READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — October 4, 2013 — October 1, 2013 Regular Meeting — reading text
Part 3 of 4. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 76-October 1_ 2013 Regular Meeting.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Club for a 5K Road Race on October 19, 2013
9. Approval Proclamation designating October 4, 2013 as
Manufacturing Day
10. Approve contract renewal with Economic Development Council
for specialized area marketing services
11. Approve contract extension with Sprint Solutions for
support of Water & Sewer SCADA System
12. Approval to purchase four new ambulances off the Florida
State Sheriff & Fire Bid open to all state and local
agencies for a total cost of $565,400
13. Constantine Engineering Task Order No. 3 for the FY 2014
Sunshine State One-Call of Florida Service
14. Recommendation to award bid for purchase of asphalt for
Road Division to APAC Mid-South, C.W. Roberts Contracting,
and Anderson Columbia
October 1, 2013 -11- Minute Book 70, Page 78
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
15. Approval for staff to provide labor and equipment
assistance to the Division of Forestry for paving segments
of Charles Booker and Corduroy Roads
16. Approval to purchase VoIP hardware from Technology
Integration Group under State Contract for Sheriff's
Office
18. Authorization to advertise for public hearing on October 15
a request by Dawn McArdle to vacate portion of alley in
Block 53 of Port Dixie
5 yeas.
RECESS - The meeting was recessed at 10:06 a.m. and reconvened
at 10:16 a.m.
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE — SHALIMAR ANNEX PROJECT, FINANCIAL DATA
Mr. Don Turner, Facilities Maintenance Director, stated at the
last meeting Board direction was to look more closely at
Option 1 and Option 2 provided by Lord & Son Construction for
the Shalimar Annex project. Option 1 is a new two-story
building of approximately 50,000 square feet. Option 2 is a new
three-story building where the third floor is shelled space only
and consists of approximately 75,000 square feet.
Mr. Turner then made a PowerPoint presentation entitled Capital
Construction Projects Analysis of Financial Data, noting many of
these slides were prepared by former County Administrator Jim
Curry in 2010. He advised that he has updated the information
to reflect 2013 realities. Mr. Turner addressed various
strategies regarding use of space and resultant savings from
termination of leases. County facilities included in the
discussions were the Shalimar Annex, Crestview Courthouse, the
old Fort Walton Beach Hospital, and the old Agriculture
Extension Building which is currently being used for storage.
After Mr. Turner closed with his summary, Mr. Parisot said if
the loan or bond is cut from a 20-year to a 15-year term, the
county will save considerable money. Mr. Boyles told the other
commissioners that his focus is on the facility they are sitting
in right now, the Crestview Courthouse. He said it is the
oldest county-owned building, built in the 1950s, and has not
been slated for modification. Mr. Boyles listed the many
problem areas of the building which need to be addressed. He
recommended an amendment to the contract with Lord & Son and Dag
Architects to include analysis of the Crestview Courthouse and
requested staff place this item on the next meeting agenda.
October 1, 2013 -12- Minute Book 70, Page 79
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Mr. Amunds asked if a great deal of money should be put into the
old Fort Walton Beach Hospital. He outlined his ideas which
included putting the Sheriff’s Office in a new building and
allocating $750,000 to § 1 Million for work on the Crestview
Courthouse. Mr. Amunds said he does not want it to look like
only a token amount is being considered for North County. Mr.
Boyles remarked, “Yet, it does.” He said we tell the North end
this is how much we will give you, deal with it. Mr. Boyles
stated this is very frustrating. Mr. Amunds asked about cost
savings and Mr. Boyles replied cost savings were not part of the
discussion when the new Courthouse Annex Extension was built for
$23 Million. Mr. Amunds clarified the figure he gave for the
Courthouse project was a ballpark figure and for the record he
did not support construction of the $23 Million facility in
South County.
Mr. Harris commented that when he tried to bring up this issue
on the Crestview Courthouse before, he was asked to resign. He
also acknowledged that the Courthouse is in Mr. Boyles district
and not his. Mr. Harris expressed concern that dollars are
thrown at one location and pennies at another. He stated that
his plan a few years ago was to split the $23 Million between
North and South County but all the money was spent in the south
location. Mr. Harris said we now have an opportunity to look at
funding not only for renovations/new construction in Shalimar
but for the Courthouse. He underscored the fact this is the
county seat and should be a shining example. Mr. Harris stated
he supports Mr. Boyles’ position and would like to see a full or
partial reclamation of the Crestview Courthouse. Mr. Boyles
said he is looking for options at the Courthouse without a
dollar limit being set.
Mr. Windes said he stands with Mr. Boyles on this, adding he is
not interested in a patch job. He supported an analysis to see
what is needed and how much it will cost. Mr. Windes felt Mr.
Boyles and Mr. Harris have made good points.
Mr. Parisot reviewed the issues associated with renovations of
the Shalimar Annex, including the reverter clause litigation.
He was of the opinion that renovating the Annex would be cost
prohibitive and the option of constructing a new facility on the
site is more prudent. Mr. Parisot then stated he believes the
Board should terminate the contract with Lord & Son because it
was for renovation of the facility and not new construction. He
said if the Board decides to go with a new building, he would
like for that work to be re-bid with hopes of getting a lower
October 1, 2013 -13- Minute Book 70, Page go
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
price on the project. Mr. Parisot stressed that he does not
support renovation of the Annex facility in any shape, form or
fashion. He expressed a desire for the County Attorney and
Purchasing Director to review the current contract with Lord &
son.
