READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 11-01-11 special kenwood — reading text
Part 7 of 14. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-30020-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
neighborhood.
We have recived the study and I am writing to let you know that it has been posted on the
City' s website at www.fwb.ore. Please contact my office if you do not have access to the
website, and my staff will be pleased to furnish a hard copy.
As always, thank you for your patience and I will let you know when this issue is
prepared for City Council consideration.
Sincerel
obert T. Meams
City Manager
CC: Mayor and City Council Members
Packet Pg. 34
3. t. c
City of Fort Walton Beach Y
Amriim'a MoslBroWifui Bta06a
10] Miracle Sv P Y. SW' Pon Wa Dm* r132
8%) U3-95M' FU( 850) 8939 '-
w M1b ore
Ton( 850) 933 -9925
lNS1 T..1%/ Y
MM VOr
October 13, 2011
Country Club Avenue Residents
When I wrote to you on September 26 ", l promised to contact you again when the
Kenwood Traffic Analysis was scheduled to go to Council.
A Special Council Meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, November 1°', 2011 in the
Council Chambers. It will begin at 6: OOpm. We will prepare additional seating in the
Annex if there is a need, and the meeting will be broadcast in the Annex.
The agenda for this meeting will be posted on the website no later than Friday, October
21". If you need any assistance in viewing the agenda or the backup documents, please
contact my office and my staff will gladly assist you. m0N
Please call my office with any comments you would like to share with City Council and
we will ensure your comments are circulated to the Mayor and all the Council Members.
As always, thank you for your patience and please call if you have any questions or need
assistance.
Sineerel
eobert T. Meams
City Manager
CC: Mayor and City Council Members
Packet Pg. 35
a?
r.'
Evaluation of Traffic and Safel
r r
ji,
Characteristics of Country Club Avenu _
o
F
in Kenwood Neighborhoo
av °
too
Prepared by z
Vmm
the John Scott Nike
x
F L(ORIDA I NSTITU M O r G OVERNMENT
at Merida State University
Ren Moses, Ph. D., P. E.
NN
Robert Lee, DPA, ICMA -CM A
ae
e
a
cm
Yy
ao P
em
i
R
Q
July 2011
Packet Pg. 36
3. 1. d
DISCLAIMER
The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the
authors and not necessarily those of the Florida State University.
METRIC CONVERSION FACTORS
I ti = 03045 to
1 mph = 1. 609 km/h
Packet Pg. 37
EXECUTIVE SUMMARV
Background
At the request of the City of Fort Walton Beach, traffic safety and operating characteristics of
some streets in the Kenwood neighborhood were reviewed. Kenwood Neighborhood is
sandwiched on the north by the Eglin Air Force Base, on the east by Garmier Bayou, on the
s<wth by Dons Bayou, and on the west by Lewis Turner Boulevard. The neighborhood is largely
residential and is comprised of single family homes and multiple family complexes. There are
three K -12 schools in this neighborhood — that is, Kenwood Elementary School, Pryor Middle
School, and Choctawhatchee High School. The existence of school children in this area adds to
the concern for highway safety by residents, particularly on the Country Club Avenue which
carries a substantial amount of traffic as revealed by recent traffic volume surveys and accident
experience.
Objectives
The overall goal of this study was to investigate traffic operations and safety characteristics of a
network of roadways in the Kenwood neighborhood. Consistent with this goal, the objectives of
this study were to quantify speed and volume characteristics of " through" traffic using the
neighborhood streets to access Lewis Turner Boulevard and Racetrack Road, which are the
major arterial roadways in the area; and to investigate traffic calming and other improvement
measures aimed at alleviating safety and operational problems, particularly on Country Club
Avenue which, together with Mooney Road, were observed to be the main streets preferred by
through" traffic as cut through roadways.
Findings
The results of traffic studies showed that Lewis Turner Boulevard and Racetrack Road are the
major arterials surrounding the neighborhood each carrying approximately 30,000 vehicles per
day. The review of 5 -year accident data showed that a total of 13 accidents were reported to
have occurred in this neighborhood but no definitive trend in crash type was observed from the
data. However, 11 of the 13 reported crashes occurred on Country Club Avenue ( five) and
Mooney Road ( six). The through traffic intending to access Lewis Turner Boulevard and
Racetrack Road use Kenwood neighborhood streets, particularly Country Club Avenue, as cut
through streets. Traffic data collected on Country Club Avenue show that it carries on the
average 3, 000 vehicles per day with an 85th percentile speed in excess of 35 miles per hour.
Two out of three " through" drivers choose the Country Club Avenue over Mooney Road as a cut
through street. In addition, the operating speed data showed that, on the average, seven out of
ten drivers exceed the 25 MPH speed limit on Country Club Avenue. From data analysis, it can
be sumtised that the level of tragic volume and the prevailing traffic speeds are quite high for a
roadway with geometries and neighborhood character resembling those seen on Country Club
Avenue.
Packet Pg. 38
u
Evaluation of Alternatives
Five alternative engineering improvement strategies aimed at reducing traffic volumes and
lowering traffic speeds along the Country Club Avenue were analyzed. The alternatives were:
i) the installation of slam route signs directing through traffic to Racetrack Road and Lewis
Tumor Boulevard; ( ii) the installation of radar speed feedback signs on Country Club Avenue in
the school zone area; ( iii) the installation of " chicane" traffic calming islands on the tangent
section of Country Club Avenue; ( iv) the installation of speed tables on the tangent section of
Country Club Avenue, and ( v) splitting the Country Club Avenue at Rue De Le Roi Street. All
alternatives were carefully analyzed in terms of their effectiveness in reducing traffic volume
and /or traffic speed, cost, case of implementation and preservation of neighborhood aesthetics.
The predicted eficcliveness of each alternative was graded either as LOW, MODERATE, or
HIGH as shown in Table 1.
fable I. Snmmarc of Improvcmmnt Alternatives Considered
Predicted Initial
Alternative
Effectiveness Cost
1. Install signs directing through
traffic to SR 188 and to SR 189
LOW 51, 000
Install Radar Driver Speed
1 Feedback Signs on Country MODERATE 8, 000
Club Avenue
3 Install " Chicanes" on Country
Club Avenue
HIGH 20, 000
4 Install Speed Tables on HIGH 30, 000
Country Club Avenue
5 Split Country Club Avenue at
Rue De Le Roi Street
MODERATE 15. 000
Recommendations
As shown in Table I above, the alternatives that are likely to have high impact on improving
operations along Country Club Avenue are the installation of chicanes or speed tables. It is
predicted that the implementation of either of these two alternatives would result in significant
speed reduction and lowering of the high level of traffic volume that currently passes through
Country Club Avenue. However, some residents in neighborhoods around the United States in
which speed tables were installed have complained of increased traffic noise and increased
emergency vehicles' response time. The installation of chicanes seems to be the most cost -
effective alternative with an added benefit of preserving neighborhood aesthetics. It is thercfone
recommended that the installation of chicanes on Country Club Avenue between Wedgewood
Lane and Mooney SE should be considered for implementation by the City of Fort Walton
Beach.
Packet Pg. 39
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY ........................................................... ........................... I.................. to
LISTOF TABLES ........................................................................................ ..... I.........................
vi
LISTOF FIGURES .................................. . ..........................................I
