READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 04-14-09 regular minutes — reading text
Part 2 of 4. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-16644-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Library's handicap scooter maintenance expense.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR OCTOBER 1, 2008 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 BUDGET TO MAKE CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS TO APPROPRIATIONS OF CITY FUNDS TO PAY FOR LIBRARY SCOOTER
REPAIRS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
GENERAL PUBLIC
Jeff Main, 75 Waynell Circle, discussed his concern regarding Council protocol and conduct and the
alleged use by a Councilman of using the forum as a " bully pulpit" in an attempt to influence new
Council members, and his plans to review documents with two other citizens and raise a flag if they
find unnecessary requests from Council members.
ORD. 1785: EXTEND VALIDITY OF CURRENT DEVELOPMENT ORDERS
Ordinance 1785 temporarily preempting Section 13.202.D of the Code of Ordinances to extend
validity of current Development Orders to March 30, 2012.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TEMPORARILY
PREEMPTING SECTION 13. 202. 13 ( A/ K/A 13. 20. 1) DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND BUILDING
PERMIT GUIDELINES AND SECTION 13. 312. 1- 1 ( A/ K/A 13. 30. 12. 1- 1), EXPIRATION OF APPROVAL,
OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO EXTEND VALIDITY OF CURRENT DEVELOPMENT
ORDERS TO MARCH 30, 2012; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL NOT BE CODIFIED;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND SUNSET PROVISION.
The Acting City Manager recalled at the last Council meeting that City Council postponed the request
for two site plans extensions as they realized the ordinance would be brought forward in the near
future. He mentioned it was scheduled to appear before the CRA and MPB at their April meetings but
neither Board was able to have a quorum at their meetings so the ordinance was placed on the
agenda before City Council for first reading. He said City Council has the choice of directing it to the
MPB and /or the CRA. He said this ordinance does not really affect the Land Development Code and
will not be incorporated into it as it is a temporary measure. He said it is City Council' s choice, if they
adopt it on first reading, to direct it to the MPB or the CRA for their review and input.
Regular Council 4 -14 -09 157
ORD. 1785 cont.
The City Attorney acknowledged it would need a motion to send it to the MPB. She explained the
reason it was brought forward as it came up in January from staff and the ordinance was fashioned so
that basically all it is doing is extending the Development Orders and it is not making any changes to
the Land Development Code, it is not changing anyone' s site plans. She said the idea of granting the
benefit to the seven developments that are pending would mean it could go forward without a
recommendation from the MPB or the CRA simply because it is really not within their purview to
review those items. She said they did not have a quorum at the last meetings so it came forward.
She said it is not really required to come with a recommendation from them but Council has that
choice, and it would take a motion either way because it is here on first reading.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Janet Wilson, 368 Gardner Drive, stated as Chairman of the Municipal Planning Board respectfully
requested Ordinance 1785 be sent back to the Planning Board for review and feedback. She said the
Planning Board serves as an advisory board to Council on planning issues and she thought Council
deserves to have their input before moving forward on this ordinance.
As no one else wished to speak the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Reeves moved to re- direct Ordinance 1785 to the Municipal Planning Board and the CRA.
Mr. Patterson seconded motion.
Brief discussion included comments that the Board' s input is appreciated; and it was asked if the
Board could bring information with the names of the developments that would be covered by the
ordinance, date of original approval, and whether those projects meet current City Codes and if not,
which ones, and a recommendation whether a review of the Eglin height limitations is in order.
The City Attorney advised in the exhibit attached to the ordinance in the backup are seven of the
plans with those dates of approval. She said there is one development that does not meet the current
height requirements of the current Land Development Code but it did at the time it was approved.
She said this ordinance would not be the vehicle to re- address those development orders if they
choose to because the two pending from the last meeting Council has approval authority and can
either grant those extensions or deny them. She said if Council wants to have them brought back
they would need to make a motion to take them off the table and bring them back to Council the next
time. She said this ordinance is really not at all to address that because that would be a quasi -judicial
hearing on each of them and every one affected by the Development Order would be noticed and they
would be here.
