READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
The Gold-Bug — Edgar Allan Poe (reading text) — reading text
Part 6 of 8. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Complete local reading text and source notice
Reading transcription · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
application, resolve. In fact, having once established
connected and legible characters, I scarcely gave a thought to the mere
difficulty of developing their import.
“In the present case—indeed in all cases of secret writing—the
first question regards the language of the cipher; for the principles of
solution, so far, especially, as the more simple ciphers are concerned,
depend upon, and are varied by, the genius of the particular idiom. In
general, there is no alternative but experiment (directed by
probabilities) of every tongue known to him who attempts the solution,
until the true one be attained. But, with the cipher now before us, all
difficulty was removed by the signature. The pun upon the word ‘Kidd’ is
appreciable in no other language than the English. But for this
consideration I should have begun my attempts with the Spanish and French,
as the tongues in which a secret of this kind would most naturally have
been written by a pirate of the Spanish main. As it was, I assumed the
cryptograph to be English.
“You observe there are no divisions between the words. Had there been
divisions, the task would have been comparatively easy. In such case I
should have commenced with a collation and analysis of the shorter words,
and, had a word of a single letter occurred, as is most likely, (a or I,
for example,) I should have considered the solution as assured. But, there
being no division, my first step was to ascertain the predominant letters,
as well as the least frequent. Counting all, I constructed a table, thus:
Of the character 8 there are 33.
; “ 26.
4 “ 19.
‡ ) “ 16.
* “ 13.
5 “ 12.
6 “ 11.
† 1 “ 8.
0 “ 6.
9 2 “ 5.
: 3 “ 4.
? “ 3.
¶ “ 2.
-. “ 1.
“Now, in English, the letter which most frequently occurs is e.
Afterwards, succession runs thus: a o i d h n r s t u y c f g l m w b k
p q x z. E predominates so remarkably that an individual
sentence of any length is rarely seen, in which it is not the prevailing
character.
“Here, then, we leave, in the very beginning, the groundwork for something
more than a mere guess. The general use which may be made of the table is
obvious—but, in this particular cipher, we shall only very partially
require its aid. As our predominant character is 8, we will commence by
assuming it as the e of the natural alphabet. To verify the
supposition, let us observe if the 8 be seen often in couples—for e
is doubled with great frequency in English—in such words, for
example, as ‘meet,’ ‘.fleet,’ ‘speed,’ ‘seen,’ been,’ ‘agree,’ &c. In
the present instance we see it doubled no less than five times, although
the cryptograph is brief.
“Let us assume 8, then, as e. Now, of all words in the
language, ‘the’ is most usual; let us see, therefore, whether there are
not repetitions of any three characters, in the same order of collocation,
the last of them being 8. If we discover repetitions of such letters, so
arranged, they will most probably represent the word ‘the.’ Upon
inspection, we find no less than seven such arrangements, the characters
being ;48. We may, therefore, assume that ; represents t, 4
represents h, and 8 represents e—the last being now
well confirmed. Thus a great step has been taken.
“But, having established a single word, we are enabled to establish a
vastly important point; that is to say, several commencements and
terminations of other words. Let us refer, for example, to the last
instance but one, in which the combination ;48 occurs—not far from
the end of the cipher. We know that the ; immediately ensuing is the
commencement of a word, and, of the six characters succeeding this ‘the,’
we are cognizant of no less than five. Let us set these characters down,
thus, by the letters we know them to represent, leaving a space for the
unknown—
t eeth.
“Here we are enabled, at once, to discard the ‘th,’ as forming no portion
of the word commencing with the first t; since, by experiment of the
entire alphabet for a letter adapted to the vacancy, we perceive that no
word can be formed of which this th can be a part. We are thus
narrowed into
t ee,
and, going through the alphabet, if necessary, as before, we arrive at the
word ‘tree,’ as the sole possible reading. We thus gain another letter, r,
represented by (, with the words ‘the tree’ in juxtaposition.
“Looking beyond these words, for a short distance, we again see the
combination ;48, and employ it by way of termination to what
immediately precedes. We have thus this arrangement:
the tree ;4(‡?34 the,
or, substituting the natural letters, where known, it reads thus:
the tree thr‡?3h the.
“Now, if, in place of the unknown characters, we leave blank spaces, or
substitute dots, we read thus:
the tree thr...h the,
when the word ‘through’ makes itself evident at once. But this
discovery gives us three new letters, o, u and g,
represented by ‡, ? and 3.
“Looking now, narrowly, through the cipher for combinations of known
characters, we find, not very far from the beginning, this arrangement,
83(88, or egree,
which, plainly, is the conclusion of the word ‘degree,’ and gives us
another letter, d, represented by †.
“Four letters beyond the word ‘degree,’ we perceive the combination
;46(;88.
“Translating the known characters, and representing the unknown by dots,
as before, we read thus:
th.rtee,
an arrangement immediately suggestive of the word ‘thirteen,’
and again furnishing us with two new characters, i and n,
represented by 6 and *.
“Referring, now, to the beginning of the cryptograph, we find the
combination,
53‡‡†.
