READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 02-23-2010 Regular — reading text
Part 43 of 51. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-25149-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Mike Anderson, Mayor
ATTEST: Approved for form and legal sufficiency,
L
r
OA- 4 tt
Helen Spencer, City Clerk Toni r.Craig, City Attorney 0
New language is underlined; deleted language is FAFioken
Codification Instructions:
Sections of this Ordinance to be codified: Section 2
Placement: Amends Volume 11, Chapter 1. 05 as stated
A m Find 511212009
149-
THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
150-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 23, 2010
Discussion - Direction - Action
Discussion
Lawsuit against Merrill Lynch for General Employee
Pension Fund losses
Synopsis: Following Beggs & Lane attorneys presentation at the
21912010 Special Council Meeting, Council requested a continuance
to give additional time to review the information andfee structure
Agenda Item Number: 9. 2
Page 1 of 4
Carole Jones
From: Toni Craig [toni @tonicraig. info]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3: 14 PM
To: Carole Jones
Cc: Robert Mearns
Subject: RE: Draft fee language; Gen Pension Board, Merrill Lynch
Bob
This is the second and final email as backup for the Feb 23 agenda item regarding Merrill Lynch.
Toni L. Craig
Attorney at Law
Fla Bar No 115444
850) 243 -6969
www.tonicrig .info
From: Jim Linn [ mailto:jlinn @llw- law.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2: 59 PM
To: Toni Craig
Cc: Robert Mearns
Subject: RE: Draft fee language; Gen Pension Board, Merrill Lynch
Toni,
Sorry for my delay in getting back to you —I was on the road almost all last week.
As I previously indicated, I have never been a party to a contingent fee arrangement with any governmental entity I
have represented, and I am not really interested in doing that now.
That said, I do not believe the City is precluded from entering into a contingent fee arrangement in a matter such as
this.
If the City wants me to provide assistance to Mr. Miller et al, and keep abreast of the case, the City may prefer to
handle my fees through a contingent fee arrangement rather than hourly billing. If this is the City' s preference, I will
certainly abide by it.
Otherwise, I would be pleased to provide assistance to Mr. Miller and his team as you direct, and bill the City for my
services per my existing hourly fee arrangement with the City.
Jim
James W. Linn
Lewis, Longman & Walker, P. A.
Post Office Box 16098
Tallahassee, FL 32317
Phone: ( 850) 222 -5702
Fax: ( 850) 224 -9242
jlinn @
- llw _
law.com
www. 11w - law. com
Lewis, Longman & Walker, P. A. is proud to be an ABA -EPA Law Office Climate Challenge Partner. Think before you print!
The information contained in this transmission may be legally privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you received this communication in error, and that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the message and all
copies of it.
Circular 230 notice: pursuant to regulations issued by the IRS, to the extent this communication (or any attachment) concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be
151-
2/ 17/ 2010 -
Page 2 of 4
used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax -related penalties under the internal revenue code or (ii) marketing or recommending to another party any tax -
related matter addressed within. Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the individual' s circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
From: Toni Craig [ mailto: toni@tonicraig. info]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1: 17 PM
To: Jim Linn
Cc: ' Robert Mearns'
Subject: FW: Draft fee language; Gen Pension Board, Merrill Lynch
Jim
Last night Greg Miller of Beggs & Lane came to Council for a decision about litigation vs. Merrill Lynch. He gave a copy
of the attached agenda information and then handed me the Attorney Client Agreement. 1 questioned the fee
arrangement, and this is the response 1 got from Mr. Miller today. Are you interested in being involved in the litigation
for this split fee?
Otherwise, do you think this is a reasonable contingency fee arrangement for the expected work to be completed?