Mr. Amunds asked if the direction is to continue to work on the
concept of a new building at the Shalimar Annex site and to
support Mr. Boyles and the Crestview Courthouse task force with
no strings attached with regard to a dollar amount. He asked if
the preliminary drawings for the Shalimar facility should be
reviewed. Mr. Amunds also mentioned that he had spoken with
Colonel Bud Day’s family and the possibility of the new building
being called the Veterans Building in honor of Colonel Day and
all veterans. He felt if this happens, the Veterans Service
Office should be moved from the old hospital to the new
building. Mr. Amunds again questioned the feasibility of
pouring more money into the old Fort Walton Beach Hospital.
Mr. Boyles commented there is much ground being covered here
today. He said he believes it is fair to say the majority of
the Board is looking at a new building in Shalimar. Mr. Boyles
said that brings us to a point to ask who will be in the
building and how large it should be. He asked if there is a
proposal to move everyone out of the old hospital, to which Mr.
Amunds replied only the Veterans Service Office. Mr. Harris
said, “I think that is premature.”
Mr. Boyles said Mr. Turner needs to know what the Board expects
of him and it is unfair not to give him clear instruction.
Discussion ensued ‘regarding Option 1 for a new two-story
building or Option 2 for a new three-story building with the
third floor as shelled space. Mr. Parisot stated there is only
a $400,000 difference between Option 1 and Option 2 and he
supports Option 2. Mr. Windes and Mr. Harris agreed. Mr.
Windes said next time he would prefer to have all the options on
one sheet for easier comparison. Mr. Harris said the emphasis
should be on a three-story building in Shalimar and any work at
the old hospital can wait until the Crestview Courthouse is
renovated.
Mr. Boyles said the consensus does seem to have a new Shalimar
building from the ground up with three stories. We will work
through the process of shelling and build out on the third
floor. Another topic was scrapping the existing contract. He
stated direction needs to be provided on that subject. Mr.
October 1, 2013 -14- Minute Book 70, Page 81
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Boyles said an option to re-bidding for a contractor is to have
another party analyze the numbers and give their opinion on the
costs.
Mr. Windes stated he disagrees with Mr. Parisot’s position and
has reservations about starting over on a new contract. He
pointed out that he spoke with Lord & Son representatives
several times and it is understood Lord & Son is the contractor
of record. Mr. Windes saying the idea of terminating the
contract and rebidding is a “big curve ball.”
Mr. Harris stated he agrees with Mr. Windes and he also likes
Mr. Boyles’ perspective of getting a second opinion on projected
costs. Mr. Turner pointed out this is a design-build contract.
he said the original direction was renovation but the Board can
direct the contractor what to do. Mr. Parisot read from the
contract document.
Mr. Amunds stated we cannot go further without deciding the size
of the building. He reiterated his earlier understanding is the
Support is for a new three-story building in Shalimar and
support for Mr. Boyles to work on proposed renovations to the
Crestview Courthouse. Upon inquiry by Mr. Turner, Mr. Amunds
said his recommendation is to the leave the old hospital as it
is. Discussion ensued regarding the ability to keep the roof
from leaking and closing off unused areas.
Mr. Hofstad said staff needs an opportunity to evaluate the
issues which have been brought up today. The direction is to
look at a new three-story building in Shalimar with the third
floor shelled out to provide additional office space. He again
stated staff will need time to evaluate the space needs and said
a report will be provided at the October 15 meeting.
WATER & SEWER - TASK ORDER NO. 2 WITH CONSTANTINE ENGINEERING
Mr. Jeff Littrell, Water & Sewer System Director, requested
approval of Task Order No. 2 with Constantine Engineering for FY
2014 general professional engineering services at a not-to-
exceed cost of $75,000. Mr. Harris made motion, seconded by Mr.
Boyles, to approve this task order. 5 yeas.
PURCHASING - TASK ORDER ASSIGNMENTS
Mr. Richard Brannon, Purchasing Director, stated a number of
contracts expired at the end of September but have outstanding
October 1, 2013 -15- Minute Book 70, Page 82
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
task orders which will continue past today’s date (ten firms
with 44 task orders). He said this is a unique situation and
staff has tried to come up with language to allow payment of the
final bills. Mr. Brannon recommended that each affected
contract be amended and extended to reflect the assigned task
orders will be completed as written and paid at the rates
established under the original master contract for which the
task orders were written. No new work will be assigned to the
amended contract and the master contract will expire when the
assigned task orders are completed. This verbiage has been
reviewed by the Finance Department, Contracts and Grants, and
the affected departments. Mr. Brannon pointed out there may be
task orders on long-term projects which will extend beyond
Fiscal Year 2014. Mr. Dowd stated he has reviewed the language
and said “It is fine with me.”
Mr. Parisot commented this year has brought new issues and felt
they could be attributed to the Auditor General’s report and new
procedures implemented in the Finance Department. Mr. Stanford
concurred. Mr. Parisot asked if language could be inserted in
new contracts to avoid this problem. Mr. Hofstad said he
believes the language and action proposed by the Purchasing
Department will accomplish this. He underscored the fact that
many of the projects
