READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — May 6, 2014 — Action Item Printout — reading text
Part 1 of 1. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 07-Action Item Printout.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: May 6, 2014
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Elliot Kampert
SUBJECT: LPA 01-14 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
DEPARTMENT: Growth Management
BCC DISTRICT: 1
PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a request changing the use of land submitted by Westerra
Development, Inc. as agent for Nola D. Thomas and Myra Evans relating to property located off
Lake Silver Road, Crestview. The request is to change the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Map (FLUM) designation for the property from Rural Residential (RR) to Low Density
Residential (LDR), or a more restrictive FLUM designation. TRANSMITTAL HEARING FOR
STATE AGENCY REVIEW.
STAFF FINDINGS:
• The proposed FLUM amendment is classified as a Type - 1 plan amendment which involves
properties 10 acres or more in size. Type - 1 amendments must be transmitted to the State for
state agency review.
• The current RR FLUM category permits single-family dwellings and related uses at an allowable
density of two (2) units to the acre. This density would allow up to 224 single-family dwellings
on the amendment site.
• The proposed LDR FLUM category permits single-family dwellings and related uses at an
allowable density of four (4) units to the acre. This density would allow up to 448 single-family
dwelling units on the amendment site.
• Evaluation guidelines and criteria for Type - 1 amendments are specified in the Comprehensive
Plan, Administration Element, Policy 1.15. Staff evaluation of these is attached as Exhibit 1. The
proposed amendment was found to be consistent with the specified guidelines and criteria.
• Properties adjacent and proximate to the amendment site are shown on the FLUM as RR to the
west and north, and LDR to the east and south.
• There are existing residential subdivisions in the immediate vicinity.
• Any adjacent farm operations must be buffered from a residential subdivision by a minimum 30
foot buffer as required by Future Land Use Element Policy 10.14A.
PUBLIC COMMENT/OPPOSITION: See attached letters.
PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval at
a public hearing held April 10, 2014.
MILITARY REPRESENTATIVE: No comment.
STAFF POSITION: Staff has no objection to the requested FLUM amendment and rezoning.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board consider the facts presented herein, as well
as any facts that may be presented at the public hearing, and then decide whether or not to approve the
FLUM amendment for state agency review.
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Ernie Padgett, County Administrator
