READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE

Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 06-27-2006 ‎(regular)‎ — reading text

Part 9 of 12. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.

Machine-extracted text — fwb-13070-original.pdf

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed

Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.

to the residential uses with the following minimum landscape features: ( 1) shade trees a minimum of 12 feet in height, 2.5" caliper at 4 feet above natural grade, placed a maximum of 50 feet on center; (2) hedge material a minimum 24 inches high, planted at a maximum of 4 feet on center; and ( 3) a decorative fence, a minimum 50 per cent line opaque and a maximum of 6 feet high shall be installed along the property to the residential uses." The same narrative should also be inserted nto the adjacent requirements for General Commercial land use designation. Public comment: There were no proponents or opponents Y/ho wished to speak. LPA recommendatia1: Mrs. Aascx>moved to recxmmend to City Council to amend the Future Land Use Element narrative for Generalized Land Use, Commercial to reduce 1he distance from residential land uses from 500 feet to 150 feet for buildings built required to the maximum height i1 the RC, RegiooaI Commercial and Ge, General Commercial land use designations; a1d to i1dude staffs proposed Ia1guage that "The 150 foot required separatia1from residential uses for wikflflQs ~ 45 feet in height must include a minimum 15 feet wide Ia1dscaped buffer area adjacert to the residential uses with the foIlO\Ning mi1imum landscape features: (1) shade tJees a minimum c:l12 feet in height, 2.5"caliper at 4 feet above natural grade, placed a maximum c:t 50 feet a1 center; 2) hedge material a minirrum 24 inches high, planted at a maxirrum rl4 feet on center; and (3) a deCDrative fence, a mi1imum 50 per cent opaque and a maxirnJm of 6 feet hig1 shall be i1s1a11ed along the property rne adjacent to the residential uses." Mr. McDonald seoonded motia1 CIld it canied lI1animously with FIasco, Gen:: ak,McDonald, Scott, and Wayre in favor (GIoIer and Wilson absent). 5)MPB Case#06- 11-CP06- 1: Request by VICtor and Margherita DeMoya to amend the future land use designation on the Future Land Use Map ( FLUM) from MDR, Medium Density Residential to MUCC, Mixed-Use Community Commercial for the foUowing:: Lots 1 through 9 and Lot 10, less and except the North 60 feet thereof, Block 2, Oakland Addition to Fort Walton Beach, as Recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 144, of the Public Records of Okaloosa County, Florida. The area proposed indudes approximately 3.61 aaes located at 401 Hollywood Boulevard ~. 4 Staff reoommendation: Recommend approval Public oomment There were no proponents or opponents who YtIished 10 speak. Ronald W. WUiams, agent for the applicants, had no objection to 1he staff report. LPA recornmendatia1: Mr. Scott moved to recommend to City Cou1a1 approval of the request for an amendment to the Future Lald Use Map designation from PL, Public Lands to MUCC, Mixed Use ComrntI1ity Commercial on the Future Land Use Map for the property located at 401 HoIIyY.ood Blvd fWV. Mr. Wayne secxx1ded motion and it carried unanimously with FIasoo, Gercak, McDonald, Scott, and Wayre i1 favor ( Glover and Wisoo absent). 6) MPB Case #06-2Q-CPOO- 1: Request from City to amend future land use designation on the Future Land Use Map ( FLUM) series from PL, Public Lands and LOR, Low Density Residential to CON, Conservation, for three with a land parcels area of approximately 4. 11 acres located at 330 Lake Drive NW and 115 Vrrginia Drive NW. Staff reammendation: Recommend approval. Public cxmment There ere \\ no proponents or opponents who YtIished to speak. LPA recomrnendatia1: Mrs. FIasa>moved to reoommend to City Cou1a1 approval ct the request that the designation CX'1 the property shan be changed from PL, PubfIC Lands to CON, Conservation CX'1 the Future Land Use Map, for the area proposed that inc:kxtes three parcels with a land area ct approximately 4.11 acres CIld is located at 330 Lake Drive.MN and 115 Vrginia Drive NW. Mr. W~ secxx1ded rnoticrI. An exd1a1ge c:l views were expressed CX'1 the use ct the property which incJuded the property should be sold for devebpment;that if needed for housi1g in the future it can be changed; and that there is a need for green space. Mr. Gercak called for the vote CX'1 the motion and it canied lI1aI1imousIy with FIasoo, Gercak, McDonald, Scott, and Wayre i1 favor ( Gkwer and Wisoo absent). 7) MPB Case #06- 21-CP06- 1: Request from City to amend future land use designation on the Future Land Use Map ( FLUM) series from Ge, General Commercial to PL, Public Lands for the following parcels: 1) Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Brooks Addition to Fort Walton, and 2) The East 100 feet of Lots 14 and 15, and the North 25 feet of Lot 16, Block 2, Brooks Addition to Fort Walton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, at Page 99, of the Public Records of Qkaloosa County, Florida. The area proposed includes approximately 0.63 acres located at 122 Hollywood Boulevard SE (Hollywood Church of God in Christ). 