READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — July 2, 2013 — reading text
Part 29 of 33. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
airports to zoning regulations has been upheld in
numerous courts up to and including the U.S. Supreme Court.
It continues to be the County’s position that aircraft operations, including helicopter sightseeing
businesses, should be conducted from a duly licensed public or private airport. As such, the County has
recently amended its zoning regulations to that effect. However, the County’s zoning regulations and
zoning districts do not extend seaward from the shoreline into any water bodies. Even so, the County is
currently in the process of further amending the zoning regulations so as to prohibit aerial sightseeing
operations on water bodies as well.
County regulation of vessels is also primarily pre-empted to federal and state authorities. Vessel safety,
registration, navigation, inspections, etc. are regulated by the Coast Guard and the State of Florida.
County jurisdiction is generally limited to restricted areas (no wake, idle speed) and designated mooring
fields.
The significance of this is that the County is using the limited means at its disposal to control what is
considered to be an unsafe situation being caused by sightseeing helicopters. The Applicant is also
aware of the county’s limitations.
C. Public Interest
The County is keenly aware that the District Engineer’s decision to issue a permit is based on an
evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its
Packet Pg. 370
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
SAJ-2013-00022 (SP-EPS)
August 8, 2013
Page 3
intended use on the public interest, and that a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer
determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The comments offered herein are in no way
intended or should be construed as the County substituting its judgment for that of the District
Engineer, but rather to provide local insight that might not otherwise be available to the decision-
making process. In this regard, comments are presented within the context of the policy guidance and
general permit evaluation criteria expressed at 33 CFR 320.4 as follows.
(2) The following general criteria will be considered in the evaluation of every application:
(i) The relative extent of the public and private need for the proposed structure or work:
COMMENT: If approved, the floating platform will be the first of its kind to be introduced into local
waterways. The County’s concerns extend beyond the instant proposal to the precedent that will be set
for future situations. The types of activities that can occur on floating platforms outside the County’s
zoning jurisdiction are only limited by imagination. Thus, the County strongly encourages the District
Engineer to consider the cumulative impact of any number of business enterprises that might be
encouraged by approving the permit.
With regard to the instant proposal, the County has not been able to discern any identifiable public need
that will be met from the operation of a floating helicopter sightseeing business. As to determination of
a private need there are no quantifiable factors associated with the activity, such as certificates of need
for private hospitals and the like, from which to gauge whether there is a need for a floating helicopter
sightseeing business or not. Even if there is a need for a helicopter sightseeing business that type of
business can be conducted from locations other than a floating platform.
(ii) Where there are unresolved conflicts as to resource use, the practicability of using reasonable
alternative locations and methods to accomplish the objective of the proposed structure or work;
COMMENT: Conflicts involving water-resource use are readily apparent in the East Pass/Destin Harbor
area. It is common local knowledge that during the summer tourist season and in particular on
weekends and holidays the area in and around East Pass, Old Pass, and “Crab Island” is heavily used by
all manner of swimmers, divers, rental vessels, charter boats, recreational vessels, kayaks, canoes,
personal watercraft, rubber floats, parasails, flying boats, and some things that defy description (See
Exhibit 5). For the most part, these can be considered water-dependent or at least water-related to the
extent that being on the water is essential or important for these things to occur. This area is
considered locally to be the most congested water-use area of Okaloosa County. Given this, a “floating
platform to be used as a helipad” is clearly not either water-dependent or water-related and would not
represent reasonable use of an already congested area.
Packet Pg. 371
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
SAJ-2013-00022 (SP-EPS)
August 8, 2013
Page 4
As stated previously, the County’s position is that aircraft operations, including helicopter sightseeing
businesses, should be conducted from a duly licensed public or private airport. A reasonable alternative
to the proposed “floating platform for use as a helipad” would be the Destin Airport which is located
approximately 3 to 4 miles from the proposed platform locations. County research indicates it is
common practice across the country for aerial sightseeing businesses including airplanes, helicopters,
hot air balloons, and gliders to operate from licensed airports and airfields. The proposed floating
platform is, from the County perspective, the least desirable method of accomplishing the objective of
operating a helicopter sightseeing business given the already congested situation in that area.
(iii) The extent and permanence of the beneficial and/or detrimental effects which the proposed
structure or work is likely to have on the public and private uses to which the area is suited.
COMMENT: As described previously, the County is unable to identify any beneficial effect the proposal
would have on the public or private uses of the East Pass/Destin Harbor area. The area is best suited for
water-resource based uses, particularly water-dependent and water-related uses. It is the County’s
opinion that the addition of non water-dependent or related moored or anchored structures in this area
will exacerbate an already troublesome situation with no obvious public benefit.
