READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 10-09-2006 (joint, city/county) — reading text
Part 2 of 2. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13240-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
the master planning process can continue
independent of a decision to make an offer to the County; the Council must first make
that decisions.
The negotiations parameters consist of site location, sale or lease,
price per acre,
amenities in lieu of dollars and any other issues that may be pertinent.
Site Location
When the County initially considered site locations on the
City' s Lewis Turner Property,
they provided four layouts; negotiating parameters may be based on the
configurations listed below and detailed in Attachment B; or a different configuration
as determined by Council.
Schematic Ai - Depicts a 3- story building with 656 parking spaces overlaid
on the one ball field and playground area adjacent to the s fire station.
City'
Schematic A2 - Depicts a 5- story building with 734 parking spaces overlaid on
one ball field and playground area
adjacent to the City' s fire station.
Schematic A3 - Depicts a 3- story building with 650 parking spaces overlaid
on the parking lot portion of this property.
Schematic A4 - Depicts a 5- story building with 367 surface parking and 210
structured/ covered parking spaces overlaid on the parking lot portion of the
property.
Sale or Lease
A decision of whether to sell or lease the property is one of the first issues that must
be decided, assuming Council desires to forward with presenting an option to
move
the Board of County Commissioners. Some conditions may be applicable.
1. If sold, the property should remain in the
corporate limits of the City.
2. Whether there is a decision to sell or lease, a proviso should be added
to ensure that the property is used for public purpose now and in the
future.
3. The City would have first right of refusal to repurchase
property.
4. Water and Sewer service area for this
property will remain with the City.
Price per Acre
The City purchased the property on Lewis Turner Blvd for $ 4. 0 million and the sales
analysis utilized to develop the appraisal showed adjusted sale prices ( between May
2002 and May 2004) of $ 83, 364/$ 228, 571 per acre. The per acre
purchase price for
this property was $ 93, 963. ( Attachment C). Although the property was valued as one
5Th ere have been some questions about the extent of usage of the softball fields. Council Request 31- 2006 dated April
25, 2006 addressed that issue and is provided as backup. In addition, this information was updated
by staff and shows
comparative figures for the last three years. ( Both are available as Attachment A.)
Page 3
unit, certain values were ascribed to different portions, mostly based on their front
footage to Lewis Turner Blvd.
Unit 1 - Fairgrounds - $ 1.00 million 1 $ 43, 822 per acre
Valued as vacant and restored
22. 82 acres and included most of the fairgrounds and their
improvements.
Unit 2 - Softball Complex - $ 1.75 million/$ 140, 789
Valued as highest and best use
12.43 acres and is essentially the City' s softball complex area.
This has considerable frontage along Lewis Turner Blvd.
portion
Unit 3 - Primarily the Parking and Farmer' s Market Area - $ 1.25 million
1$ 170, 766 per acre
Valued as highest and best use
7. 32 acres and is the parking area for the complex and the area where
the Farmer' s Market is conducted.
This portion has frontage along Lewis Turner Blvd.
Amenities in lieu of Dollars
The Council should determine whether they are interested in offsetting a portion or the
entire estimated sale price for certain amenities. For example, construction of
community center, a parking garage, joint participation in a recreation complex,
softball fields, emergency management, etc.
Other Issues
conditions that the City Council wish to add to the
Any other issues or may
agreement.
CONCLUSION:
The City Council should determine if they desire to make a formal offer to the County
for the sale or lease of City property for the purpose of constructing a Judicial Center
Annex Expansion. If they are so inclined a motion should be brought forward.
If Council is interested in making a formal offer, determine whether Master Planning
offer; and provide the City Manager
process should proceed independent of the formal
site location, sale lease, price per acre, amenities in
specific direction with regard to or
lieu of dollars and any other issues of interest to the City.
Respectfully Submitted,
l~ l\/ n
I A
a;fJla~
Attachments:
A - Field Usage
B- Site Location
C- Appraisal
Page 4
I Mayor/ Council Request I
REQUEST # 31/2006
DATE: April 25, 2006
TO: Jeff Peters, Parks & Recreation Director
FROM: Joyce Shanahan, City Manager
SUBJECT: Request for information
Councilman Pullen has requested the following information/action:
How much are the Ball Fields at the Fairgrounds utilized?
Please take the necessary steps to complete the request and submit a Summary Report no later
than ( five days) Tuesday, May 2, 2006.
TO: Joyce Shanahan, City Manager ~
FROM: JefIPeters, Parks and Recreation Director
RE: Councilman - Request for Information
Information is attached X
SUMMARY REPORT
Prepared by: IeffPeters
Approved by:
Department Director/ Staff time to complete: ~
