READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 11-01-11 special kenwood — reading text
Part 12 of 14. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-30020-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
volume
on Country Club Avenue is hereby graded as HIGH. However, it should be noted that speed
Packet Pg. 56
tables have the disadvantage of reducing emergency vehicles response time by about three to five
seconds per table. In addition, some residents where speed tables have been installed complain
of increased traffic noise and reduction of neighborhood aesthetics due to increased traffic signs
and lane markings. The predicted cost of installing each speed table is $ 2, 000 to a high -end total
of $ 30,000. It is worth noting that this alternative was also evaluated for possible
implementation on Country Club Avenue by the Engineering & Utility Services Department of
the City of Fort Walton Beach ( Ref. 3).
8. 5 Alternative 5 —Split Country Club Avenue at Rue De Le Rol Street
This alternative considers splitting the Country Club Avenue at Rue De Le Roi Street by
creating three cul -de -sac arrangements as illustrated in Figure 10. This improvement alternative
will deny through traffic direct access to both ends of Country Club Avenue. However, the split
will open up Fairway Avenue and Powell Drive as alternative cut-through roadways in which a
through driver may use these roadways to access both ends of Mooney Road. At this point, it is
difficult to predict what percentage of drivers would divert to Fairway Avenue or Powell Drive.
We therefore rate the effectiveness of this alternative as MODERATE based on its potential of
reducing traffic volume on Country Club Avenue. However, longitudinal observation of traffic
behavior will be needed and further traffic calming measures may be needed should it be found
that some appreciable levels of cut- through traffic diverted to Fairway Avenue and Powell Drive.
In terms of cost, this alternative is likely to cost approximately $ 15. 000 to implement.
m0N
a 1
3. 1. d
Table 5 below summarizes the alternative improvement measures discussed above. The
table shows the alternative with its intended purpose, predicted longitudinal effectiveness, and
the estimated construction cost of the alternative.
Table 5. Summary of hnprovcment Alternatives Considered
Predicted Initial
Alternative Purpose
Effectiveness Cost
FO reduce ' thrtmgli'
I'
Install signs directing through LOR' SI, 000
unllic volume on Country
traffic to SR lBR and to 512189 Club Avenue
Install Radar Driver Speed To reduce percentage of
2. Feedback Signs on Country drivers exceeding the MODERATE 8, 000
Club Avenue seed limit
To reduce both traffic
3. Club
InstallAvenue
" Chicanes" on Country volume and vehicle speeds HIGH 20, 000
on Country Club Avenue
To reduce vehicle speeds
and possibly traffic
4 Install Speed Tables on HIGH 30, 000
Country Club Avenue volume on Country Club
Avenue
To reduce " through"
5' Split Country Club Avenue at
Rue De Le Roi Street
traffic volume on Country MODERATE 15, 000
Club Avenue
TheThe cwtcwt doesdoes notnot includeinclude suggestedsuggested intersectionintersection improvementimprovement andand mmovalmmoval ofof lanelane markings.markings.
