READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 09-16-08 workshop agenda — reading text
Part 42 of 50. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-16927-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
registered voters voting on a referred
ordinance vote against it, it shall be considered repealed upon certification of
the election results.
3) Recall. Ballots used at recall elections shall read: " Shall [ name] be
recalled ( removed) from the office of ?" If a majority of the
registered voters voting on a proposed recall vote in its favor, the official is
removed and the winning candidate for successor, if any, shall be elected as a
replacement for the duration of the unexpired term. Otherwise the vacancy
shall be filled in accordance with § 2. 06 ( c).
Commentary.
Unlike other provisions, this article must be completely self -executing. Detail should not be filled in
by the council because these devices guard against possible inadequacies of council.
51
a) Neither the initiative nor the referendum should be applicable to the budget, capital program,
any ordinance relating to the appropriation of money or the levy of taxes, or, of course, to salaries of
city officers or employees, for this would interfere with responsible officials striving to achieve a
properly balanced long -range fiscal program. Recall should not apply to recently elected officials,
because officials need time to establish themselves in office, and because election results should not
be promptly challenged by another election.
b) Requiring a petitioners' committee places clear responsibility for the undertaking of initiative,
citizen referendum, or recall proceedings.
c) The number of signatures required for initiative and referendum petitions in the seventh edition
was fifteen percent of the total number registered to vote at the last regular city election. The eighth
edition permits charter drafters to decide upon a reasonable threshold for their city, chosen from a
range equal to or greater than five percent but less than or equal to ten percent of registered voters to
vote at the last city election. The percentage used should neither be too easy nor too burdensome.
Communities typically require more signatures for recall petitions than for initiative and referendum
petitions. In determining the recall percentage, drafters should consider distinguishing between at-
large and district offices.
Limiting the period for filing a referendum petition to thirty days after passage insures that the
effective date of an ordinance will not be delayed unless the referendum effort is of serious
proportions. The timing of the recall procedure prevents the threat of recall from pending without
limitation. The time period for signature collection should be reasonably related to the signature
requirement and the size of the city, within the provided range of 40 to 160 days.
d) The mandatory language prevents the city clerk from delaying certification of the sufficiency or
insufficiency of petitions beyond the twenty days specified.
e)
The fact that filing a referendum petition with the city clerk suspends the effective date of an
ordinance will spur the city clerk and the council into prompt action on the question of sufficiency.
When an ordinance is subjected to a referendum vote and the council's action is sustained,
termination of the suspension must be delayed until sufficient time has passed for official
determination of the election results. This will vary with local practice. The thirty days indicated in
6. 04( e) ( iv) is arbitrary. If there is a definite provision for the official reporting of election results,
the lifting of the suspension should probably coincide with the reporting.
f) This section mandates council consideration of the proposed " initiative ordinance" and
reconsideration of the " referred ordinance" prior to the circulation of petitions and the ensuing
ballot question. The words " adopt a proposed initiative ordinance without any change in substance"
permit correction of technical imperfections.
If an election is necessary, provisions for submitting a proposed or referred ordinance to the voters,
or ordering a recall election, permit considerable latitude as to the election date to encourage
holding the vote at a regular election if possible.
52
One of the most important reasons for requiring a petitioners' committee is to provide a mechanism
for withdrawing an initiative, referendum, or recall petition if those originating the proceedings
change their minds or feel that action of the council satisfies the need which prompted the petition.
g) Initiative ordinances approved by the electorate become effective, just as is the case with an
ordinance passed by council, in thirty days or at whatever later date is specified.
Article VII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Introduction.
All communities should have fully developed provisions dealing with the ethical expectations
essential to responsible government.Ethics provisions foster public trust in the integrity of city
government and serve as a check on improper or abusive behavior by city officials and employees.
Communities should also have a comprehensive campaign finance code requiring, at the least,
disclosure of sources of money used in the campaign for city office. The amount of money flowing
into local races continues to grow and must be regulated to help avoid the public perception of
corruption.
