READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 03-18-08 special minutes — reading text
Part 4 of 9. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-14322-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
court; he is doing an investigation in the work place.
Dr.Pullen asked if he had contacted Mr. Mattimore so he could obtain personnel records from the Human
Resources Director. Mr. Mattimore replied he and Dr. Pullen have had conversations, and may have had
email communications, and a telephone call about public records. Dr. Pullen asked if that was because
he was having trouble getting personnel records from Human Resources. Mr. Mattimore believe that was
so, thequestion was the status of documents that may be a complaint pending an investigation and he
wanted some clarification on that.
Dr. Pullen asked Mr. Mattimore why he did not take depositions when doing an investigation, how else he
could arrive at the truth. Mr. Mattimore replied he arrives at the truth by having people come in and speak
candidly and honestly on tape so there is a record of what they have to say. He said he has no authority
to depose people, it is not a legal proceeding, it is not a matter under the Civil Rules of Florida or Federal
Rules of Procedure; it is an investigation authorized by the Mayor.
3~ pecial Council 3- 11- 08
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS cant.
Dr. Pullen asked if the Charter said something about taking depositions or
subpoena individuals. Mr.
Mattimore believed it said they could subpoena documents or subpoena individuals, but he did not need
to do that. Dr. Pullen asked Mr. Mattimore if anyone expressed to him their reluctance to talk because of
possible retribution. Mr. Mattimore replied yes, people said to him they were concerned they would be
retaliated against if they spoke, but then they spoke.
Mr. Hartwell asked Mr. Mattimore his definition of hostile work environment. Mr. Mattimore
replied hostile
work environment is treatment that is pervasive and severe enough so that it interferes with the
D
ability of
the employees to perform their duties.
Mr. Hartwell referenced the 53 pages of documents sent by the Finance Director
indicating harassment
from the City Manager and asked Mr. Mattimore if he would define the actions of the
City Manager
as
producing a hostile work environment. Mr. Mattimore replied he did not. He said it is one person' s
communications about a series of dialogue between the two of them, but that was not evidence to him
sufficient to find a hostile work environment between these two individuals. He said
they obviously are not
communicating as well as they should, but he did not find it hostile.
Mr. Minich asked Mr. Mattimore how many investigations like this he has conducted. Mr. Mattimore
replied there have been several this year but he did not have a number over the course of his career.
Mr. Miller asked Mr. Mattimore if he would say that Ms. Absher works in a hostile work environment. Mr.
Mattimore replied he would say no.
COMMENTS FROM GENERAL PUBLIC
The Mayor opened the floor for comments from the general public.
Maureen Horgan, 187 Rose Marie Lane, expressed disappointment that some Council members have
apparently formed an opinion or made a decision before the results of the investigation were known, and
voiced those decisions in the media. She commented that city residents want Council members to be
open- minded and to make informed decisions based on fact after investigating an issue. She expressed
her belief that the issue is not about the relationship between two people but rather the friction and
negative work environment within the City that appears to have started about 1 ~ year ago. She voiced
her pride in being a City resident and dislike of anyone speaking negatively about it as she has
personally
witnessed the Finance Director has done. She mentioned other evidence Council has been
given in the
past stated the same type of information and expressed that no one, especially a Department Head,
should make disparaging and derogatory comments about the City Manager, other Department Heads,
and other City employees again and again. She discussed loyalty, loyalty to someone who have
given
years of excellent, hard professional work and stated she has never known or heard the City Manager say
anything negative about City employees, any of the Department Heads and not about the City. She
stated the City Manager has always been positive and upbeat, and
extremely professional. She
discussed loyalty to the City and to its employees who work hard every day and deserve respect and said
it is time to listen to the employees, to what they want and what they need, because a
wrong decision on
Council' s part could be so very wrong.
Lee McDonald, 10 Rue de Ie Roi, asked Mr. Mattimore how long he and the firm have worked for the
Mr. Mattimore replied he has worked here since the mid 1980' s but did not know how
this type of work for the City during this interim period. Mr. Mattimore
employment lawyer, does work for the City.
City.
his firm
long
predates his involvement. Mr. McDonald asked Mr. Mattimore if he knew of any other firm that has done
thought Mr. Linn, a labor
I
Mr. McDonald asked if this investigation is the type of investigation that should be out for bid. The
Mayor
stated that question is not relevant.
Special Council 3- 11- 08 3 ,9
COMMENTS FROM GENERAL PUBLIC cant.
Mr. McDonald stated he was interviewed by Mr. Mattimore' s assistant and
thought he was very
forthcoming; he let him speak his piece. He said he had some things he felt affected the investigation;
however, he did not see anything in the report on it. He relayed his main
complaint, which he brought to
Council before and they completely ignored it. He recalled when he
relayed to Council that the Finance
Director had not seen the Landmark proposal and parking
garage until the day of the Council meeting.
He commented that did not stir any reaction from Council and asked if
they
were when the
listening
people speak.
Daphne Bower, 624 Kenmore Avenue, stated that Lisa Absher is a neighbor and friend, who has been
nothing but kind to her family and to her son. She expressed disbelief that a person changes their spots
just because they walk in the door of work and she thinks Lisa Absher is a fine upstanding individual.
Jeff Main, 75 Waynell Circle SE, stated he is a disgruntled citizen and asked
why Council continues to let
the Finance Director terrorize the staff. He relayed that the Finance Director told his wife that he should
not attend public Council meetings, and remarked that is Council's citizen that
employee telling
a private
he cannot come to a Council meeting. He said even after several
complaints Council did not act and it
took the leadership of the Mayor to stand up and take
charge, and he felt that was Council's He job.
commented that the Charter is the law; it is not working and needs to be fixed. He
expressed that the
majority of Council tied the hands of the City Manager and the Human Resource Director in how they
dealt with the Finance Director' s continual abusive behavior toward
City staff. He expressed his belief
that Council did not have the political will and courage to say made a mistake when they hired the
they
Finance Director; it is not a good fit for the City. He said this could have been taken care of one
year ago
when it was brought up and everyone ignored it. He said by
perpetuating the toxic relationship between
the City Manager and the Finance Director, people played the two
against each other, it was public and
made a mockery of Council and continues to make a mockery of Council in the
public. He commented it
appears about 980/0 of the employees and Directors have publicly voiced their support for the City
Manager. He stated as a citizen that attends Council meetings on a regular basis he felt he is relatively
well informed on the issues that face the City, and expressed he has lost
complete confidence in the
majority of the executive body' s ability to conduct business of the City in an
intelligent, unbiased and
professional manner. He said recent statements to the press by certain Councilmen have reaffirmed that
belief.
Bill Robinson, 672 Marionette, United Way Director, wished to go on record to