9.9. CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS ANDAND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS
AtAt thethe requestrequest ofof thethe CityCity ofof FortFort WaltonWalton Beach,Beach, thethe studystudy reportedreported hereinherein waswas aimedaimed atat
reviewingreviewing traffictraffic operations operations andand safetysafety characteristicscharacteristics ofof aa number number ofof streetsstreets inin thethe KenwoodKenwood
neighborhood.neighborhood. TheThe reviewreview ofof traffictraffic operationsoperations showedshowed thatthat LewisLewis TurnerTurner BoulevardBoulevard andand
RacetrackRacetrack RoadRoad areare majormajor arterialsarterials surroundingsurrounding thethe neighborhoodneighborhood andand throughthrough traffictraffic wantingwanting toto
accessaccess thesethese twotwo majormajor highwayshighways useuse KenwoodKenwood neighborhoodneighborhood streets,streets, particularly particularly thethe CountryCountry
ClubClub Avenue,Avenue, asas crosscross streets.streets. TheThe reviewreview ofof traffictraffic datadata collectedcollected onon CountryCountry ClubClub AvenueAvenue
showedshowed thatthat itit carriescarries aroundaround 3,3, 000000 vehiclesvehicles perper dayday withwith anan 85"85" percentilepercentile speedspeed inin excessexcess ofof 3535
milesmiles perper hour.hour. InIn addition,addition, thethe datadata showedshowed thatthat onon thethe averageaverage sevenseven outout ofof tenten driversdrivers exceedexceed
thethe 2525 MPHMPH speedspeed limitlimit postedposted atat variousvarious locationslocations alongalong thethe CountryCountry ClubClub Avenue.Avenue. Clearly,Clearly,
bothboth traffictraffic volumevolume andand operatingoperating speedsspeeds areare highhigh forfor aa roadwayroadway withwith geometriesgeometries andand
neighborhoodneighborhood character character similarsimilar toto CountryCountry ClubClub Avenue.Avenue. TheThe reviewreview ofof 55- - yearyear traffictraffic crashcrash datadata
showed showed thatthat aa totaltotal ofof 1313 crashescrashes werewere reportedreported toto havehave occurredoccurred inin KenwoodKenwood neighborhoodneighborhood fromfrom
20042004 toto 2009.2009. However,However, thethe analysisanalysis ofof crashescrashes diddid notnot showshow anyany trendtrend inin accidentaccident typetype althoughalthough
CountryCountry ClubClub AvenueAvenue andand MooneyMooney RoadRoad accountedaccounted forfor I1I1 ofof thethe 1313 reportedreported crashes.crashes.
FiveFive alternativesalternatives aimedaimed atat alleviating alleviating thethe highhigh levelslevels ofof traffictraffic andand operatingoperating speeds speeds alongalong
CountryCountry ClubClub AvenueAvenue werewere considered.considered. TheThe alternativesalternatives consideredconsidered werewere thethe installationinstallation ofof statestate
makemake signssigns directingdirecting throughthrough traffictraffic toto useuse MooneyMooney RoadRoad toto accessaccess RacetrackRacetrack RoadRoad andand LewisLewis
PacketPacket P9P9« « 56'56'
..
Turner Boulevard, installation of radar driver speed feedback signs on Country Club Avenue.
installation of chicanes on Country Club Avenue, installation of speed tables on Country Club
Avenue, and splitting the Country Club Avenue at Rue De Le Roi Street. All alternatives were
carefully analyzed in terms of their likely effectiveness in reducing trattic volume and /or traffic
speed on Country Club Avenue. The effectiveness of each alternative was graded either as
LOW, MODERATE, or HIGH. The alternative that is likely to be highly effective in reducing
speed and volume while preserving neighborhood aesthetics is the installation of chicanes along
the straight portion of Country Club Avenue. It is therefore recommended that the City should
consider implementing this alternative along this residential road.
m0N
Packet Pg. 59
3. 1. d
REFERENCES
I. http 9www nwfdailvnews com/ news/killed- 30313 -walton -beach html as viewed on May 4,
2011.
2. 2009 Florida Traffic Information and Ilighway Data, Florida Department of Transportation,
Tallahassee, Florida, 2009.
3. 7Yrffic Study Resu /tv for Country Club Avenue, City of Fort Walton Beach Memorandum
from Engineering & Utility Services Director to the City Manager, Fort Walton Beach,
Florida, November S. 2010.
4. Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Washington, D.C.. 2000.
5. Manual on Oaiform Trtjjic Control Devices, Millennium Edition, Federal Highway
Administration, U. S. Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C., 2000.
3,t.a
APPENDIX A -- Characteristics of Streets Intersecting Country
Club Avenue
aN
Packet Pg. 62
Packet Pg. 63
F3 d
Packet Pg. 64
3. t .d
o.
m
v
vcn
ca
2
U
Uc3O
oc0
v
c
7
4
a
m
Packet Pg. 6S
F3 1.. d
WNbtv4
G
N_
V
Q
s S6
tCCt
UOUO
OO
OO
VV
3Op3Op
PacketPacket Pg.Pg. 6666
3. 1. d
m
G
w
VOm
OtiC
JGN
pk_
VkOw
v
Gv
I
Packet Pg. 67
3. 1. tl
APPENDIX B — Level of Service ( LOS) Analysis
Packet Pg. 66
