READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — June 26, 2014 — VIII.a. Sheriff Funding Request — reading text
Part 3 of 4. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 07-VIII.a. Sheriff Funding Request.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
Marine Violations
Marine Violations
80 8000.00%
73
7200.00%
70 7000.00%
61
58 6000.00%
60 6000.00%
50 5000.00%
Change
40 37 4000.00%
Off
28 On
30 3000.00%
20 1750.00% 2000.00%
1300.00%
10 1000.00%
2 2 1 1
0.00%
0 0.00%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
Background
Okaloosa County has been funding life guard
services on the County’s Public Beaches with
TDC Revenues since 2008. Total appropriations
over the last five years total $4,078,542.68
additionally FY2014 appropriations totaled
$1,103,072. Most recently BOCC voted to
fund ½ the cost of a beach rescue vehicle.
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
Precedence
The most compelling precedence for approval of the
OCSO request is Okaloosa County’s long-standing
practice of funding lifeguard services with TDC revenues.
However, Okaloosa County does not stand alone in their
practice of funding public safety programs with TDC
revenues. Walton County also funds lifeguard services
with TDC revenues. Bay County funds tourist related
law enforcement activities with TDC revenues, as well.
Most recently, in 2014, Bay County appropriated
$100,000 of TDC revenues to fund additional law
enforcement operations/patrols in their tourist district
during spring break.
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
Opinion
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
AG Opinions
Florida Attorney General Opinions repeatedly give great
deference to the governing body of the county in
deciding if a particular activity or program satisfies the
requirements of F.S. 125.0104
– Attorney General Opinion No. 86-87
“However, in section 125.01(1)(w), F.S., county commissions
may perform any other acts not inconsistent with the law which are in the
common interest of the people of the county and exercise all powers and
privileges not specifically prohibited by law.”
– Attorney General Opinion No. 86-96
“Many counties use a portion of their tourist development tax revenues for arts and cultural activities. Although
the statutes do not specifically identify arts and culture as an authorized use of these collections, county
commissions have exercised some discretion by funding the programs and activities in order to enhance and
promote tourism.”
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
AG Opinions
– Attorney General Opinion No. 92-16
The Attorney General cited subsection (5) of s. 125.0104, F.S., and
reiterated the determination that since this subsection enumerates the authorized
uses of tourist development tax revenues, the implication is that any proposed use
not specifically listed is excluded. "To promote and advertise tourism in the State of
Florida and nationally and internationally;" is, however, an authorized use of tourist
development tax revenues pursuant to this subsection. Consequently, the Attorney
General offered the opinion that the determination as to whether a particular project
is tourist related and furthers the purpose of promoting tourism is one which must be
made by the governing body of the county. For that reason, the county would be
authorized to expend tourist development tax revenues to promote and advertise the
"Concert in the Park," if the governing body of the county makes the appropriate
legislative determination that such activity is primarily related to promoting tourism
in the county.
Of growing concern to all entities involved with local option tourist
development taxes is the determination as to who has the ultimate authority to
decide how tax revenues will be used.
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
AG Opinions
– Attorney General Opinion No. 92-66
(4) Ultimately, the determination of whether a particular expenditure satisfies
the requirements of s. 125.0104, F.S., is the responsibility of the governing body of
the county and cannot be delegated to the Attorney General’s Office.
Consequently, the
Attorney General gave the opinion that, ... based upon the appropriate legislative
finding by the governing body of the county that such a project promotes tourism,
construction of an artificial reef in order to promote snorkeling and diving or as a
basis for improving fishing in the coastal waters to attract tourists may be funded
by tourist development tax revenues...
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
AG Opinions
– Attorney General Opinion No. 92-66
(4) Ultimately, the determination of whether a particular expenditure satisfies
the requirements of s. 125.0104, F.S., is the responsibility of the governing body of
the county and cannot be delegated to the Attorney General’s Office.
Consequently, the
Attorney General gave the opinion that, ... based upon the appropriate legislative
finding by the governing body of the county that such a project promotes tourism,
construction of an artificial reef in order to promote snorkeling and diving or as a
basis for improving fishing in the coastal waters to attract tourists may be funded
by tourist development tax revenues...
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
AG Opinions
Attorney General Opinion No. 98-74
The AG stated, however, that it was his opinion that the expenditure of tourist
development tax revenues for the construction of a new memorial at the Orange
County Courthouse must be based on a determination by the county’s governing
body that the memorial is directly related to tourism and furthers the purpose of
promoting tourism in Orange County. Further, the opinion stated that any such a
determination “must show a distinct and direct relationship between expenditure
of tourist development tax revenues and the promotion of tourism.”
Attorney General Opinion No. 2000-25
The AG concluded that the governing body of Okeechobee County may
exercise its authority to decide, based upon an appropriate legislative
determination, that the promotion of an event has as its main purpose the
attraction of tourists for which tourist development funds under s. 125.0104, F.S.,
may be used.
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil liberties and preserving public safety; Doing so with professionalism and unity of purpose,
while being good stewards of the public’s trust”.
AG Opinions
Attorney General Opinion No. 2000-50
The opinion further stated that the use does not appear
outside of the realm of use; however, governing body of the
county must make a factual determination of whether a
particular facility or project is related to tourism and
primarily promotes that purpose. The determination must
show a distinct and direct relationship between tax revenue
expenditure and tourism promotion. Accordingly, the
opinion concluded that if such findings are made,
then the tax revenues could be used for welcome
signs and welcome islands.
The Mission of the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: “Ensuring fair and equal administration of the law,
safeguarding civil
