READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — February 4, 2014 — Minutes — reading text
Part 4 of 5. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 53-December 17 2013 Regular Meeting Minutes.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
requirement. Mr. Amunds commented
that he supports changing the insurance requirement in the
proposed ordinance to $300,000. Mr. Harman stated the intent is
not to create an economic hardship but to indemnify you (BCC).
He also advised that he does not support the concept of issuing
a RFP for a single cab company, emphasizing they do not
discriminate.
Mr. Parisot stated he has a number of comments. Regarding
insurance, he said he agrees with $300,000 in coverage. He said
he has questions about the tenure of vehicles and has no problem
December 17, 2013 -16- Minute Book 70, Page 183
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
as long as the vehicle meets safety conditions and passes a
safety inspection. Mr. Parisot said he has concerns about the
policy on dress and the fact that it is the director who
determines what is offensive. He continued but stated his
bottom line tonight is to table this hearing until the next
South County meeting (January 21, 2014) and feels Mr. Harman
should meet with the taxicab drivers.
Mr. Boyles said from his perspective he does not think the
policy should be by ordinance. He also believes when the
product comes to the Board, it should be ready to go. Mr.
Boyles stressed we are considering adoption of a law and it
should not contain typos. He pointed out some of the
typographical errors in the proposed ordinance.
Mr. Harris stated he agrees with Mr. Boyles and feels it could
be Airport regulations rather than an ordinance. He said he
also agrees with Mr. Parisot’s point about staff sitting down to
discuss these issues with the taxi drivers. Mr. Harris stated
he wants legal to convince him it must be an ordinance. He did
not support a RFP for a single provider. To the gentleman that
spoke about not moving far in the queue line and not be allowed
to take a nap in his vehicle, Mr. Harris said the decision to be
a cab driver is a choice. He stated first impressions are
important and he supports a standard of dress and has concerns
about old, beat-up vehicles.
Mr. Parisot stated the proposed ordinance has no appeals process
for anyone who disagrees with the Airports Director's position
on dress and offensive clothing. He said there should be some
type of appeals process, such as going to the County
Administrator or to the Board.
Mr, Parisot made motion, seconded by Mr. Harris, to table this
hearing until January 21, 2014 at 6:30 p.m.; to arrange a
meeting with the cab drivers; and to clean up the typographical
errors on the proposed ordinance. 4 yeas, 1 nay. (Mr. Windes
voted no.)
RECESS - The meeting was recessed at 8:10 p.m. and reconvened at
8:27 p.m.
December 17, 2013 -17- Minute Book 70, Page 184
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
WATER & SEWER SYSTEM —- CONTRACT MODIFICATION WITH EGLIN AIR
FORCE BASE, DELIVERY DATE EXTENSIONS
Mr. Jeff Littrell, Water & Sewer System Director, requested
approval of the fifth contract modification with Eglin Air Force
Base (EAFB) for delivery date extensions related to construction
work and the Capacity Expansion Charges for EAFB wastewater at
Main Base and Camp Rudder. He noted that EAFB requested a
change in the alignment and wanted additional environmental work
done. This modification will add eight months due to government
delays. Mr. Boyles made motion, seconded by Mr. Parisot, to
approve this contract modification. 5 yeas.
PUBLIC WORKS - 2013-14 PROJECTS CARRY FORWARD REQUEST
Mr. John Hofstad, Public Works Director, stated some projects
were delayed due to weather, materials complications and
contractor delays. He requested the following projects be
carried forward from the 2012-13 Road and Bridge Capital Project
budget to the 2013-14 budget: Foxwood Phase 2, Gilmore Road,
Robinson Road, Lighthouse Church Road, Kervin Road, and the
remainder of the Cold Mix Preservation funds. Mr. Harris made
motion, seconded by Mr. Parisot, to approve the department
head’s request. 5 yeas.
AIRPORTS - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AIRPORT REVENUE REFUNDING BOND
The Board is requested to approve a resolution which will amend
and restate Resolution No. 13-164 (adopted on November 5, 2013).
This amending resolution will authorize refinancing of the
county’s Series 2003 Airport Revenue Bonds and repay $1.2
Million of the existing $2 Million loan with the Florida Local
Government Finance Commission through a negotiated sale with
Compass Mortgage Corporation (Compass).
Mr. Sunil Harman, Airports Director, stated bond counsel Mark
Mustian and financial consultant Bill Case are present to answer
any questions regarding the resolution before the Board for
consideration. He advised that 19 banks were solicited for a
direct loan for refinancing. Three proposals were received and
a fair and impartial analysis was performed. Two of the
proposals were deemed non-responsive by not meeting the criteria
in the RFP’s term sheet. The third proposal was from BBVA
Compass and met all criteria. The county and its financial
advisor evaluated the proposal and determined this option would
result in savings of $1.7 Million over the term of the loan.
December 17, 2013 -18- Minute Book 70, Page 185
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Mr. Harman advised the closing on the bank loan with Compass is
set for January 15, 2014. Upon inquiry by Mr. Parisot, Mr.
Harman stated the commissioners and the Clerk were provided with
updated documents. Mr. Parisot made motion, seconded by Mr.
Windes, to adopt the resolution amending and restating in its
entirety a resolution of the Board to provide for and to
authorize the issuance of Airport Revenue Refunding Bond, Series
2014 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10 Million
for the purpose of refunding the county’s Airport Revenue Bonds,
Series 2003. 5 yeas.
