READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — January 18, 2013 — AG P&T Amendment — reading text
Part 1 of 1. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 114-AG P_T Amendment.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
From: KEN DANLEY [KENDANLEY@AUD.STATE.FL.US]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 3:24 PM
To: Jim Curry
Cc: Don Amunds; MARILYN ROSETTI; JIM KIEDINGER
Subject: Preliminary and Tentative Finding Revision
Mr. Curry,
As requested, I am forwarding the revised Preliminary and Tentative Finding No. 17.
Please don’t hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Ken Danley, CPA, CGFM
Audit Coordinator
State of Florida Auditor General
(850) 484-5138
Fax: (850) 484-5112
In the event your response contains information that may be considered sensitive or
confidential, please do not send that information via fax or email. Please contact me
to make alternative arrangements to provide the information.
Finding No. 17: Tourist Development Taxes – Statutory Compliance
As discussed in the Background section of this report, Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, governs the use of
tourist development taxes and indicates the various purposes for which they may be used. This Section
further provides that any use of tourist development taxes not expressly authorized is prohibited. During the
period May 2010 through May 2012, the County paid $1,912,095.68 from tourist development taxes to fund a
portion of lifeguarding and beach patrol services provided by the City of Destin Fire Department and the
Okaloosa County Beach Safety Department. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, does not expressly authorize
such expenditures as allowable uses of tourist development taxes.
In response to our inquiries, County personnel provided three opinions from legal counsel indicating that
tourist development taxes may be used to fund lifeguard and beach patrol services, provided that the BCC
makes a legislative determination that the primary purpose of these services is related to either promoting
tourism within the County or the improvement or enhancement of beach facilities. However, in Attorney
General Opinion No. 90-55, dated July 23, 1990, the Attorney General concluded that tourist development
taxes may not be used to fund lifeguarding services or general governmental functions owed to the public at
large.
During the period May 2010 through May 2012, the County also used $564,000 in tourist development taxes
to fund a portion of the County’s beach shuttle service. Section 125.0104, Florida Statutes, does not expressly
authorize such expenditures as allowable uses of tourist development taxes. As part of its tourist development
plan in effect during the period May 2010 through May 2012, the BCC concluded that providing beach
shuttle services was a proactive step to reduce seasonal tourism traffic congestion and encourage efficient and
environmentally friendly transportation choices, established a permanent and dependable connection between
the beaches and adjacent tourist destinations, and was necessary to promote the convention center and
provide an alternate mode of access thereto. However, transportation services are a general government
function owed to the public at large and, as such, do not appear to be an allowable use of tourist development
taxes. Beginning with the 2012-13 fiscal year, the BCC funded the beach shuttle services from other revenue
sources.
Recommendation: The County should seek an opinion from the Attorney General as to the
allowability of the $2,476,095.68 of questioned expenditures and, if appropriate based on the Attorney
General’s opinion, should restore this amount to the tourist development taxes accounts.