There was some question whether there would be time to direct the ordinance to the Boards and still
meet the date the two projects were postponed on their requests for extension or whether that date
would need to be extended.
Missy McKim, Development Services Director, recalled the two site plans before Council for
12th.
extensions were postponed until May She said the MPB and CRA meet the first week in May so
12th 26th.
the ordinance will not come to Council for first reading until May then second reading on May
She said she and the City Attorney had that discussion and because those projects are in progress
either staff would ask Council to extend them again until the ordinance caught up with it or continue it.
The City Attorney said Council would continue the Alta Vista discussion and the Alconese Terrace
discussion for another meeting. She confirmed that discussion would need to be an agenda item for
the next meeting.
There was some discussion on whether the ordinance could be adopted on first reading with second
reading held after the Board' s meeting.
158 Regular Council 4 -14 -09
ORD. 1785 cont.
Mr. Holmes moved to amend the motion to adopt Ordinance 1785 on first reading and to
postpone second reading until after the CRA and MPB Board make recommendations. Mr.
Garvie seconded motion and it carried unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie,
Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion as amended to adopt Ordinance 1785 on first
reading and to redirect Ord. 1785 to the MPB and CRA Boards with second reading postponed
until after the CRA and MPB Boards review and make recommendations and it carried by a
vote of 6 to 1 with Holmes, Miller, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor and
Reeves opposed.
MAYOR PRO -TEM
Consideration of a Council member to serve as Mayor Pro Tern from April 1, 2009 through March 31,
2010.
Mr. Miller nominated Bill Garvie.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Bill Garvie as Mayor Pro-Tern from
April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it carried unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves,
Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES
Consideration of Council representatives to the Economic Development Council ( EDC) from April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010.
Mr. Holmes nominated Virgil Miller as the representative.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Virgil Miller as representative to the
Economic Development Council ( EDC) from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it carried
unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
Mr. Holmes nominated Bill Patterson as the alternate.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Bill Patterson as alternate to the
Economic Development Council ( EDC) from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it carried
unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES
Consideration of Council representatives to the Tourist Development Council (TDC) from April 1, 2009
through March 31, 2010.
Mr. Reeves nominated Bobby Nabors as the representative.
Mr. Miller nominated Bill Garvie as the representative.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Bill Garvie as representative to the Tourist
Development Council and it failed with Miller and Garvie in favor.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Bobby Nabors as representative to
the Tourist Development Council ( TDC) from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it
carried with Holmes, Reeves, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
Regular Council 4 -14 -09 159
TDC REPRESENTATIVES cont.
Mr. Reeves nominated Mike Holmes as the alternate.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Mike Holmes as the alternate to the
Tourist Development Council ( TDC) from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it carried
unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
HEAD START BOARD REPRESENTATIVES
Consideration of Council representatives to the Headstart Board from April 1, 2009 through March 31,
2010.
Mr. Holmes nominated Dick Rynearson as the representative.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Dick Rynearson
as the
representative to the Headstart Board from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it carried
unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
Mr. Reeves nominated Virgil Miller as the alternate.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Virgil Miller as the alternate to the
Headstart Board from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it carried unanimously with
Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in favor.
OKALOOSA COUNTY LIBRARY COOPERATIVE REPRESENTATIVES
Consideration of Council representatives to the Okaloosa County Library Cooperative from April 1,
2009 through March 31, 2010.
Mr. Holmes nominated Bill Garvie as the representative.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Bill Garvie as the representative to
the Okaloosa County Library Cooperative from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it
carried unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in
favor.
Mr. Miller nominated Dennis Reeves as the alternate.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Dennis Reeves as the alternate to
the Okaloosa County Library Cooperative from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 and it
carried unanimously with Holmes, Miller, Reeves, Garvie, Nabors, Patterson, and Rynearson in
favor.
OKALOOSA HOUSING PARTNERS REPRESENTATIVES
Consideration of Council representatives to the Okaloosa Housing Partners from April 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2010.
Mr. Reeves nominated Bill Garvie as the representative.
The Mayor called for the vote on the nomination to appoint Bill Garvie as the representative to
the Okaloosa Housing Partners from April 1, 2009
