READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — August 2, 2016 — Public Hearing - Young Future Land Use Map Amendment & Rezoning — agenda request — reading text
Part 1 of 1. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Public Hearing - Young Future Land Use Map Amendment & Rezoning — agenda request — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: August 2, 2016
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Elliot Kampert
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Young Future Land Use Map Amendment & Rezoning
DEPARTMENT: Growth Management
BCC DISTRICT: 3
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE: Consideration of a request changing the use of land submitted
by Tom Young relating to property located off Garrett Pit Road, Crestview. The request is to
change the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation for the property
from Agriculture (AG) to Low Density Residential (LDR), or a more restrictive FLUM
designation. If the FLUM amendment is approved, request to rezone the property from
Agriculture (AG) district to Residential - 1 (R-1) district, or a more restrictive zoning district.
Property contains 9.5 acres, more or less.
BACKGROUND:
Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Element Policy 9.2 provides criteria that must be
considered for plan amendments that change lands designated as “agriculture” or “rural
residential” to another FLUM designation. These criteria and the applicant’s response to
each follows (see Exhibit 1). This application involves a proposed amendment to both the
‘agricultural” and “rural residential” FLUM categories.
In the evaluation of proposed land use amendments for land in the “agricultural” or
“rural residential” categories, the application shall demonstrate the following:
a. the need for such land use amendment;
Applicant response: there is a substantial need for lots of all sizes south of
Crestview, Florida.
b. the amendment will not result in urban sprawl;
Applicant response: This development will not result in urban sprawl as lots are to
be one half acre lots.
c. a functional relationship of the proposed amendment to other more densely or
intensely designated or developed lands;
Applicant response: This parcel of property is located off Garrett Pit Road in
Crestview, Florida, South of I-10 and will enable me to construct a Boulevard
Entrance to the 200 acre tract of land to be developed at a future date.
d. the availability of facilities and services for a more dense or intense land use;
Applicant response: This parcel will enable me to provide a good fire lane out of this
Subdivision to be known as Cherry Brooke.
e. the relationship of the proposed amendment site to the urban development area
boundary.
Applicant response: This subdivision is located in the approved urban development
area.
Staff note: The property is not within the Urban Development Boundary
The proposed amendment and rezoning site is located within the Eglin North
Encroachment Zone. This will necessitate review by Eglin officials to determine possible
impact.
In October, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners approved a large-scale amendment
submitted by Tom Young changing 194 acres abutting this requested change from “rural
residential” to “low density residential.”
The Planning Commission recommended approval of a 9.9 acre change to LDR for this
same applicant on October 8, 2015.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of a 9.9 acre change to LDR for this
same applicant, and a 9.9 acre change to LDR for the applicant’s grandson Alec Strayer
for separate adjacent properties on October 8, 2015.
This requested change appears to be part of a land assembly that will be added to the 194
acres previously approved.
The subject property is adjacent to existing LDR FLUM and R-1 zoning as well as
Agriculture FLUM and zoning, and is considered compatible with and a reasonable
transition against adjacent LDR, R-1, AG, and AA FLUM and zoning classifications.
There does not appear to be any “bona fide farm operations” occurring on the adjacent
agriculture parcels that would invoke the 30 foot buffer required by Future Land Use
Element Policy 10.14A.
PUBLIC COMMENT/OPPOSITION: None to date.
PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval at a public hearing held July 14, 2016.
MILITARY REPRESENTATIVE: The Military Representative advised Mr. Young at the
Planning Commission public hearing that development of the property may be subject to noise
impact from military missions and should also be subject to down-facing lighting considerations.
STAFF POSITION: Staff has no objection to the requested FLUM amendment and rezoning.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board consider the facts presented herein,
the Planning Commission recommendation, as well as any facts that may be presented during the
public hearing, and then either approve or deny the requested Future Land Use Map amendment
and associated re-zoning.
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
John Hofstad, County Administrator