Please note my new email address: toni @tonicraig. info
Toni L. Craig Attorney at Law
Fla Bar No 115444
Board Certified, City, County, Local Government Law
PO Box 2917
105 Lewis Street Suite 102
Fort Walton Beach FL 32549
850) 243 -6969 Fax: ( 850) 244 -8929
www.tonicraig. fo
. infoi
Marital & Family Law
Local Government Law
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you received this email in error, please notify me immediately, delete
the email from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you are not an existing client of Toni L. Craig, Attorney at Law, do not
construe anything in this email as legal advice or to make you a client. Do not disclose anything to me in any reply that you expect to be kept confidential. If
you are a client, you should keep the contents of this email confidential to preserve the attorney -client or work product privilege.
From: Gregory Miller [ mailto: grm @b eggslane.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9: 56 AM
To: toni @tonicraig. info
Cc: dledbetter@dlsecuritieslaw. com; David McGee; gdeloach @dlsecuritieslaw.com; Gregory Miller; pmougey@levinlaw.com
Subject: Draft fee language
Dear Ms. Craig,
The two inserts below are alternative fee arrangements similar to ones we' ve used in other
cases.
The first arrangement passes work onto the shoulders of the pension fund' s legal counsel, and
pension staff,
and reduces our fee recovery.
The second arrangement is a bit different. In this regard a private attorney who normally
charges a pension fund an hourly fee for guidance / service to his /her client agrees, in this
instance, to take his /her fees on a contingent basis for work he / she does in relation to
assisting the litigation of the fund' s claims against Merrill Lynch. In a number of cases we
agreed to share a portion of our recovery with private attorneys who serve as retained legal
counsel to public pension funds.
By separate written agreement with those attorneys, we agreed
to share 10% of our legal fees with the board' s private counsel in exchange for work to' be
performed by that counsel. For example, if legal fees totaled 33 & 1/ 3% of an award, the
fund' s private attorney would receive 3 & 1/ 3% of the total award. In other words, the board' s
2/ 17/ 2010 - 152-
Page 3 of 4
attorney would receive 10% of the total legal fee due the three other firms.
Should either of the arrangements below be chosen by the fund' s board, additional revisions
will need to be made to the draft fee agreement I presented to you last night for review.
Best Regards,
Greg
EXAMPLE 1
2. Consideration. In consideration of the services to be rendered by Attorneys on behalf of
Client, pursuant to this Agreement, Client agrees to compensate Attorneys with a contingent fee
of the following percentage( s) of the total recovery.
A. If recovery is made before the filing of an answer or the demand for appointment of
arbitrators if no answer is filed or no demand for appointment of arbitrators
or,
is made, the
expiration of the time period provided for such action:
i. 30 % of any recovery up to $ 1 million; plus
ii. 27% of any portion of the recovery between $ 1 million and $ 2 million; plus
iii. 18% of any portion of the recovery exceeding $ 2 million.
B. If recovery is made after the filing of an answer or the demand for appointment of
if no answer is filed or no demand for appointment of arbitrators is made, the
arbitrators or,
expiration of the time period provided for such action, through the entry of judgment:
i. 31 1/ 2% of any recovery up to $ 1 million; plus
ii. 27% of any portion of the recovery between $ 1 million and $ 2 million; plus
iii. 18% of any portion of the recovery exceeding $ 2 million.
C. In consideration of Attorneys reducing their contingency fee percentages to the amounts
set forth above, Client' s board attorneys and pension staff shall provide the following
assistance to Attorneys:
i. Provide institutional knowledge ( e. g., factual background) to the Attorneys;
ii. Interface between the Client and Attorneys, and seek Client' s guidance and approvals when
necessary;
iii. Identify, locate and interface with witnesses needed for depositions and document
production;
iv. Assist the Attorneys in obtaining documents and records maintained by Client' s pension
staff; and,
V. Assist in other ways as mutually agreed upon by the Attorneys and Client.
EXAMPLE 2
Using the same fee percentages as contained in the draft fee agreements that were presented to
you at the meeting of the counsel last evening)
6. Associate Counsel. Client, after being fully informed of the nature of the relationships
provided for herein, approves the association of the firm of as Associate Counsel and
agrees that the Attorneys' fees set forth above will include fees due Associate Counsel, which
In this
fees shall be divided based upon the work performed by
