READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 04-22-08 regular agenda — reading text
Part 4 of 37. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-15418-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
City should
pursue the avenue of boating improvement funds before putting user fees on boat launches as he did
not want to fund the whole park with a user fee to launch and recover his boat and expressed it is
unfair to put the maintenance of the whole park on the back of the boaters. He would agree if the
ordinance stated the purpose would be to use the fee for all boating facilities in the City but opposed
it if the fee is spent all over the parks. He suggested Council send the ordinance back to be redone
to justify why they need the fees, where the fees will go, and why the City has not gone through the
State boater' s improvement fund to get fees.
Tiffany Spence ( no address given) voiced her opposition to the $ 5. 00 fee at Liza Jackson Park as
she expressed her views that the park is for the whole community, it was not fair because they all
pay taxes, and it is taxing one group of people to fix a problem.
Barbara deVaux, 348 Marie Circle, spoke against the $ 5. 00 fee at Liza Jackson and expressed her
views that it penalizes the citizens and they should not have to pay a fee to launch their boats.
Regular Council 4 -8 -08 M
ORD. 1760 cont.
Kevin McDaniel, 1046 Quail Hollow Drive, Mary Esther, expressed concern that the $ 5. 00 fee at
Liza Jackson Park which is small now will grow and grow and expressed his views that this is a
and suggested there be a
boating tY and theY should not be charged to launch their boats,
g community
fee to enter the park.
As no one further wished to speak the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Miller moved to adopt Ord. 1760 on first reading as amended to change Section III, line
At Liza
38 to read, " Establish Parking, Docking, and Boat Launch/Recovery', and delete `
Jackson Park'. Mr. Garvie seconded motion.
Discussion ensued with an exchange of views on the move toward user fees to offset the decrease in
taxes.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion and it carried by a vote of 4 to 2 with Holmes,
Miller, Garvie, and Pullen in favor and Reeves and Minich opposed (Hartwell absent).
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
The City Manager reported that the item on the Sunshine Laws and Communications with Council
and Charter Officers and the item on Comments and Reprimands for Charter Officers have been
removed from future agenda as Councilman Hartwell asked they be prepared as reports to Council
rather than as workshop items. The City Manager requested that the annexation process be moved
to the May 13th workshop; that a Budget Policy Workshop be held on May 20th and the Charter
17th.
Review Workshop scheduled for May 20th be moved to June It was noted that the budget
policy workshop will include Councilman Pullen' s item on the reorganization of City staff, and staff
will address the golf club funding issue.
Mr. Minich moved to approve the Future Agenda Items as modified by the City Manager.
Mr. Holmes seconded motion and it carried unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves,
Garvie, Pullen, and Minich in favor (Hartwell absent).
ORD. 1760: BOAT LAUNCH/RECOVERY AND OVERNIGHT DOCKING FEES
Dr. Pullen expressed he wanted to change his vote on Ord. 1760. Dr. Pullen moved to reconsider
Ord. 1760. Motion died for lack of second.
AUTOMATIC AID BETWEEN FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Consideration of a request for Council approval of the Agreement for Automatic Aid between Area
Fire Departments and Department of Public Safety.
Mike Dutton, Fire Chief, briefly explained this is a yearly event and no Fire Department can comply
with OSHA' s two in, two out requirement without assistance from other departments. He explained
the two in, two out requirement means there have to be two outside before two can go inside to
attempt a rescue.
The Mayor opened the floor for public input. As there was none public input was closed.
to the Agreement for Automatic Aid between area Fire
Mr. Garvie moved approve
Departments and Department of Public Safety. Mr. Holmes seconded motion and it carried
Hartwell
unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Pullen, and Minich in favor (
absent).
Regular Council 4 -8 -08
8
RES. 08 -10: EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
Discussion of the 2008 Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the City of Fort Walton Beach
Comprehensive Plan; states the intent of the City to amend the Comprehensive Plan based upon
recommendations contained in the report; approving transmittal of the report to the Department of
Community Affairs in accordance with Section 163. 3191, Florida Statutes; and setting an effective
date.
Samantha Abell, Senior Planner, reported Council will consider Res. 08 -10, adopting the 2008
Council meeting. She then went through
22nd
Evaluation and Appraisal Report ( EAR) at the April
the contents of the draft EAR.
The Mayor opened the floor for public input. As there was none the public input was closed.
