READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 05-20-08 special minutes — reading text
Part 2 of 3. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-14628-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
reduction. We believe that service levels in 2006 were no different than today
and this was just two years ago!
2. Cost per associate has risen from about $ 42K 48K
to $ since 2006. Reduce this amount by 5%.
Areas to consider are changes to the benefit structure, increases in span of control for supervisors
and combining management positions. This would save about $875K.
3. Continue the work to consolidate some services such as Fire, EMS and possibly vehicle maintenance.
4. Change from a defined benefit to a defined contribution retirement plan.
5. Require ALL Enterprise funds to have a balanced budget.
6. Take another hard look at the Management Advisory Group study and implement appropriate
recommendations.
Overall the recommendations made by the City Manager look productive, meaningful and are moving in
the right direction.
Now you are faced with the tough decisions and I know you are up to the task.
Thanks for this opportunity to speak to you."
Kabe Woods
Jim Tucker, owner of The Boat Marina & Boat Yard at 36 Miracle Strip Parkway SW, stated it is very
difficult to make a living in this town at this time; his business is off about 30- 50% than in 01/ 02. He
commented Council is in a position now to do what needs to be done by cutting back.
Mr. Minich moved to budget a 2% COLA for all employees (fire union excluded) effective October
1, 2008 pending funding availability. Mr. Reeves seconded motion.
Discussion ensued with varying views expressed on providing a COLA which included the need to look at
employee cuts but those left should have a COLA; when business is soft you do not get an increase; a
COLA destroys incentive to work hard; that the step/ merit increase is the incentive; that the policy
decision is to give guidance for budget preparation; that merit increases should be performance based; a
merit increase should be for over and above and not satisfactory work to recognize employees doing
outstanding work.
There was consensus on the need for a workshop to discuss the step/ merit performance compensation
structure.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion to budget a 20,{,COLA for all employees ( fire union
excluded) effective October 1, 2008 pending funding availability and it carried by a vote of 4 to 2
with Holmes, Reeves, Hartwell, and Minich in favor and Garvie and Pullen opposed (Miller absent).
142 Special Council 5- 20- 08
BUDGET POLICY ISSUES cont.
Strateaic Plan Goal: ComDensation Alternative
Policy Decision: Should one week of vacation be offered to full-time employees in lieu of a percentage
step/ merit anniversary adjustment?
The presentation included information that employees are eligible for a step/ merit performance increase
on theiranniversary date. General employees receive 3%, police officers 3. 5%, and firefighters 7. 0%
contingent upon a satisfactory performance evaluation. Department directors, supervisors, and ~
professional staff are eligible for up to 3. 5% depending on their evaluation score; offering vacation hours
r,
I::~~~:~ I: : e~;~~~~~~~~~:;~ ~;~~~
f~~~~~:: ~~:: ~~~~~~~ 1:~~~ ~~~ 7:U~I~~~~. 6~~~
08. There would be no payout of these hours in the event of separation from employment and any
unused hours would be forfeited 9- 30- 09. Use of these hours must not result in overtime in the
department. It was noted the fire union would be excluded because of contractual obligations.
Staff recommendation is to endorse providing 40 hours of vacation in lieu of a percentage step/ merit
adjustment ( fire union excluded) for FY 2008- 09.
Mr. Minich moved to suspend all merit/step increases except contractual employees. Mr. Reeves
seconded motion.
Discussion ensued with an exchange of views with those in favor and those against providing 40 hours of
vacation in lieu of a step/ merit adjustment.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion to suspend all merit/step increases except contractual
employees and it carried by a vote of 4 to 3 with Reeves, Hartwell, Minich, and the Mayor in favor
and Holmes, Garvie, and Pullen opposed ( Miller absent).
Strateaic Plan Goal: Healthcare Benefits
Policy Decision: Should the City contribution rates be modified for medical insurance?
The presentation included information that the City pays 75% of employee and 75% of dependent medical
coverage; of the City' s 230 medical insurance participants, 42% elect employee coverage and 58% elect
dependent coverage; the current City portion is $ 3, 334 annually for employee coverage and $ 5, 779
annually for dependent coverage; and a recent survey of local jurisdictions revealed that almost all of the
respondents ( 78%) pay 100% of the employee portion of the medical insurance premium. The remaining
12% of the respondents either pay 90% or 93% of the employee portion. The respondents to this survey,
on average, pay 52% of the premium for dependent costs.
Staff recommendation is to modify City contribution to 50% dependent over 3 years and modify City
contribution for new hires 10- 1- 08 to 75%/ 50%.
