for thinking otherwise.
Were the succession of stars endless, then the background
of the sky would present us an uniform luminosity, like that
displayed by the Galaxy — since there could be absolutely no
point, in all that background, at which would not exist a
star. The only mode, therefore, in which, under such a
state of affairs, we could comprehend the voids which our
telescopes find in innumerable directions, would be by sup
posing the distance of the invisible background so immense
that no ray from it has yet been able to reach us at all.
That this may be so, who shall venture to deny ? I main
tain, simply, that we have not even the shadow of a reason
for believing that it is so.
When speaking of the vulgar propensity to regard all
bodies on the Earth as tending merely to the Earth's centre,
I observed that, "with certain exceptions to be specified
hereafter, every body on the Earth tended not only to the
Earth's centre, but in every conceivable direction besides/'*
The " exceptions " refer to those frequent gaps in the Hea-
* Page 62.
THE UNIVERSE. 101
yens, where our utmost scrutiny can detect not only no
stellar bodies, but no indications of their existence : — where
yawning chasms, blacker than Erebus, seem to afford us
glimpses, through the boundary walls of the Universe of
Stars, into the illimitable Universe of Vacancy, beyond.
Now as any body, existing on the Earth, chances to pass,
either through its own movement or the Earth's, into a line
with any one of these voids, or cosmical abysses, it clearly
is no longer attracted in the direction of that void, and
for the moment, consequently, is " heavier " than at any
period, either after or before. Independently of the con
sideration of these voids, however, and looking only at the
generally unequable distribution of the stars, we see that
the absolute tendency of bodies on the Earth to the Earth's
centre, is in a state of perpetual variation.
We comprehend, then, the insulation of our Universe.
We perceive the isolation of that — of all that which we
grasp with the senses. We know that there exists one
cluster of clusters — a collection around which, on all sides,
extend the immeasurable wildernesses of a Space to all hu
man perception untenanted. But because upon the confines
of this Universe of Stars we are compelled to pause, through
want of farther evidence from the senses, is it right to con
clude that, in fact, there is no material point beyond that
which we have thus been permitted to attain ? Have we,
or have we not, an analogical right to the inference that
this perceptible Universe — that this cluster of clusters — is
but one of a series of clusters of clusters, the rest of which
are invisible through distance — through the diffusion of their
light being so excessive, ere it reaches us, as not to produce
102 EUREKA.
upon our retinas a light-impression — or from there being no
such emanation as light at all, in these unspeakably distant
worlds — or, lastly, from the mere interval being so vast, that
the electric tidings of their presence in Space, have not yet
— through the lapsing myriads of years — been enabled to
traverse that interval ?
Have we any right to inferences — have we any ground
whatever for visions such as these ? If we have a right to
them in any degree, we have a right to their infinite exten
sion.
The human brain has obviously a leaning to the " Infi
nite," and fondles the phantom of the idea. It seems to
long with a passionate fervor for this impossible conception,
with the hope of intellectually believing it when conceived.
What is general among the whole race of Man, of course
no individual of that race can be warranted in considering
abnormal ; nevertheless, there may
