READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 08-08-2006 (executive) — reading text
Part 17 of 22. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13096-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
undeniable that in fact the
proxy' s decision is not in accord with the criteria fit only Theresa Schiavo.
patient' s known desires or the provisions of
this chapter." Ch. 92- 199, ~ 2 at 1842, In sum, although chapter 2003- 418 applies to a
Laws of Fla.; ~ 765. 105, Fla. Stat. (2003). limited class of people, it provides no criteria to
guide the Governor' s decision about whether to act.
In contrast to the protections set forth in chapter In addition, once the Governor has issued a stay as
765, chapter 2003- 418' sstandardless, open- ended provided for in the Act, there are no criteria for the
delegation of authority by the Legislature to the Governor to evaluate in deciding whether to lift the
Governor provides no guarantee that the stay. Thus, chapter 2003- 418 allows the Governor
patient' right to withdraw to act " through whim, show [ ] favoritism, or
incompetent s
life- prolonging procedures will in fact be honored. exercis[ e] unbridled discretion," Lewis, 346 So. 2d
See In re Guardianship of Browning, 568 So. 2d 4, at 56, and is therefore an unconstitutional
12 ( Fla. 1990) ( reaffinning that an incompetent delegation of legislative authority.
person has the same right to refuse medical
treatment as a competent person). As noted above,
the Act does not even require that the Governor CONCLUSION
consider the patient' s wishes in deciding whether to
issue a stay, and instead allows a unilateral decision We recognize that the tragic circumstances
underlying this make it difficult to
by the Governor to stay the withholding of case put
life- prolongingprocedures without affording any emotions aside and focus solely on the legal issue
procedural process to the patient. presented. Weare not insensitive to the struggle
that all members of Theresa' s family have endured
14] Finally, we reject the Governor's argument that since she fell unconscious in 1990. However, we
the Legislature' s grant of authority to issue the stay are a nation of laws and we must govern our
under chapter 2003- 418 is a valid exercise of the decisions by the rule of law and not by our own
state' s parens patriae power. Although emotions. Our hearts can fully comprehend the
unquestionably the Legislature may enact laws to grief so fully demonstrated by Theresa' s family
protect those citizens who are incapable of members on this record. But our hearts are not the
law. What isin the Constitution always must
protecting their own interests, see, e.g., In re Byrne,
402 So.2d 383 ( Fla. 1981), such laws must comply prevail over emotion. Our oaths as judges require
with the constitution. Chapter 2003- 418 fails to do that this principle is our polestar, and it alone.
so.
As the Second District noted in one of the multiple
Moreover, the
argument that the Act broadly appeals in this case, we " are called upon to make a
protects those who cannot protect themselves is collective, objective decision concerning a question
belied by the case-specific criteria under which the of law. Each of us, however, has our own family,
Governor can exercise his discretion. The Act our own loved ones, our own But in the
children....
applies only if a court has found the individual to be end, this case is not about the * 337 aspirations that
in a persistent vegetative state and food and loving parents have for their children." Schiavo IV.
So.2d at 186. Rather, decision today
hydration have been ordered withdrawn. It does 851 as our
Q 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.
8/ 3/ 2006
https:// web2. westlaw .com/print/printstream. aspx?utid=%257b87F 1 E849- A561- 497D- 9703- 0CFDA...
Page 16 of I 7
885 So. 2d 321 Page 16
885 So. 2d 321, 29 Fla. L.Weeldy S515
Cite as: 885 So. 2d 321)
makes clear, this case is about maintaining the 885 So. 2d 321, 29 Fla. L.Weekly S515
integrity of a constitutional system of government
with three independent and coequal branches, none Briefs and Other Related Documents ( Back to top)
of which can either encroach upon the powers of
another branch or improperly delegate its own 2004 WL 1868947 ( Appellate Brief) Reply Brief
of Appellant Jeb Bush, Governor of the State of
responsibilities.
Florida ( Aug. 16, 2004)
The continuing vitality of our system of separation 2004 WL 1696763 ( Appellate Brief) Answer
of powers precludes the other two branches from Brief (Jut. 23, 2004)
nullifying the judicial branch' s fmal orders. If the 2004 WL 1713754 ( Appellate Brief) Answer
Legislature with the assent of the Governor can do Brief ( Jul. 23, 2004) Original Image of this
what was attempted here, the judicial branch would Document ( PDF)
be subordinated to the final directive of the other 2004 WL 1713757 ( Appellate Brief) Brief of
branches. Also subordinated would be the rights of Amici Curiae Not Dead Yet et al. In Support of
individuals, including the well established privacy Appellant and Requesting Reversal Organizations
right to self detennination. See Browning, 568 Joining as Amici Curiae, Not Dead Yet, Adapt, The
So. 2d at 11- 13. No court judgment could ever be ARC of the United States ( fonnerly the Association
considered truly final and no constitutional right for Retarded Citizens), Center on Human Polic y,
truly secure, because the precedent of this case Syracuse University, Center on Self Detennination,
would hold to the contrary. Vested rights could be Disability Rights Center, Freedom Clearinghouse,
stripped away based on popular clamor. The Hospice Patients' Alliance, Mouth Magazine,
essential core of what the Founding Fathers sought National Council on Independent Living, National
to change from their experience with English rule Disabled Students Union, National Spinal Cord
would be lost, especially their belief that our courts Injury A ( Jul. 12, 2004) Original Image of this
exist precisely to preserve the rights of individuals, Document ( PDF)
even when doing so is contrary to popular will. 2004 WL 1592660 ( Appellate Brief) Initial Brief
of Appellant Jeb Bush, Governor of the State of
The trial court' s decision regarding Theresa Schiavo Florida ( Jul. 01, 2004) Original Image of this
was made in accordance with the procedures and Document ( PDF)
2004 WL 1600009 ( Appellate Brief) Amicus
protections set forth by the judicial branch and in
accordance with the statutes passed by the Curiae Brief of Terri Schiavo' s Parents Mary and
Robert Schindler Supporting Appellant and Filed
Legislature in effect at that time. That decision is
final and the Legislature' s attempt to alter that final with the Consent of the Parties ( Jul. 2004)
unconstitutional as applied to
is 2004 WL 1600010 ( Appellate Brief) Initial Brief
adjudication
Theresa Schiavo. Further, even if there had been of Appellant Jeb Bush, Governor of the State of
no final judgment in this case, the Legislature Florida ( Jul. 2004)
2004 WL 1696764 ( Appellate Brief) Amicus
provided the Governor constitutionally inadequate
standards for the application of the legislative Curiae Brief of Terri Schiavo' s Parents Mary and
authority delegated in chapter 2003- 418. Because Robert Schindler Supporting Appellant and Filed
with the Consent of the Parties ( Jul. 2004)
chapter 2003- 418 runs afoul of article II, section 3
of the Florida Constitution in both respects, we 2004 WL 1713758 ( Appellate Brief) Amicus
affinn the circuit court' s final summary judgment. Curiae Brief of Terri Schiavo' s Parents Mary and
Robert Schindler Supporting Appellant and Filed