Section 7. 01. Conflicts of Interest; Board of Ethics.
a) Conflicts of Interest. The use of public office for private gain is prohibited. The city
council shall implement this prohibition by ordinance, the terms of which shall include, but
not be limited to: acting in an official capacity on matters in which the official has a private
financial interest clearly separate from that of the general public; the acceptance of gifts
and other things of value; acting in a private capacity on matters dealt with as a public
official; the use of confidential information; and appearances by city officials before other
city agencies on behalf of private interests. This ordinance shall include a statement of
purpose and shall provide for reasonable public disclosure of finances by officials with
major decision -making authority over monetary expenditures and contractual and
regulatory matters and, insofar as permissible under state law, shall provide for fines and
imprisonment for violations.
b) Board of Ethics. The city council shall, by ordinance, establish an independent board
of ethics to administer and enforce the conflict of interest and financial disclosure
ordinances. No member of the board may hold elective or appointed office under the city
or any other government or hold any political party office. Insofar as possible under state
law, the city council shall authorize the board to issue binding advisory opinions, conduct
investigations on its own initiative and on referral or complaint from officials or citizens,
subpoena witnesses and documents, refer cases for prosecution, impose administrative
fines, and to hire independent counsel. The city council shall appropriate sufficient funds to
the board of ethics to enable it to perform the duties assigned to it and to provide annual
training and education of city officials and employees, including candidates for public
office, regarding the ethics code.
1 53
Commentary.
Many states have conflict of interest and financial disclosure laws which include local officials as
well as state officials. Cities in these states may wish to modify this section accordingly by either
eliminating duplication with state law or providing for local filing of state forms to provide local
access to the information.
Instead of providing essentially statutory language, this section mandates council passage of
certain basic subjects and which provide for a specific mechanism to
ordinances covering
administer and enforce the law. This permits amendment as may be required without a referendum,
which would be necessary if the charter covered the subject in detail. This provision shows that the
charter is serious about the need for dealing with ethics problems but at the same time leaves it to
the city council to adopt the formulation most appropriate for the specific situation. It makes a
provision for a Board of Ethics but leaves details on the board's composition and procedure to the
council.
Other provisions councils could adopt, but not listed in the Model, relate to acting in an official
or more to the official' s campaign; the
capacity over any campaign donor who contributes $
hiring of relatives; acting in an official capacity on matters affecting a prior employer within a
designated time period after leaving the employer; accepting outside employment while in office;
and accepting employment with an employer over whom the official or employee acted in an
official capacity, within a designated time period after leaving office. Westminster, Colorado,
pioneered the conflict of interest approach to limiting campaign contributions, via charter
amendment, and other cities have expressed interest in following its example either by charter or
and
ordinance. A substantial number of cities restrict hiring of relatives and prior, outside,
subsequent employment arrangements.
Section 7. 02. Prohibitions.
a) Activities Prohibited.
1) No person shall be appointed to or removed from, or in any way favored or
discriminated against with respect to any city position or appointive city
administrative office because of race, gender, age, sexual orientation,
disability, religion, country of origin, or political affiliation.
2) No person shall willfully make any false statement, certificate, mark, rating or
report in regard to any test, certification or appointment under the provisions
of this charter or the rules and regulations made there under, or in any
manner commit or attempt to commit any fraud preventing the impartial
execution of such provisions, rules and regulations.
3) No person who seeks appointment or promotion with respect to any city
position or appointive city administrative office shall directly or indirectly give,
render or pay any money, service or other valuable thing to any person for or
in connection with his or her test, appointment, proposed appointment,
promotion or proposed promotion.
54
4) No person
knowingly or willfully solicit or assist in soliciting any
shall
assessment,
subscription or contribution for any political party or political
purpose to be used in conjunction with any city election from any city officer
or city employee.
5) No city officer
