READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 09-16-08 workshop agenda — reading text
Part 28 of 50. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-16927-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
unanimous. The commentary on the 1964 provision stated: " Since
the initiative and referendum are more valuable in their availability than in their use, this Model
sets up an exacting procedure."
The 1989 and 2002 editions have a simple provision that takes note of the fact that in most states
where the initiative and referendum are available they are governed by the state election law.
The recall was eliminated in the 1941 edition and was considered and rejected for inclusion in
1964 and 1989 but has been restored in the eighth edition.
Ethics. Since its early editions, the Model has had provisions prohibiting municipal officers from
having conflicts of financial interest. The 1989 edition replaced statutory language in the charter
with a mandate for council passage of ordinances covering ethics issues and measures for their
enforcement. The eighth edition continues this approach and provides additional guidance for the
council.
Campaign Finance. The eighth edition adds campaign finance disclosure and limitation
provisions.
xi
Progress and Continuity
The continuity of the model -building process is well illustrated by Luther H. Gulick ( then
chairman of the Advisory Committee on the Revision of the Model City Charter and
subsequently chairman of the Institute of Public Administration), in the statement which
introduced the 1964 edition:
The American people have worked long and hard to achieve good city
government.
When the first edition of this Model City Charter was presented by
the National Municipal League in 1900, the chairman of the drafting committee
observed, " It has been confidently claimed by many that the most conspicuous
failure of democracy ... is demonstrated by the American city...."
No one could make that statement today because it is no longer true. We now
have many conspicuously successful local governments.... [ A] new or modernized
city charter ...not only presents a concise and workable legal framework for the
government but also sets before citizens a clear picture of their own
responsibilities and powers and before the officials and employees a statement of
their duties and mutual interrelations. Thus the adoption of a good city charter is
both an affirmation by the citizens that they mean to have good government and is
the legal framework within which such government can be won and the more
easily maintained.
The objective of the Model City Charter is to present in the form of a legal
document a general plan of municipal government which is ( a) democratic -- that
is to say responsive to the electorate and the community -- and at the same time
b) capable of doing the work of the city effectively and translating the voters'
intentions into efficient administrative action as promptly and economically as
possible.
Accordingly, the Model embodies the provisions and tested legal language, which
in theory and practice have helped to realize this double objective -- democracy
and effective management. And, following the precedent established by the
founding fathers when they wrote the Constitution of the United States, it does
this with the fewest possible words....
This charter is based on the principles of the council -manager plan because the
National Municipal League has found during many years of experience that this
arrangement of powers, responsibilities and duties best fits the good government
needs of the American city.... There are cities, especially in the largest population
class,
where the strong mayor plan is preferred. Provisions of this Model are
appropriate for such a charter, or may be readily adapted....
The machinery of government, designed by constitutions and charters, is not an
end in itself. It is rather an agreed -upon framework through which [ citizens] work
xii
together to govern and to service themselves. The importance of the machinery is
that these institutions when properly designed facilitate self -government and
encourage effective management....
Participation by citizens will take many forms -- as voters, as members of local
political or civic organizations, as elected officials, as appointed officials and
employees, and as members of official and unofficial advisory bodies. The Model
endeavors to present a fabric within which each type of participation and
leadership can have its appropriate place. As [ the Model] is used to aid charter
drafting, each city should think in terms of how its particular resources of
participating civic manpower will operate to make a new charter a vital going
enterprise. There will be wide variation from city to city.
Leadership. Those engaged in charter preparation will be particularly concerned
with a search for leadership to achieve municipal progress. Local government
problems today more than ever challenge imagination and courage. The task is
more than one simply of reflecting popular sentiment and administering the
resulting programs. Increasingly, the task must begin with an aggressive
campaign to inform and educate the electorate on new programs. The Model
presents no absolute prescription for the organization conducive to the
development of necessary leadership. Nor can this be done from afar by anyone
for a specific community.
Another problem of overriding importance is how the city fits into the general
framework of government. Few if any functions of government today are the
absolute preserve of a city. Aspects of virtually all functions are distributed
among all levels of government and frequently among several local units. The
Model recognizes this fact of urban life. Again, it offers no formula, but suggests
that charter commissions must look beyond the legal and geographical jurisdiction
of the municipality. The effectiveness of local political leadership may well be
judged ultimately by its capacity to mesh municipal programs with those of other
jurisdictions.
Responsibility. Finally, this Model ...asserts that the ultimate responsibility for all
basic policy decisions should be assigned to a single responsible legislative body,
the city council. It also insists that within the executive structure all officials be
appointed by and under the direction of the chief executive ...It endorses the use of
advisory bodies, with no operating powers but with significant duties, which can
utilize the talents of citizens to assess the implications of future programs.
This ...edition endeavors to refine and update the conception of municipal
government and its component parts presented in earlier editions. It reaffirms the
position that a municipality should have discretion to design the form and
structure of its own local government directly or through a " home rule" charter. It
sounds a warning, however, and emphasizes that home rule today does not mean
xiii
i
isolation from neighboring local governments. The goal of efficient, economic
and progressive municipal government is meaningful only when viewed as part
of the local, state and federal partnership.
Terrell Blodgett
William N. Cassella, Jr.
Terrell Blodgett is the former Mike Hogg Professor of Urban Management, Lyndon B. Johnson
School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin. He was chairman of the Model City Charter
Revision Committee that developed the seventh edition and was the former chairman of the
National Civic League.
William N. Cassella, Jr., was coordinator for the Model City Charter Revision Committee that
developed the seventh edition, and he is the retired executive director of the National Civic
League.
Blodgett and Cassella were senior advisors to the committee that developed the eighth edition of
the Model City Charter.
xiv
PREAMBLE TO THE CHARTER
Introduction.
A preamble typically consists of three elements: an identification of the source of authority
for the charter, a statement of the action that is to be taken, and a declaration of the intent of the
charter. The source of authority for a city charter is the state constitution or statutory law. The
action that is to be taken is the adoption of the charter. The declaration of the intent of the charter
comprises subjective statements ( not enforceable by law) that underscore or illuminate the
characteristics of a municipality, such as the values of the city, lofty goals, or even the " personality"
of the drafting commission. Charters within the same state often use the same language in their
preambles; the type of language used and the manner in which issues are addressed often provide a
glimpse of regional characteristics.
PREAMBLE
We the people of the [ city /town] of , under the constitution and laws of the
state of , in order to secure the benefits of local self -government and to provide
for an honest and accountable council- manager government do hereby adopt this charter
and confer upon the city the following powers, subject to the following restrictions, and
prescribed by the following procedures and governmental structure. By this action, we
secure the benefits of home rule and affirm the values of representative democracy,
professional management, strong political leadership, citizen participation, and regional
cooperation.
Commentary.
Source of Authority
Identification of the source of authority tends to be standard: " We the people of Your City, under
the constitution and laws of the state...."
Occasionally, however, the source of authority is embellished with descriptive elements that reflect
valued characteristics of the community. Two examples follow.
We the people of Your City, with our geographical and cultural diversity...."
Treasuring the many wonders of our unique environment and realizing that the power
and duty to govern and protect this region is inherent in its people, we the citizens of
Your City...."
Action Taken
The standard phrasing for the action statement is " do hereby adopt" or some variation. Following
are two examples of action taken by the source of authority.
do hereby adopt this charter."
do hereby adopt this home rule charter."
d
i
Intent
The standard
This can be the most creative section of the preamble ( and of the charter itself).
An expression of objectives, goals,
beginning of the intent section is: " By this action, we ..."
purposes, and/or values typically follows. The intent section can contain merely a reference to home .
rule or self
