READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE

Okaloosa County BOCC — 2013 meeting #1123 (date undetermined) — Budget Policy Document FY14 — reading text

Part 18 of 19. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.

Machine-extracted text — 04-Budget Policy Document FY14.pdf

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed

Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.

eliminate or minimize the need for a reduction in workforce. With these programs, an eligible employee could voluntarily resign or retire from county employment and their position, or similar positions in the same funding source, was permanently eliminated. These programs allowed a one-time payment of six months salary or $25,000, whichever was greater, to eligible employees plus payment for one- half the employees’ health insurance premiums for 18 months. A total of 48 positions were deleted through these two programs resulting in an estimated savings of $2,923,304 in the third and subsequent years of the programs through the elimination of salaries and benefits for the 48 positions that were deleted. In July 2011, legislators amended Florida Statute 215.425, thereby affecting the County’s ability to offer the same type of VSIP to employees. The Statute amendments eliminated bonuses not specifically tied to performance and capped severance pay to an amount not greater than 20 weeks of compensation. In an effort to continue to shrink operations, a VSIP was developed and implemented in April 2012 that provided increased annual and sick leave payouts and payment for one-half the employees’ health insurance premiums for 18 months. A total of three positions were eliminated. Positions deleted through the Voluntary Separation Incentive Programs combined with layoffs and not filling positions vacated through attrition reduced Okaloosa County’s budgeted positions by 137 positions over the past six budget years. Offset by some added positions, the County experienced a net decrease of 89 positions during this period. Page 42 As the County looks for alternatives to layoffs during these tough economic times, there are other options to cut costs that could be considered. Some of those options explored in this report include work furloughs, reduced work-weeks and reduced salaries. However, unless carefully planned and regulated, they can expose the County to liability for wage and hour violations. Furloughs In the context of budget cuts, the “save money” furlough is a planned event by an agency which is designed to absorb reductions necessitated by downsizing, reduced funding or any other event which requires an agency to save money. Mandatory furloughs can be a viable alternative to layoffs if implemented correctly. However, a furlough must be carefully planned and implemented when it comes to exempt employees covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and other laws. Exempt employees under federal law and many state laws must be paid the same minimum salary for each pay period worked. According to the law, if an exempt employee performs any work during a workweek, that person must receive his or her entire salary for that week. Thus, failure to pay an exempt employee for a week where any work is performed — even very minimal work such as writing an email from home — can jeopardize that employee’s exempt status. However, in contrast, the Fair Labor Standards Act does include a special provision for employees of public agencies due to a budget-required furlough as long as the exempt employee is converted to an hourly status during the furloughed work week. This means the employee may not work additional hours during that week without being compensated at the overtime rate for those additional hours, the same as a non-exempt, or hourly, employee. Furloughs are easier to implement with non-exempt employees. Under federal and most state wage and hour laws, non-exempt employees must be paid only for actual hours worked. Consequently, an employer may send them home for lack of work or to otherwise save payroll costs, and need not pay them for their regularly scheduled hours if they have not actually worked. In an effort to keep the current Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners workforce employed, an analysis was done to determine the impact of furloughs on the budget and is reflected in the following chart. Page 43 All Employees (744) 1 - 8 hour 3 - 8 hour 5 - 8 hour 10 - 8 hour day days days days Governmental Fund (423) $76,056.53 $228,169.58 $380,282.63 $760,565.25 Enterprise Fund (218) $39,449.44 $118,348.32 $197,247.21 $394,494.41 Public Safety (103) $14,831.40 $44,494.20 $74,157.00 $148,314.01 Total $130,337.37 $391,012.10 $651,686.84 $1,303,373.68 *Savings on Total Payroll: Data Excludes County Commissioners and Part-time, Relief and Temporary Employees Additional Okaloosa County furlough scenarios are outlined on Attachment A. For example, if employees within the Governmental Fund, whose salaries are $60,000 or higher, were furloughed for five days, the savings to the County would be approximately $64,674. Over the past several years, many states, counties, cities and universities nationwide have either contemplated or implemented voluntary or involuntary employee furloughs in an effort to save money. This year, Congress failed to stop automatic budget cuts that were set to take effect March 1, 2013; therefore, the Department of Defense notified all civilian employees nationwide that they would begin observing 22 furlough days from April 2013 to September 2013. This 22 day