5 Staff reOOrnmendation: Recommend approval. Public comment There were no proponents or opponents wro Vished \ to speak. LPA recommendation: Mr. Wayne moved 10 recommend to City Council approval ci 1he located at 122 request 10 amend the Land Use Map designation for the. property Lands, on the Future Hollywood Blvd. SE from GC, General Commerdallo PL, Plbfac Land Use Map. Mr. McDonald seoonded motion and it carried tnanimously with FIasco, Gercak, McOa1aId, Scott, and ' Ison absent). W8:jf1e in favor (Glover and M In summary, the Municipal Planning Board! Local Planning Agency recommended approval of all requests in the Amendment package except for MPB Case#()&. 12-CP06- 1, which was recommended for denial and Case 06- 19-CP06- 1, which the Board concurred with staffs amended recommendation to reduce the zone from 500 feet to 150 feet, and to require a buffer area adjacent to residential land uses with specific landscaping and buffering requirements. DISCUSSION: Staff has endosed the following items relevant to consideration of the proposed amendment 1) Ordinance 1705 ( draft 5- 50 -0) as drafted by staff and presented at the pubfic wI Exhibit - A" C - ity of Fort Walton Beach Neighborhoods (Map); Exhibit "8"- hearing Plan for Neighborhood Action for W.E. Combs Neighborhood; and Exhibit "C" L-egal Description for 115 Virginia Drive and 330 Lake Drive ~. 06) as recommended by MPBlLPA wI Exhibit " 2) Ordinance 1705 (draft 6-1- An-City of Fort Walton Beach Neighborhoods ( Map); Exhibit - 8"-Plan for Neighborhood Action for W.E Combs Neighborhood; and Exhibit " C" -Legal Description for 115 Virginia Drive and 330 Lake Drive ~. 3) Municipal Planning Board minutes of public hearing June 1, 2006. 4) Executive Summary of the May 2006 Amendments to Directions-The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Fort Walton Beach: 2008, which generally desaibes the nature and location of the proposed changes and the process of amending a comprehensive plan. the 5)Report to MPBlSupport Documents-Staff has induded in its report to the LPA data and analysis for the proposed amendments in the fonn of S"upport Data and for Comprehensive Plan Amendments to: T Directions- he Comprehensive Analysis Plan of the City of Fort Walton Bead1: 2008",Submittal CP06-1 May 2006. This doaJment describes in detail the various requests for amendments, the rationale for each, and proposes a recommendation. B" and "C" -The proposed amendments which have been It It, " Ordinance 1705 wlExhibits A placed in the Office of the City Clerk and the City Ubrary for the public's accessibility. 6 Ordinance 1705 wlExhibits "A","B",and " C" including all four proposed oomprehensive plan amendments has been advertised in the Northwest Florida Daily News for a Proposed Phase Public before City Council at their meeting on Tuesday, June 27, 2006. Hearing The City Council may: considered Approve the amendments proposed as Ordinance 1705 that was by the Municipal Planning BoardlLocal Planning Agency at its public hearing on June 1, 2006, as advertised; or the Approve amendments proposed in Ordinance 1705 recommended by MPB and the Staff, which excludes Case#06- 12-CP06- 1 ( Ordinance 1705 MPB recommendation draft 6- 1-06) . Approve any other combination of amendments that it may elect to make; or Approve no changes to the Comprehensive Plan. 1705 Comprehensive Plans must be adopted and amended by ordinance. Ordinance provides for the various amendments to the new plan entitled The Directions- Comprehensive Plan of the City of Fort Walton Beach: 2008. Ordinance 1705, as proposed, incorporates all of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan within the body of the Ordinance in Sections II, III, IV and V. Exhibits "A", " 8"and "C" are attad1ed. The effective date of the Ordinance will be the date of the issuance of the Final Order by DCA or the Administration Commission) in which the Plan is found "In Compliance". Staff has drafted a version of Ordinance 1705 which include the feCX)mmendations of the MPBlLPA, an altemate ordinance for consideration of City Council at the Proposal Public Hearing on first reading at their meeting on June 27, 2006. This draft ordinance contains amendments to the Comprehensive Plan recommended by the Municipal Planning Board at their public hearing on June 1, 2006. As previously mentioned, the Municipal Planning Board! Local Planning Agency recommended approval of all requests in the Amendment package except for MPB Case#06- 12-CP06- 1, vvhich was reoommended for denial and Case 06- 19-CP06- 1, ' Nhich the Board conQJrred with staffs amended recommendation to reduce the zone from 500 feet to 150 feet, and to require a

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