READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — January 20, 2015 — County's Response to Preliminary and Tentative Findings — reading text
Part 5 of 5. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
County's Response to Preliminary and Tentative Findings — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
agrees that there have been no similar reimbursement agreements
during the operative period. However, the County would additionally note that the issue related to
reimbursement of overcharged medical support services provided by the County was addressed with BP
and a full and complete resolution of that issue has been reached. The County has reimbursed those funds
that both the County and BP have agreed were the amount overcharged.
Motor Vehicles
Finding No. 21: Fuel Cards
Previously Reported
The BCC had not established adequate controls over the use of fuel cards. We recommended that the BCC
strengthen its vehicle usage procedures to include more reasonable fuel consumption parameters, the
effective use of fuel card exception reports and user department reconciliations of fuel charges to gas
receipts, and the retention of all gas receipts by user departments.
16
Results of Follow-Up Procedures
The BCC’s actions corrected this finding. Our review of July 2014 fuel card purchases by the TDD
disclosed the BCC was using reasonable fuel consumption parameters, effectively using fuel card
exception reports and user department reconciliations of fuel charges to gas receipts, and retaining all gas
receipts.
COUNTY RESPONSE: The County concurs with the Results of the Follow-Up Procedures directed
to the previous Findings and agrees that the BCC has fully and completely addressed and implemented the
recommended corrective actions.
Accounting Controls
Finding No. 22: Classification and Reporting of Expenditures
Previously Reported
The CCC incorrectly classified and recorded certain expenditures in the accounting records, contrary to
guidance provided by the Florida Department of Financial Services in the Uniform Accounting System
Manual for Florida Counties (Manual). We recommended that the CCC strengthen its procedures to
ensure that expenditures are properly classified and recorded in accordance with the Manual.
Results of Follow-Up Procedures
The CCC’s actions corrected this finding. Our review of 15 purchases totaling $372,692 made during
the period January 2014 through July 2014 disclosed that expenditures were properly classified and
recorded in accordance with the Manual.
COUNTY RESPONSE: The County and the CCC concur with the Results of the Follow-Up
Procedures directed to the previous Findings and agree that the CCC has fully and completely addressed
and implemented the recommended corrective actions.
Electronic Funds Transfers
Finding No. 23: Controls over Electronic Funds Transfers
Previously Reported
The BCC had not adopted written policies and procedures, and the BCC had not established adequate
controls over the authorization and processing of electronic funds transfers (EFTs).
We recommended that the BCC develop written policies and procedures addressing EFTs as required by
Section 668.006, Florida Statutes, including providing for an adequate separation of duties over access to
17
BCC assets and the related accounting records, and documenting independent approvals before the funds
are transferred. We also recommended that the CCC revise its funds transfer agreement with the bank to
address the deficiencies noted and timely update its funds transfer agreement with the bank when changes
in authorized personnel occur.
Results of Follow-Up Procedures
The CCC’s actions corrected this finding. The CCC, which makes EFTs on behalf of the BCC, adopted
a policy that addresses the authorization and processing of EFTs as required by Section 668.006, Florida
Statutes. This policy requires a dual control for EFT transactions whereby one employee initiates the EFT
and a second employee must approve the EFT. Our review further disclosed that the CCC’s funds transfer
agreement with the bank was updated and included only authorized current CCC employees.
COUNTY RESPONSE: The County and the CCC concur with the Results of the Follow-Up
Procedures directed to the previous Findings and agree that the CCC has fully and completely addressed
and implemented the recommended corrective actions.
Information Technology Controls
Finding No. 24: Access Controls
Previously Reported
The BCC had not established adequate controls over employee access privileges to data and information
technology (IT) resources. We recommended that the BCC strengthen its procedures to include the
periodic review of IT access privileges granted to employees and timely remove or modify unnecessary or
incompatible access privileges detected.
Results of Follow-Up Procedures
The CCC’s actions corrected this finding. The CCC, who maintains the accounting records for the BCC,
adopted and implemented several policies requiring independent reviews of journal entry reports and
changes made to the payroll system and master vendor file. In October 2013, the CCC also adopted a
policy requiring the CCC’s Financial Services Manager to review employee access to all financial
software systems. In October 2014, the CCC’s Financial Services Manager performed and documented
such a review.
COUNTY RESPONSE: The County and the CCC concur with the Results of the Follow-Up
Procedures directed to the previous Findings and agree that the CCC has fully and completely addressed
and implemented the recommended corrective actions.
Public Records
Finding No. 25: TDC and TDC Subcommittee Meeting Minutes
18
Previously Reported
The BCC did not record minutes of a TDC and TDC subcommittee meeting, contrary to law. In addition,
the minutes of the remaining meetings were not signed or otherwise designated to indicate the minutes
were the official minutes approved by the TDC or TDC subcommittees.
We recommended that the BCC continue to strengthen its procedures for maintaining official minutes of
the TDC and TDC subcommittees by recording minutes for all meetings and requiring that the final
approved minutes made available for public inspection be signed by the TDC or TDC subcommittee
chairman and the employee who recorded the minutes.
Results of Follow-Up Procedures
The BCC’s actions corrected this finding. The last remaining TDC subcommittee was abolished in
February 2013. Our review of the official minutes of the TDC meetings indicated that minutes were
maintained for all TDC meetings and were signed by the TDC chairman and the Tourist Development
Director.
COUNTY RESPONSE: The County concurs with the Results of the Follow-Up Procedures directed
to the previous Findings and agrees that the BCC has fully and completely addressed and implemented the
recommended corrective actions.
19