Guidance as to the uses to which the area is suited is taken from state law. Section 403.061(10), Florida
Statutes directs the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to classify state waters according
to present and future beneficial use. These classifications are set forth in Rule 62-302.400, Florida
Administrative Code as Class I through V with I as potable water (highest) and V as navigation, utility and
industrial use (lowest). East Pass and environs are classified as Class II waters which is” Shellfish
Propagation or Harvesting” and also includes Class III waters which is “Fish Consumption; Recreation,
Propagation and Maintenance of a Healthy, Well-Balanced Population of Fish and Wildlife.” This
provides verification that by law the present and future beneficial use of this area is for water-resource
based uses.
D. Conclusions
1. The general area where the floating platform is being proposed is the most heavily used and
congested waterway in Okaloosa County which can be confirmed by the U.S. Coast Guard, Destin
Station. The County is concerned about the possible precedent and cumulative effect the granting of this
permit may have toward encouraging other floating platform businesses in this congested area.
2. The County has determined that unregulated, water-based aerial sightseeing businesses are not in the
public interest of the citizens of Okaloosa County, and has taken action toward regulating these through
zoning regulations which is the only regulatory avenue available.
Packet Pg. 372
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
SAJ-2013-00022 (SP-EPS)
August 8, 2013
Page 5
3. It is the County’s opinion that the locations for the floating platform as presented in the application
would be contrary to the public interest because: 1) there has been no demonstrated public or private
need for the proposal; 2) the proposal does not involve a water-dependent or water-related use in an
area of existing conflicts between legitimate water resource-based uses; 3) there are reasonable
alternative locations which are more suitable for an aerial sightseeing business, and; 4) there has been
no demonstration of any beneficial effect the proposal will have on public and private uses in area
where the present and future beneficial uses have been established as being best suited for water
resource based shellfish and fish harvesting and water-related recreation.
The County appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments and hopes the District Engineer will
find them useful toward making a decision on this permit application. Should there be any questions
please call Elliot Kampert, Growth Management Director at (850) 651-7524.
Sincerely
Don R. Amunds, Chairman
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Exhibits:
1 – Proposed Project Sites
2 – Court Order
3 – Newspaper Articles
4 – County Ord. No. 96-11
5 – Photos of the area
DRA/EK/tj
Packet Pg. 373
Packet Pg. 374
Packet Pg. 375
Packet Pg. 376
Packet Pg. 377
Packet Pg. 378
Packet Pg. 379
Packet Pg. 380
Packet Pg. 381
Packet Pg. 382
Packet Pg. 383
Packet Pg. 384
Packet Pg. 385
Packet Pg. 386
Packet Pg. 387
Packet Pg. 388
Packet Pg. 389
Packet Pg. 390
Packet Pg. 391
Packet Pg. 392
Packet Pg. 393
Packet Pg. 394
Packet Pg. 395
Packet Pg. 396
Packet Pg. 397
Packet Pg. 398
Packet Pg. 399
Packet Pg. 400
Packet Pg. 401
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: August 6, 2013
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Sunil Harman
SUBJECT: Rite Way Services Contract Renewal
DEPARTMENT: Airport
BCC DISTRICT: All
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: A proposed contract renewal, Amendment Number Three, for Rite
Way Service Inc., LLC is being presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval.
BACKGROUND: Rite Way Service, Inc., LLC requests to exercise its option to enter into a
contract renewal for a period of two years with mutual agreement. The contract renewal date
will begin June 7, 2013 and expire on June 6, 2015. The contract was in effect for two years and
the contract may be renewed for one additional two year period for a total of four years. The
certificate of insurance as well as the contract and lease internal coordination sheet is attached.
OPTIONS: Approve, Reject or Table.
RECOMMENDATIONS: It is Staff's recommendation that the Board approve the Contract
Renewal as described above.
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Ernie Padgett, County Administrator
Packet Pg. 402
Packet Pg. 403
Packet Pg. 404
Packet Pg. 405
Packet Pg. 406
Packet Pg. 407
Packet Pg. 408
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: August 6, 2013
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Sunil Harman
SUBJECT: First Amendment-Delta Airlines Lease/operating Agreement
DEPARTMENT: Airport
BCC DISTRICT: All
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Board of County Commissioners is requested to approve the
First Amendment to Delta Airlines' Lease and Operating Agreement.
BACKGROUND: Airline Leases and Operating Agreements at VPS expire