Discussion ensued on the compensation rates with clarification given that there are no freezes on vacant
positions, that there are positions that will not be filled, and there is about one turn over every week of
existing positions.
Mr. Hartwell moved to amend the City' s Personnel Rules and Regulations to reflect that the City
will contribute 750lc. of the premium for employee medical insurance coverage and 50% of the
premium for the dependent portion of family medical insurance for all new hires effective October
1, 2008. Mr. Holmes seconded motion.
U
During brief discussion there was reluctance to change health benefits for existing employees.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion and it carried unanimously with Holmes, Reeves,
Garvie, Pullen, Hartwell, and Minich in favor (Miller absent).
Special Council 5- 20- 08 143
BUDGET POLICY ISSUES cont.
Strateaic Plan Goal: Defined Contribution Plan
Policy Decision: Should the City offer a defined contribution plan to new General Employees in lieu of a
defined benefit plan?
The presentation included information that the Defined Benefit Plan pension benefit is calculated based
on years of service, themultiplier, and final average compensation; the Defined Contribution Plan pension
benefit is a result of investment performance rather than a calculated dollar amount; the General
employees contribute 5% of wages, the City is budgeted to contribute 140A>>
of general employees wages
in FY 2007- 08; the City expense to the existing plan could be reduced by increasing employee
contributions or decreasing the benefit multiplier; and the Police and Fire Pension Plans receive State
contributions and cannot have different benefits for new hires.
Staff recommendation is to authorize staff to explore the possibility of a General Employees Defined
Contribution Plan.
During some discussion it was noted there would be the need for an actuary to do a study to help with
calculations and will take several months to complete so it may be a mid- year adjustment for the 2008- 09
budget year. Staff will provide an estimate on the cost of a study for Council approval.
Kabe Woods, 240 Brooks Street, voiced support of a Defined Contribution Plan and mentioned one of the
benefits to the employees is the ability to move their retirement plan as they move through jobs.
Mr. Garvie moved to authorize staff to explore the possibility of a General Employees Defined
Contribution Plan and how much it would cost to move forward. Mr. Minich seconded motion and
it carried unanimously with Holmes, Reeves, Garvie, Pullen, Hartwell, and Minich in favor (Miller
absent).
RECESS
The meeting,-cecessed at 7: 27 p. m.
RECONVENE
The meeting' reconvened at 7: 40 p. m.
BUDGET POLICY ISSUES cont.
Other Issue: SeDaration Incentives
Policy Decision: Should the City offer incentives to encourage employees to voluntarily separate?
The presentation included information that in light of property tax reform and declining revenues, it is
necessary to reduce personnel costs which account for 53% of total expenses and 74% of General Fund
expenses; payroll savings would be derived from a reduction of the salary and associated payroll taxes for
a new hire versus the existing employee, reclassification of the position once vacated, or elimination of the
position altogether; the early retirement incentive would vary from $ 15K - $ 30K depending on years of
service; and the voluntary separation incentive would be 1 week pay for the first year of service and 2
weeks pay for each year thereafter, up to 16 weeks max.
Staff recommendation is to authorize an Early Retirement Incentive Program, and authorize a Voluntary
Separation Incentive Program.
The City Manager mentioned that the City would have complete discretion on who is allowed to go and
when they leave and added that they have not targeted any specific employee. She said if this is
approved tonight staff will begin the process, and will not bring it back to Council.
Mr. Minich moved to authorize an Early Retirement Incentive Program and to authorize a Voluntary
Separation Incentive Program. Mr. Garvie seconded motion and it carried unanimously with
Holmes, Reeves, Garvie, Pullen, Hartwell, and Minich in favor (Miller absent).
144 Special Council 5- 20- 08
BUDGET POLICY ISSUES cont.
Other Issue: Utility Tax CaD
Policy Decision: Should the monthly caps and exemptions for the utility tax be removed?
The presentation included information that per Chapter 4. 05 of the City' s Code of Ordinances, a
utility tax
is levied at a rate of 10% against electric, gas, and water purchases; the tax is limited to
currently
20/ month for residential consumers and $ 50/ month for non- residential consumers; the tax is not levied
on the first 50 kilowatt hours per month of residential use; the
Attorney General has issued several ~
opinions stating that caps and limitations on the dollar amount taxed under Florida Statute 166.231 " Public !
er; and staff estimates additional revenue of $379K ifthe public service tax (
ea~:~:~~~ utility
t:
Staff recommendation is to remove the residential and commercial utility tax caps and residential
usage
exemption.
The City
