READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 03-11-08 Special agenda (finance director) — reading text
Part 6 of 7. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-14132-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Please distribute to council asap.
Thankyou,
3/ 11/ 2008
Page 2 of 2
Dennis Reeves
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepa e.
3/ 11/ 2008
0
DRAFT
Alachua, Florida
EMPLOYEE NAME: Lisa Absher ,_ EMPLOYEE #: 1241 HmE DATE: f 1/ 08/2002
PosrnoN Trri.E: Asst. City Manager DEPARTMENT: Executive PAY RANGE: $ 61K - $76K
EVALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE FOR PMOD: 11/ 08/2002 to 04/0212003 Date of Appraisal: 04/02/2003.
REASON FOR APPRAISAL: Annual Probationary . Special
The Performance Appraisal should reflect a sound and impartial judgment of the employee' s performance on
currently assigned responsibilities.
The Performance Appraisal is to be completed by the employee' s immediate supervisor, the Rater, and reviewed
by the Rater' s supervisor, the Reviewer. If a Reviewer disagrees with a Rater' s rating of any particular item, the
Reviewer may so comment on the evaluation, but may not change the rating.
The Rater shall discuss each performance appraisal with the employee being evaluated. The Department Head
shall furnish the employee an official copy of the employee' s Performance Appraisal. The employee may record
any comments he/she may have, including statements of disagreement with the appraisal. A permanent employee
shall also be given the opportunity to appeal the rating in the manner set forth by the City Manager.
The following factors should be marked with a check mark indicating the performance of the employee.
Scale: 1 - 2 = Above Average 3 = Average 4 -5 = Below Average
1 2 3 4 5
KNOWLEDGE OF JOB - A clear understanding of the facts or factors pertinent to
the job.
SWLU - Technical proficiency required to perform job function, i.e.; typing,
computer software, machine operation, analytical and managerial skills.
DEPENDABILITY - Conscientious, thorough, accurate, reliable.
V JUDGMENT - Ability to arrive at sound egnclusions and make intelligent decisions.
Z" iNITIAUW - Earnestness in seeking increased responsibility. Self starting,
-
unafraid to proceed alone.
d COOPERATION - Willingness
subordinates toward common team goals.
to work with associates, supervisors, and
2"' QUALM OF WORK - Thoroughness, neatness, and accuracy of work.
F- 1 WPUNCTUALrrY - Reports to work on time.
Performance Appraisal
Last Updated 03/ 25/ 2003
D D [ j F] D ATTENDANCE - Faithful in coming to work daily. DRAFT
D D E? 0 ATTITUDE - Positive approach towards co- workers, supervisors, and customers.
Positive response to constructive comments, by supervisors.
D D D D TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION - Listens well and responds professionally to
customer complaints and inquiries; good telephone manners; takes and transmits
accurate messages.
D D D CUSTOMER SERVICE -- Taking responsibility for solving customer problems.
10 BE COMPLETED ON MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL ^-
D D D LEADERSHIP -- Ability to direct the activities and guide the performance of
employees.
F- 1 [ Z( D EFFECTIVENESS - Ability to obtain desired results from employees.
D F-1 IJ D COMMUNICATION SKILLS - Ability to give written or verbal messages that are
understandable.
OVERALL BATING—
ABOVE AVERAGE D AVERAGE BELOW AVERAGE
FOR ANY RATING OTHER THAN AVERAGE, PLEASE COMMENT BELOW:
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED.
EMPLO'YEE' S Commu s:
Rater' s Signature Date
Reviewer' s Signature Date
THIS EVALUATION HAs BEEN DISCUSSED WITH ME; SIGNING BELOW micATEs THAT I HAVE Rwmm THIS
APPRAISAL, NOT THAT I AGREE WITH ITS CONTENTS.
Employee' s Signature Date
City Manager's Signature Date
DATA ENTRY BY: DATE ENTE m: % INCREASE: CURRENT RATE: $ NLw RATE: $
Performance Appraisal
Last Updated 03125/2003
t
jJ :. S
Absher, Lisa #1241
Performance Appraisal
DRAFT 04- 02- 2003
KNOWLEDGE OF JOB 1 SKILLS: Above Average
As I have stated on numerous occasions, Ms. Absher is sharp and knowledgeable in municipal
government,
which was my primary reason for hiring her as Assistant City Manager -• I
recognized her abilities and thought that she would be a valuable asset to the operations of our
City. She is very computer literate and proficient in her skills to complete the duties required of
her.