RESOLUTION NO. 13-227
ATRPORTS -—- NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL ATRPORT BRANDING RESEARCH
Mr. Harman stated this is an informational item and requested
the Board accept the information and interim report update on
research efforts conducted through Market Dynamics Research
Group (MDRG) for the market positioning and naming (branding) of
the Northwest Florida Regional Airport (VPS). He said the
Airport is floating with an identity crisis because of the
difficulty in determining what cities it serves. Mr. Harman
stated Northwest Florida is a vast region, stretching from
Tallahassee to Pensacola. He advised that if the research shows
there is a better way to brand, MDRG will make a presentation to
the Board.
Mr. Harris pointed out that coming back from a recent trip, the
Northwest Florida Regional Airport was always identified as Fort
Walton Beach. He added he doesn’t know why he voted to approve
that name because it does not identify Okaloosa County.
Mr. Windes made motion to approve.
Mr. Parisot interjected a history of the renaming. He said the
proposal was brought forward by former Airports Director Greg
Donovan. Mr. Parisot wanted all the information previously
provided by Mr. Donovan sent to the commissioners before signing
a contract for $35,000 for the research. He remarked the first
he heard about this proposal was in the newspaper. Mr. Parisot
felt that if an item requires Board approval to implement, it
should come before the Board or someone should “walk the hails.”
Mr. Amunds stated for clarification that an amount over $25,000
(but less than $50,000) can be approved by the County
Administrator. Mr. Padgett confirmed that to be true.
December 17, 2013 -19- Minute Book 70, Page 186
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Mr. Harris stated he will second Mr. Windes’ motion. Mr. Boyles
asked for clarification on what the Board is voting on. Mr.
Amunds said it is to accept the information and interim report.
A brief discussion ensued with Mr. Harris noting the
commissioners are not meant to be micromanagers. He added that
he does not know how to run an airport.
Mr. Boyles reiterated the motion is to accept the report, not to
approve any changes. He said if there is a problem with the
Purchasing Manual policies, then address the Purchasing Manual.
Mr. Boyles asked if there is an issue with staff making
decisions, saying that is the purview the Board grants them. He
stated if Mr. Parisot has a bone to pick, then he should pick it
with the County Administrator. 4 yeas, 1 nay. (Mr. Parisot
voted no.)
Upon inquiry by Mr. Boyles, Mr. Harman stated if anything
develops beyond the research, a more thorough report will be
made to the Board.
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE - SHALIMAR ANNEX PROJECT UPDATE
Mr. Don Turner, Facilities Maintenance Director, stated the
design team has put together simple concept sketches of possible
options for the new building to be constructed at the Shalimar
Annex site. He advised they will return at a later date with
elevation options.
Mr. Amunds said he spoke with Mr. Turner and Mr. Padgett and
these concepts are conceptual only and no determination is being
made on square footage or where certain offices will be located.
He emphasized they are not looking at small details but an
overview.
Mr. Pat Balish, Dag Architects, displayed and explained the
following concept drawings:
e Site plan with building running east-west, using existing
driveways and grade
e Three-story concept; first floor plan; 37,741 square feet
total with 938 square feet for future development
e Three-story concept; second floor plan; 14,960 square feet
total with 212 square feet for future development
e Three-story concept; third floor plan; 14,960 square feet
total with 1,782 square feet for future development
December 17, 2013 -20- Minute Book 70, Page 187
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
¢ Two-story Option “A”; first floor concept; 37,741 square
feet total with 938 square feet for future development
e Two-story Option “A”; second floor concept; 33,736 square
feet total with 5,706 square feet for future development
e Two-story Option “B”; first floor concept; 33,912 square
feet total with 938 square feet for future development
e Two-story Option “B”; second floor concept; 30,551 square
feet total with 590 square feet for future development
e three-story option - massing study
e Two-story Option “A” - massing study
e Two-story Option “B” - massing study
Discussion ensued. Mr. Padgett emphasized these are early
concept drawings and that no final decisions have been made on
who will be located in the building. He said this is a rough
start and there is still much work to be done.
Mr. Steve Christopher with Lord & Son stated it is premature to
speculate on the expense of the building at this time. He said
they will look at the committee to hone down the concepts.
The discussion continued. Mr. Parisot questioned the need for a
large meeting room. Mr. Amunds stated he does not want to
continue to rent space from OCWS to hold meetings. Mr. Boyles
asked if the spaces the county leases in the Water & Sewer
Administration Building are vacated will they be leased to the
private sector. He asked if the Board could buy the Water &
Sewer Administration Building. Mr. Boyles said he does not want
to slow down the process and also felt someone on staff should
be assigned exit strategies. Mr. Parisot stated they should
“relook” the whole thing, asking how big a building is needed.
Mr. Windes stated in his mind we are building a governmental
center and that is what it should be used for. He added that he
is not opposed to considering Mr. Boyles’ proposal on the Water
and Sewer building. Mr. Windes said he is not a big fan of the
three-story building but prefers a two-story one and we should
build what we need, not what we want. He reiterated he wants
something more traditional and wants it to look like a
government building.
Mr. Amunds noted he would like a small group involved in this
project. Mr. Padgett repeated we are just starting and some
basic decisions are to be made. He recommended the appointment
of a task force/working group with a commissioner on the group.
Mr.
