READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 05-09-06 (regular) — reading text
Part 11 of 12. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-10166-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
De,cJ(5-tJ - Sv..dt fYltLrJ ~ -(I x IV c.
FIXED CONTRACT JOB# 510
03/ 21/2006
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT between City of Fort Walton Beach ( Herein referred to as " Owner"), and Decks N
Such Marine. Inc., ( herein referred to as " Contractor"):
WHEREAS, Owner is desirous that the Contractor Install a 5ft x 536ft seawall. At Sound Rotary
Park, Miracle Strip Pkwy., Fort Walton Baech, FL. 32578 ( Herein Referred to as the " Owners
Property ").
SECTION ONE
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Contractor will furnish all labor, equipment, and material to construct and complete in a
good, workmanlike, and substantial manner the following work: Install the first Sft x
150ft Shore Guard 225 Vinyl seawall in front of the existing seawall. The next 386ft will
be installed upland of the existing wall. The sheets will be 10ft long, and are 5 ft exposed
and 5ft unexposed. The wales are double 2x6 treated front, and single 2x6 treated
landward. The tie backs are ~" x 12' stainless steel, fastened to 5" x 7" dead man piles.
The cap is 2x12 treated wood cap. All fasteners are Stainless Steel.
The Rip-Rap is Class 1 Limestone, and is an estimated quantity for a 3ft x 6ft slope from
the wall. The Rip- Rap will be installed on the first 150ft of seawall only. The backfill is
an estimated quanity that will fill from the top of the wall back upland 15ft.
This bid is based on drawings by Connelly & wicker Inc.
SECTION TWO
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Contractor shall construct and owner shall pay total cost of construction of 5ft x 536ft seawall
Sign to accept each item desired; 7O"ftA.-/
Shore Guard 225 vinyl wall sheets 16, 785. 73)
xl p(3) 1. 3Z. 95
Seawall ( excluding vinyl wall sheets)
150ft of Class - 1 Limestone Existing wall (100CY)
46, 347. 22)
13, 881.71)
J= X
X
Backfill Labor 10, 500. 00) X
Payments will be made as follows:
1. Permit Application fees to DEP/ACOE and architect' s DEP/ACOE permit prep fee
if applicable, see pennit schedule following)
2. Mobilization and material draw 50% of total contract.
Local building permit ( see permit schedule following)
Destin Harbor (NPEB) licable, see permit schedule following)
fee (if aP1?
3. Progress payment [ See Draw Schedule]
initial
Decks N Such Marine, Inc. P. O. Box 327 Ft. Walton Bch., FL 32549 Office: 850- 314- 0444 Fax: 850- 314- 0445
FIDS " LLC"
850- 543- 4439
PROPOSALS FOR SOUNDSIDE PARK
FORT WALTON BEACH
FLORIDA
The
following is considered to be a work order when signed by the
customer and a representative of this company. The work order is to
include all equipment, labor and materials for said job.
Proposal 1: For the construction of 536 feet of 225 series vinyl
seawall wi th 5 foot of exposure to include tiebacks and anchors the
total cost will be $ 70, 000. 00. This price does not include additional
backfill, as this will not be required. If unforeseen problems occur
that require additional equipment, materials, and labor an addendum to
this contract will be initiated.
Proposal 2: For the placement of 150 feet ( 100cy) of Class I
limestone the total cost will be $ 16, 000. 00. This price will include
any and all materials, equipment, and labor required to complete the
tasking. If additional equipment is required for this task due to
unforeseen factors, an addendum to work will be initiated.
COMPLETION OF WORK WILL BE WITHIN A TIMELY MANNER AFTER COMMENCEMENT.
A SPECIFIC TIME FRAME CANNOT BE GIVEN AS UNFORSEEN FACTORS MAY AFFECT
COMPLETION ON A SCHEDULE. DAMAGE TO THE WORK IN PROGRESS. FROM ANY
FACTOR THAT REQUIRES REPLACEMENT OR REWORK WILL BE AT THE COST OF THE
CUSTOMER.
PAYMENT SCHEDULE WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: ~ OF ANY CONTRACT AMOUNT AFTER
SOME MATERIALS AND WORK HAS BEEN IN PROGRESS FOR 1 WEEK. THE REMAINDER
WILL BE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF EACH ACCEPTED PROPOSAL.