furlough is estimated to save $4 billion to $5 billion towards a $46 billion deficit. Page 44 Reduced Work-Week & Decreased Salaries A reduced work week — for example, a four-day, 32 hour work week — can be even more difficult to implement than furloughs. For example, if an employer wants to implement a four day work week, with 20% pay cut, such a pay reduction could threaten the exempt status if the 20% pay cut brings the employee’s salary below the required threshold amount, which is $455 per week under federal law. In this example, one Okaloosa County employee in an exempt status would fall below the $455 per week threshold. An employer also may not deduct 20% of pay from an exempt employee’s paycheck during a current pay period based on a reduction in work time (unless under the furlough provision described earlier). It is generally accepted that the least risk is taken by reducing the pay of exempt employees without dictating the hours they work. SUMMARY We’ve all heard the phrase, “tough times call for tough decisions.” While many employers argue that it may be less harmful to cut all employees’ salaries rather than layoff a number of employees, this theory does not necessarily hold true in Okaloosa County. There are currently about 117 employees or 15.7% of the current workforce who are at, below, or within 20% of the federal poverty guideline of $23,050. In the Fort Walton Beach, Crestview and Destin market area, the HUD “very low income limit” for a family of four is $34,200. Using this localized data, there are currently about 506 employees or 68% of the current workforce who are at, below, or within 20% of the very low income limit. 1 In an organization where employees are paid a salary far above the poverty level, those employees may be able to weather a 10% or 20% reduction in their pay. However, many of our employees are not far from the poverty level and to reduce their pay from the County may force many into bankruptcy, poor health habits (eliminate health insurance/doctor/dental visits, healthy food choices), or other actions that will affect them for the rest of their lives. Many of our lower paid employees have been working 2nd and 3rd jobs in order to make ends meet while working for the County. Now many of those 2nd and 3rd jobs have gone away or have been reduced so that they are at a point where they are relying even more heavily on their County pay. To cut employees’ pay may push them into (or further into) debt and will increase their stress. While mandatory furloughs are certainly an option for reducing overall costs, their negative impact on the lives of valued employees must likewise be carefully considered. We understand that dramatic measures may need to be considered to meet the challenges that lie ahead. Unfortunately, it may be healthier for the entire organization to eliminate some programs or offices and layoff those employees who had been performing those functions. If this is your recommendation, we will assist those employees in finding other positions in the County, and if we are unsuccessful with that, we will work with them to obtain unemployment compensation benefits and continue their job search outside of county government. Finally, as we continue to face daunting budget challenges that impact the morale of the organization and services to the citizenry, it is suggested that as an organization we move beyond the traditional across the board budget cuts by thinking of alternatives as to how we approach this budget challenge. As we explore alternatives for the county it is time to make smart cuts by using a horizontal approach and looking at programs that cut 1 This is significant because a furlough of one 8-hour day in a week would equal a 20% pay cut for that week, placing the employee at or below the federal poverty or “very low income” level for that week. Page 45 across many agencies and services. During fiscally tight times the organization should consider eliminating redundant or duplication in programs, eliminating or restructuring ineffective programs where performance data does not support success, cut programs that are isolated and not part of an integrated service effort, and eliminate duplication of effort across agencies and departments. Regardless of the decisions made, your Human Resources Department stands ready to assist management and employees throughout the process. Page 46 Attachment A Workers' Total Salaries Multiplier Adjusted Salary Difference FICA Retirement Comp Total Savings 10 Day Furlough (2080 vs 2000 hrs) 0.038 Governmental Fund $16,606,923.57 0.962 $15,968,195.74 (638,727.83) (48,862.68) (49,237.45) (23,737.29) (760,565.25) Enterprise Fund $8,848,977.73 0.962 $8,508,632.43 (340,345.30) (26,036.42) (19,020.55) (9,092.16) (394,494.41) Public Safety - All $3,159,325.16 0.962 $3,037,812.65 (121,512.51) (9,295.71) (13,445.68) (4,060.11) (148,314.01) Total Salaries $28,615,226.45 0.962 $27,514,640.82 (1,100,585.63) (84,194.80) (81,703.68) (36,889.56) (1,303,373.68) 5 Day Furlough (2080 vs 2040 hrs) 0.019 Governmental Fund $16,606,923.57 0.981 $16,287,559.65 (319,363.91) (24,431.34) (24,618.72) (11,868.65) (380,282.63) Enterprise Fund $8,848,977.73 0.981 $8,678,805.08 (170,172.65) (13,018.21) (9,510.27) (4,546.08) (197,247.21) Public Safety - All $3,159,325.16 0.981 $3,098,568.91 (60,756.25) (4,647.85) (6,722.84) (2,030.06) (74,157.00) Total Salaries $28,615,226.45 0.981 $28,064,933.64 (550,292.82) (42,097.40) (40,851.84) (18,444.78) (651,686.84) 3 Day Furlough (2080 vs 2056 hrs) 0.012

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