READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — February 11, 2013 — David Sherry Presentation — reading text
Part 1 of 1. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 25-David Sherry Presentation.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
East Pass Inlet Management Plan
David Sherry – April 16, 2013
1
Draft IMP
* The study's flaws.
* No bypass commitments.
* Self fulfilling prophesies compound errors.
* Collateral damage.
* Uncertainty / Battles at every dredge.
2
Updrift / Downdrift
Why should we care?
3
4
The Report
The premise: Erosion from 1996 to 2007 due
to transport reversal.
“At beach profile R-18 immediately east of the
inlet, the shoreline has retreated 282 feet
between 1996 and 2007 for an annual rate
of -25.6 ft/yr.”
5
The Data
Date Shoreline feet from monument
Nov, 1995 1408
Mar, 1996 1466
Oct, 1996 1402
Jan, 1998 1442
Jun, 2004 1583
Sep, 2005 1201
Jun, 2007 1183
Jun, 2008 1241
6
Q. So this alleged transport to the east is solely
because of hurricanes --
A. It's --
Q. -- in your --
A. It seems to be, you know, strongly due to
hurricanes. The big difference during the last
couple of years versus the preceding years, it
seems to be a strong indicator of the hurricane
force.”
7
8
9
10
11
“Q. And so where is the sand that's being
transport sand from that R17 area going?
A. Most likely into the inlet.
Q. Into the inlet itself?
A. Right.”
12
“It has been determined and accepted that
the littoral drift in the Panhandle area is
from east to west. This being the case,
Okaloosa Island beaches are giving up
sand daily which is redistributed along
the beaches on Eglin property.”
13
14
The Theories
Seawall below MHWL – Jan 31, 2006
Transport reversal – Feb 19, 2007
Hurricanes – Feb 12, 2009
Localized Accelerated Transport
The evidence and ramifications
15
Where's the bulge? Why dredge?
16
17
“Since it is just a study and we are running
out of time, we could perhaps pick one
and go for it, but I would like to make
clear that this calibration is not one we
should be very talkative about, the
large deposition in the ebb shoal and the
amount of scour in the channel are very
different from the observed patterns
and this makes me a bit nervous,
18
if there was time I would suggesting
trying a lot more to make things look
better. Again, since it is a study, and
we will be focusing on relative changes
in inlet management practices I believe
the model is suited to meet the project
goals, but if a skeptical type gets
their hands in this calibration that
can be quite harsh on us.”
19
“Q. So you changed the calibration of these
little hot spot areas --
A. Yes.
Q. -- from .29 millimeters to 2 millimeters
without any data to support it?
A. That's correct.
20
21
So why is East Pass so different?
22
If all this sounds familiar....
23
Self fulfilling prophesies
compound errors.
24
Collateral Damage
25
Conclusions
26
“The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
determined in studies in 1983 to 1992...that
sand no longer enters the East Pass inlet.”
14
2,379,753
27
“The materials that are maintenance-dredged
originated in the Appalachian Mountains
and are transported down the river systems
into Choctawhatchee Bay and from there
through the East Pass inlet into the Gulf of
Mexico.”
3, 5, <1
28
29
30