CDBG UPDATE
Status update of the Community Development Block Grant.
Missy McKim, CDS Director, gave an update on the status of the Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG). She pointed out the schedule for FY 08/ 09 shows the Citizens Advisory Committee
St,
CAC) meeting was held on March 31 the Public Hearing to present the Grant amount for next
9th,
year and provide applications was held April the Public Service Applications are due May
7th,
the Citizens Advisory Committee to review the applications and make recommendation to
meetix
and 15 , the CDBG Draft Annual Action Plan is to be complete
12th
staff are scheduled for May
and City Council consideration of the Annual Action Plan for FY 08/09
20th,
and submitted by May
on June
24th
then submitted to HUD. She reported the amount of funding for 08/ 09 is $ 141, 267.
She mentioned staff is working with Patti Sunnarborg on the Contract between Okaloosa Housing
Partners ( OHP formerly Okaloosa Community Development Corporation) and the City for OHP to
and future years, and the
administer the CDBG funds for the City for the remainder of this year
CAC is reviewing the revised Citizen Participation Plan prior to it being brought to Council.
It was questioned whether an ordinance would need to be amended in order for the Citizens
Advisory Committee to remain an advisory committee to staff and not be appointed by Council as
suggested by Dr. Pullen at the CAC meeting. The CDS Director stated there would be no ordinance
change needed and explained the Citizen Advisory Committee for the CDBG has always been just a
citizen committee of representatives from the low income areas and that has advised staff on how to
Public Service
spend the grant funds for that year; they have reviewed the applications for the 15%
portion of the grant, prioritized them and recommended funding levels, then that was carried
forward in the Annual Action Plan presented by staff to City Council. She mentioned the comment
that the CAC should be a formalized committee was taken to the committee but they felt they are
more effective if they are able to communicate more freely amongst themselves, with staff, and the
community and felt they are really just a liaison between the community and staff on CDBG,
especially as it moves forward to Okaloosa Housing Partners administration.
Dr. Pullen explained he recommended the committee not be named by Council because there are a
lot of committees that cause a lot of work for staff and also because it will be administered by the
Okaloosa Housing Partners which does not fall under the Sunshine Law and the committee would
then work with Patti Sunnarborg. He felt there would still be citizen participation without adding to
the workload of staff and without becoming a stumbling block between the grant and the Okaloosa
Housing Partners.
Regular Council 4 -8 -08 89
CDBG UPDATE cont.
The CDS Director commented the Citizens Advisory Committee is not required by HUD and HUD
has very specific requirements for advertising, which the City has met and the committee is over
and above the requirement
q of HUD so keepingg it informal is more in keeping it within the strict
requirements of HUD; however, they will still be useful in advising staff.
There was some question on whether or not the committee is exempt from the Sunshine Law
because they are not a formalized committee. The City Attorney said whether or not they are
subject to the Sunshine Law depends on their role. She said that committee is advisory to staff and
because it has no recommendation authority would preclude it from being subject to the Open
Meeting requirements of Chapter 286. She said it is not whether or not Council appoints them, it is
what their job and role is that determines whether or not they are subject to the Sunshine Law.
There was some question whether the committee advises Council with a recommendation on the
Annual Action Plan. The CDS Director explained the recommendation in the Annual Action Plan
is staff s recommendation and all but one year staff has been in total agreement with the CAC on
how to allocate funding, and both were presented to Council. She has always taken their
recommendation as just advising staff.
The City Attorney stated if the committee is advisory and fact finding, they would not be subject to
the Sunshine Law, but that can be researched within the context of the Agreement with OHP to
make sure it is clear on what their requirements are and that they satisfy whatever needs there are at
the City level. She said the key is whether or not they are advisory and have recommendation
authority, but advisory to staff is different than advisory to Council. The CDS Director added her
thought that the CAC would like to remain advisory to staff. Dr. Pullen added his thought that is
how Patti Sunnarborg would like it to remain.
Dr. Pullen explained his concern was there were no records and if someone had gone to the General
Accounting Office they may have wanted the money back, so he was hoping to get it to meet all the
Federal requirements.
The CDS Director stated that HUD has very strict and specific requirements for advertising, and in
the Annual Action Plan as well as in the Consolidated Annual Plan at the end of the year they have
to provide copies of proof of advertising that was done. She said they
