January Term, 1833
A constable and his sureties challenged a judgment over an execution he failed to return. The Supreme Court affirmed.
FILED WITH
Corrected reading edition includes every photographed source page as a facsimile appendix. Earlier abridged or inaccurate reading copies are not published. No audio is published: the existing generated recording has not passed a completeness check.
Five source pages checked, including the original court’s jury and partnership-name reasoning, which earlier transcriptions changed. Separate PDFs derived from the existing archival reading edition/transcription, retaining its uncertainty flags. This reformatting does not establish facts beyond the source or resolve earlier source limitations.
Five source pages checked, including the original court’s jury and partnership-name reasoning, which earlier transcriptions changed. Prepared 25 September 2026. Modern typesetting; historical wording retained.
PDF · 17.0 MB · 11 pages
Download ↓Five source pages checked, including the original court’s jury and partnership-name reasoning, which earlier transcriptions changed. Prepared 25 September 2026. Modern typesetting; historical wording retained.
File · 0.0 MB
Download ↓All source-view pages separated from the existing combined reading edition without changing their page content.
PDF · 17.0 MB · 5 pages
Download ↓Complete available archival transcription typeset as selectable text, preserving existing uncertainty flags.
PDF · 0.0 MB · 3 pages
Download ↓Condry et al. v. Henley & Murphey (1833). Reports of the Decisions of the Supreme Court of Alabama, 4 Stewart & Porter, January Term 1833, pp. 9–13.
Historical judicial report from 1833. Modern reading edition and source photographs supplied by the collection owner for public archival access.
Technical archive record ↓