DEPENDABILITY: Below Average
On numerous occasions, issues have been brought to my attention by which I had no knowledge
of — those that Ms. Absher had been tasked to complete. I constantly have to inquire as to the
current status of projects Ms. Absher is working on, as she does not follow through on certain
tasks, nor does she keep me informed as to what she is doing. Further, during her absence, I
attempted to contact Ms. Absher on three separate occasions, and never received a can back.
Ms. Absher was provided a cell phone by the city, but has chosen not to utilize it.
INITIATIVE: Above Average
Ms. Absher has no problem with proceeding on tasks independently. She has been tasked with a
great deal of assignmerrts, a number of which are self initiated.
-
COOPERATION: Below Average
Ms. Absher is extremely difficult to work with. Discussions with her are commonly one sided,
and she is not receptive to the views of others. Members of staff have noticed this problem, as I
have also been informed of like behavior with other department heads. Ms. Absher has a
tendency to speak towards others in an extremely condescending tone, and is resistant to offer
assistance to co- workers.
PUNCTUALITY: Below Average
Punctuality has always been a problem with Ms. Absher. . I have be= ext wvly. lenient in
regards
to this issue, as when she first began working for the city she was commuting from out of
town. Ms. Absher assured me that once she moved locally this would no longer be a problem;
however, this continues to persist. She and I have discussed this issue at length on several
occasions, and I have advised her in writing of this problem on two separate occasions —both of
which Ms. Absher assured me she would rectify this problem, and implored that I not proceed
with the written notification. I tried to explain to her that I cannot hold other employees
accountable for reporting to work on time, and allow a special exception for her, as this problem
has not gone unnoticed by other members of staff. In an effort to give her the benefit of doubt,
she was not issued the written correspondences; however, Ms. Absher has yet to report to work
by 8: 00 a.m. since she has been employed with the City, which is why this is now included in her
performance appraisal.
More specifically, during a recent conversation she and I had regarding
this issue, Ms. Absher said that she could not work for me if I expected her to come in at 8 :00
DRAF1
Absher, Lisa 01241
Performance Appraisal
t'
04 -02 -2003
a.m. every day and work late. She closed the discussion by saying; " This is not going to work
just fire me so I can get my severance."
out...
Annum Below Average
Ms. Absher continuously displays a. great deal of resistance in response to any form of
constructive criticism from others or myself. Her actions have alienated staff to the point that
co- workers from other departments no longer feel comfortable coming to City Mall, solely
because they do not want to be confronted by Ms. Absher. There have been numerous instances
where Ms. Absher has been defiant to directives I have issued her, and displays blatant disrespect
towards me in front of other stafE She has even gone so far as to use profanity towards me. In
particular, Ms. Absher and I were recently discussing the ma= er in which grant activities would
be handled. Ms. Absher and I discussed having a primary central contact for all city grants, with
which I concurred; although, I also wanted for all correspondence to be copied to Laura
Dedenbach and myself. As the Planning & Commu ty Development Director, Ms.
Dedenbach' s department has direct involvement with all grants of the city, thus the need for her
to receive such information -- while I, as City Manager, simply wanted to remain informed as to
the status of all grants. Ms. Absher vehemently argued that it was not necessary to duplicate this
information, and out -and -out said, " No, that is duplication that Laura does not need." I had to
close the conversation by stating to Ms. Absher that this was the way I would like for it to be
done, and for her to please proceed to notify Summit Professional Services, Inc. as I had advised.
The following day I received the letter Ms. Absher prepared for Summit, and although she stated
w the letter that I was to be copied on all correspondence, she still did not include Ms.
Dedenbach as directed to do so.
LEADERSHIP / EFFELTmwss: Below Average
As mentioned above, Ms. Absher' s deficiency in cooperating with co-workers and subordinates
directly affects her leadership abilities and effectiveness. Her demeanor is extremely abrupt
when dealing with staff as well as myself, and her unwillingness to be receptive to the views of
others leaves no room for discussion when she issues directives. I have also found that Ms.
Absher has a tendency to take over when a task she has delegated to another employee
