READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Resolution — 2013-19 - Adopt FY 2013-14 Community Dev Block Grant — reading text
Part 10 of 12. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-32121-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
supportive
housing for persons leaving mental / physical health facilities.
BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1. Has the grantee described public policies that affect affordable housing?
Yes® NO[] Verification found on page 9.
Factors which affect affordable housing may include:
Building and zoning codes;
Environmental problems;
Impact fees;
Cost of land; and
Incentive programs such as tax abatement or down -payment assistance.
Note: For Urban Counties, does the discussion include factors in both
incorporated and unincorporated areas?
STRATEGIC PLAN ( 91. 215) - N/ A FOR ANNUAL PLAN
When reviewing this section of the Consolidated Plan, keep in mind that the
priorities /objectives should relate to the needs identified in the Housing and Homeless
Needs and Housing and Market Analysis sections.
GENERAL
1. Does the grantee describe the basis for assigning the priority given to each category
in Table 2A?
Yes No
2. Has the grantee identified any obstacles to meeting underserved needs?
Yes No Verification found on page
3. Has the grantee summarized the priorities and specific objectives, describing how
funds that are reasonably expected to be made available will be used to address
identified needs? See Tables IA, 1B, 1C, 2A, 213, and 2C
Yes NO[]
4. For each specific objective, has the grantee identified proposed accomplishments
and outcomes the jurisdiction hopes to achieve in quantitative terms over a specific
time period, or in other measurable terms as identified and defined by the
jurisdiction? See Tables SA, 1B, IC, 2A, 213 and 2C
Yes No
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1. Did the grantee state how the analysis of the housing market and the severity of
housing problems and needs of extremely low- income, low- income, and moderate -
income renters and owners identified in accordance with 91. 205 provided the basis
for assigning the relative priority given to each priority needs category in the priority
housing needs table prescribed by HUD?
Yes No[] Verification found on page
2. Does the affordable housing section identify how the characteristics of the housing
market will influence the use of funds made available for rental assistance,
production of new units, rehabilitation of old units, or acquisition of existing units?
Yes No Verification found on page
Note: If the jurisdiction intends to use HOME funds for tenant -based rental
assistance or plans to use HOME funds to assist persons with special needs, the plan
must specify local market conditions that led to the choice of that option.
3. Does the grantee described proposed accomplishments to specify the number of
extremely low, low, moderate, and middle income families to whom the grantee will
provide affordable housing as defined in 24 CFR 92. 252 for rental housing and 24
CFR 92. 254 for homeownership over a specific time period?
Yes No Verification found on page
HOMELESSNESS
1. Does the grantee describe the strategy for helping low- income families avoid
becoming homeless?
Yes No Verification found on page
2. Does the grantee describe the jurisdiction' s strategy for reaching out to homeless
persons and assessing their individual needs?
Yes[-] No Verification found on page
3. Does the grantee describe the jurisdiction' s strategy for addressing the emergency
shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons?
Yes No Verification found on page
4. Does the grantee describe the jurisdiction' s strategy for helping homeless persons
especially persons that are chronically homeless) make the transition to permanent
housing and independent living?
Yes No Verification found on page
OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS
1. With respect to supportive needs of the non - homeless, does the plan describe the
priority housing and supportive service needs of persons who are not homeless but
may or may not require supportive housing?
Yes No Verification found on page
NON -MOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1. Did the grantee describe the priority non -housing community development needs,
reflecting the needs for the type of activity? Table 2B ( required)
Yes No
Note: The Community Development component of the plan must state the
grantee' s specific long - term and short- term community development objectives
including economic development activities that create jobs) that must be
developed in accordance with the statutory goals described in 24 CFR 91. 1 and
the primary objectives of the CDBG program.
2. Is the grantee requesting approval of a Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area?
Yes No
If YES, does it meet the requirements of CPD Notice 96 -1 and include outcomes?
Yes No
Note: Separate documentation should be maintained to verify compliance with
CPD Notice 96 -1.
BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1. Does the grantee describe the jurisdiction' s strategy to remove or ameliorate
negative effects of public policies, that serve as barriers to affordable housing as
identified in the needs assessment section?
Yes® No Verification found on page 9.
LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARDS
1. Does the plan outline the actions proposed or being taken to evaluate and reduce
lead - based paint hazards, describe how the plan for reduction of lead -based paint
hazards is related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards, and how the plan for
reduction will be integrated into housing policies and programs?
Yes® No Verification found on page 8.
ANTI -POVERTY STRATEGY
1. Does the grantee describe the jurisdiction' s goals, programs, and policies for
reducing the number of poverty level families?
Yes No[-] Verification found on page
Has the grantee programs such as:
Family Self- sufficiency
Head Start
Sate and Local Programs
Section 3
Welfare to Work
Workforce Development Initiative
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
1. Does the grantee explain the institutional structure, including private industry,
nonprofit organizations, community and faith -based organizations, and public
institutions, through which the jurisdiction will carry out its housing, homeless, and
community development plan, assessing the strengths and gaps in the delivery
system?
Yes No Verification found on page
COORDINATION
1. Does the plan identify the jurisdiction' s activities to enhance coordination between
public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental
health, and service agencies?
Yes No Verification found on page
2. With respect to the public entities involved, does the plan describe the means of
cooperation among the state and local units of government in the metropolitan area
for problems that go beyond a single jurisdiction, ( i. e. transportation, workforce,
economic development) in the implementation of the plan?
Yes No Verification found on page
3. With respect the homeless strategy, does the plan describe efforts to enhance
coordination among agencies to address the needs of persons that are chronically
homeless?
Yes No Verification found on page
4. With respect to economic development, does the plan describe efforts to enhance
coordination with private industry, businesses, developers, and social service
agencies.
Yes No Verification found on page
PUBLIC HousrNG
1. Does the grantee describe the jurisdiction' s activities to encourage public housing
residents to become more involved in management and participate in
homeownership?
Yes® No Verification found on page 9.
2. Has the grantee describe the manner in which the plan of the jurisdiction will help
address the needs of public housing?
Yes No[-] Verification found on page
Note: Amended to Title 1 October 21, 1998 Section 105( b)( 11)
3. Is the grantee served by a troubled PHA as designated by HUD?
Yes[] NOM
If YES, Has the grantee in which any troubled public housing agency is located,
described the manner in which the State or unit of local government will provide
financial or other assistance to such troubled agency in improving its operations to
remove such designation?
Yes No® Verification found on page 9.
Note: Amended to Title 1 October 21, 1998 Section 105( g)
ACTION PLAN f91. 2201
1. Has the Standard 424 Form for the applicable programs been included with the
correct dollar allocations and signed by the appropriate official?
Yes® No
2. Is the DUNS number listed?
Yes® No
3. Did the grantee describe the geographic areas of the jurisdiction ( including areas of
low income and /or racial / minority concentration) in which assistance will be directed
during the next year.
Yes® NOM
4. Did the grantee describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within
the jurisdiction ( or within the EMSA for HOPWA) ( 91. 215( a)( 1)) during the next year
and the rationale for assigning the priorities.
Yes® No
RESOURCES
1. Has the grantee described the Federal Resources, and private and non - Federal
public resources expected to be available to address priority needs and specific
objectives identified in the plan?
Yes® No[:] Verification found on page 4 -5.
2. Did the grantee describe how HOME and /or ESG matching requirements will be
satisfied?
Yes No N / A® Verification found on page
ACTIVITIES 91. 22O( D)
a) Has the grantee described the CDBG funded activities for the program year in
a complete manner?
Yes® No Verification found on page 11 - 13.
b) Has the grantee described the HOME funded activities for the program year in
a complete manner? See Table 3C
Yes NON n/ a
c) Has the grantee described the ESG funded activities for the program year in a
complete manner? See Table 3C
Yes No® n/ a
d) Has the grantee described the HOPWA funded activities for the program year
in a complete manner? See Table 3C
Yes[] No® n/ a
2. Does the action plan contain a summary of priorities and specific annual objectives
that will be addressed during the program year?
Yes® No Verification found on page 11 - 12.
Note: The Jurisdiction should use summary of annual objectives as identified in
Table 3A of the Consolidated Plan.
3. Do the proposed activities correspond to the priority needs identified /local specific
objectives listed in the Consolidated Plan?
Yes® No Verification found on page 11 - 12.
10
Note: The ] urisdiction should use priority needs as identified in Table 2A and 28