“Translating as before, we obtain
good,
which assures us that the first letter is A, and that the first two
words are ‘A good.’
“It is now time that we arrange our key, as far as discovered, in a
tabular form, to avoid confusion. It will stand thus:
5 represents a
† “ d
8 “ e
3 “ g
4 “ h
6 “ i
* “ n
‡ “ o
( “ r
; “ t
? “ u
“We have, therefore, no less than eleven of the most important letters
represented, and it will be unnecessary to proceed with the details of the
solution. I have said enough to convince you that ciphers of this nature
are readily soluble, and to give you some insight into the rationale of
their development. But be assured that the specimen before us appertains
to the very simplest species of cryptograph. It now only remains to give
you the full translation of the characters upon the parchment, as
unriddled. Here it is:
“‘A good glass in the bishop’s hostel in the devil’s seat forty-one
degrees and thirteen minutes northeast and by north main branch seventh
limb east side shoot from the left eye of the death’s-head a bee line from
the tree through the shot fifty feet out.’”
“But,” said I, “the enigma seems still in as bad a condition as ever. How
is it possible to extort a meaning from all this jargon about ‘devil’s
seats,’ ‘death’s heads,’ and ‘bishop’s hotels?’”
“I confess,” replied Legrand, “that the matter still wears a serious
aspect, when regarded with a casual glance. My first endeavor was to
divide the sentence into the natural division intended by the
cryptographist.”
“You mean, to punctuate it?”
“Something of that kind.”
“But how was it possible to effect this?”
“I reflected that it had been a point with the writer to run his words
together without division, so as to increase the difficulty of solution.
Now, a not over-acute man, in pursuing such an object, would be nearly
certain to overdo the matter. When, in the course of his composition, he
arrived at a break in his subject which would naturally require a pause,
or a point, he would be exceedingly apt to run his characters, at this
place, more than usually close together. If you will observe the MS., in
the present instance, you will easily detect five such cases of unusual
crowding. Acting upon this hint, I made the division thus: ‘A good glass
in the Bishop’s hostel in the Devil’s seat—forty-one degrees and
thirteen minutes—northeast and by north—main branch seventh
limb east side—shoot from the left eye of the death’s-head—a
bee-line from the tree through the shot fifty feet out.’”
“Even this division,” said I, “leaves me still in the dark.”
“It left me also in the dark,” replied Legrand, “for a few days; during
which I made diligent inquiry, in the neighborhood of Sullivan’s Island,
for any building which went by the name of the ‘Bishop’s Hotel;’ for, of
course, I dropped the obsolete word ‘hostel.’ Gaining no information on
the subject, I was on the point of extending my sphere of search, and
proceeding in a more systematic manner, when, one morning, it entered into
my head, quite suddenly, that this ‘Bishop’s Hostel’ might have some
reference to an old family, of the name of Bessop, which, time out of
mind, had held possession of an ancient manor-house, about four miles to
the northward of the island. I accordingly went over to the plantation,
and re-instituted my inquiries among the older negroes of the place. At
length one of the most aged of the women said that she had heard of such a
place as Bessop’s Castle, and thought that she could guide me to it, but
that it was not a castle nor a tavern, but a high rock.
“I offered to pay her well for her trouble, and, after some demur, she
consented to accompany me to the spot. We found it without much
difficulty, when, dismissing her, I proceeded to examine the place. The
‘castle’ consisted of an irregular assemblage of cliffs and rocks—one
of the latter being quite remarkable for its height as well as for its
insulated and artificial appearance. I clambered to its apex, and then felt
much at a loss as to what should be next done.
“While I was busied in reflection, my eyes fell upon a narrow ledge in the
eastern face of the rock, perhaps a yard below the summit upon which I
stood. This ledge projected about eighteen inches, and was not more than a
foot wide, while a niche in the cliff just above it gave it a rude
resemblance to one of the hollow-backed chairs used by our ancestors. I
made no doubt that here was the ‘devil’s seat’ alluded to in the MS., and
now I seemed to grasp the full secret of the riddle.
“The ‘good glass,’ I knew, could have reference to nothing but a
telescope; for the word ‘glass’ is rarely employed in any other sense by
seamen. Now here, I at once saw, was a telescope to be used, and a
definite point of view, admitting no variation, from which to use it. Nor
did I hesitate to believe that the phrases, ‘forty-one degrees and
thirteen minutes,’ and ‘northeast and by north,’ were intended as
directions for the levelling of the glass. Greatly excited by these
discoveries, I hurried home, procured a telescope, and returned to the
rock.
“I let myself down to the ledge, and found that it was impossible to
retain a seat upon it except in one particular position. This fact
confirmed my preconceived idea. I proceeded to use the glass. Of course,
the ‘forty-one degrees and thirteen minutes’ could allude to nothing but
elevation above the visible horizon, since the horizontal direction was
clearly indicated by the words, ‘northeast and by north.’ This latter
direction I at once established by means of a pocket-compass; then,
pointing the glass as nearly at an angle of forty-one degrees of