Thank. you,
vIr
Shawn M. Fidler
850) 543- 4439
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 9, 2006
Consent Agenda
Consideration of a request to authorize the repayment
of $ 12, 496. 38 in disallowed COPS grant expenses
City Manager)
Council Action
1st
2nd
Vote:
Agenda Item Number: CA- 6
C,
ITY OF FOR.T WALTON 'B6AC, t-
t
Memorandum
TO: Joyce Shanahan, City Manager
THROUGH: Ted Litschauer, Police Chief
FROM: Charlotte Dunworth, Financial Analyst
RE: COPS Audit
DATE: May 4, 2006
Backaround
The City was awarded three Community Oriented Policing ( COPS) grants in the 1990s - one COPS Fast grant
1995) and two COPS Universal Hiring Program grants ( 1996 & 1997). The purpose of both grant programs
was to provide three- year funding for salaries and benefits of officers engaged in community policing. Two
additional officers were hired under each grant.
Discussion
The US Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, conducted a site visit in 1999 to review the
three grants awarded to the City. An audit report was issued in June 2000. The audit identified seven
recommendations that required action prior to the audit being closed. To date, six of the seven
recommendations have been resolved. The outstanding recommendation involves questioned grant costs.
The audit report states " grantees are only eligible for reimbursement for costs approved in a financial
clearance memorandum." The grant manuals received by the City did not mention that the maximum local
match percentage was determined by the Financial Clearance Memorandum ( FCM). In fact, no reference at
all was made to the FCM in either grant manual. The audit report was the first time the City was notified of
non-compliance with the local match percentages. In addition to noting non- compliance with the overall local
match percentage for all three grant, the audit report states the City is in non- compliance with annual match
percentages for the Universal grants. The FCM' s for the Universal grants list the total federal and applicant
share per officer, but do not indicate that the federal and applicant share vary per year. Neither the grant
manuals nor FCM' s provide any indication that there is a specific annual local match requirement.
Quarterly Financial Status Reports were submitted based on the conditions of a minimum 25% local match
over the life of thegrant and decreasing the federal share annually, as stated in the grant manuals. During the
grant period, the City was never notified of non- compliance based on the information provided on the quarterly
financial reports. The City complied with the guidelines of both the Fast and Universal programs as set forth in
the grant manuals by providing a local match of no less than 25% for each grant and increasing the local
match percent each year.
The audit report indicates total questioned costs of $ 32, 972, comprised of the following amounts: $ 12,403
Fast; $ 14, 897 Universal 1; and $ 5, 672 Universal 2. These amounts were deemed unallowable because the
local match percentageon the FCM was not met for any of the grants and the salaries and benefits claimed
under the Universal grants were higher than allowed on the FCM.
The City strongly believes it complied with the guidelines of all three grants based on the information available
during the grant periods. A local match of no less than 25% was provided for each grant and the local match
percent increased each year. Despite inconsistencies in COPS grant documentation and a good faith effort to
comply with staff believes the best way to resolve the final outstanding audit issue is to
grant guidelines,
reimburse the US Department of Justice $ 12,496. 38 calculated as follows:
32, 972.00 Unallowable questioned costs
8. 072. 62> Previous over-deobligation
24, 899. 38
12.403. 00> Fast grant questioned costs eliminated after closure of recommendation 1
12,496. 38 City reimbursement to US Department of Justice
Mr. Frank Mathers, Management Analyst in the COPS Office Audit Division, has advised staff that the Office of
the Inspector General has agreed to close out the audit once repayment in the amount of $ 12, 496. 38 is
received. Staff does not believe appealing this decision is a viable option.
Recommendation
Staff recommends repayment of $ 12, 496. 38 in disallowed grant expenses. If approved, sufficient funding is
available in the Law Enforcement Trust Fund. A budget amendment will be necessary to report this expense.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ted Utschauer
kwii/L
Charlotte Dunworth
Police Chief Financial Analyst
oncur
Do no concur
Hold for discussion
u:\ cdunworth\ granlsf\ y 2006\ cops audil- council mlg 5-9. doc
Charlotte Dunworth
From: Frank. Mathers@usdoj. gov
ent: Monday, April 24, 200612: 20 PM
To: Charlotte Dunworth
Subject: Closure of the last OIG audit recommendation for the OIG Audit GR- 40- 00- 011
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential
Charlotte,
I just received word from the OIG that recommendations 1 and 5 are now closed.
Originally there were seven
recommendations. Six have been closed. Recommendation 2 " Remedy the
questioned costs of $32, 972 for unallowable
reimbursement" ~ remains open. In my letter to OIG on March 16, 2006, I put forth the
