READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — October 7, 2014 — FOY SHAW SCOPE OF SERVICES_PHASE II DESIGN — reading text
Part 1 of 7. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 154-FOY SHAW SCOPE OF SERVICES_PHASE II DESIGN.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
EXHIBIT A2
PHASE II - SCOPE OF SERVICES
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES HIGHWAY DESIGN
Foy Shaw Industrial Parkway at Bob Sikes Airport
Crestview, FL
Okaloosa County and the Florida Department of Transportation propose the
construction of a new north/south connector roadway between US Highway 90 and
John Givens Road to the west, south of the Bob Sikes Airport (CEW) RW in Crestview,
Florida.
This Exhibit forms an integral part of the agreement between Okaloosa County
(hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY) and HDR Engineering (hereinafter referred to
as the CONSULTANT) relative to the proposed transportation facility.
1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities
of the CONSULTANT and the COUNTY in connection with the design and
preparation of a complete set of construction contract plans and special provisions,
if necessary, for:
The construction of the Foy Shaw Industrial Parkway connector roadway between
US Highway 90 and John Givens Road to the west, south of the Bob Sikes Airport
(CEW) RW in Crestview, Florida.
Known alternative construction contracting methods include:
The general objective is for the CONSULTANT to prepare a set of plans to be used
by the contractor to build the project, and by the COUNTY to ensure the project is
built as designed and to specifications. Elements of work shall include preliminary
planning, NEPA studies, roadways, geotechnical activities, surveys, drainage,
signing and pavement markings, utility relocation, maintenance of traffic, cost
estimates, environmental permits, quantity computation book, and necessary
incidental items for a complete project.
The Scope of Services establishes which items of work described in the FDOT
Plans Preparation Manual and other pertinent manuals to accomplish the work are
specifically included in this contract, and also which of the items of work will be the
responsibility of the CONSULTANT or the COUNTY.
Plans and design documents are to be prepared with Standard English values in
accordance with applicable COUNTY/FDOT manuals and guidelines.
The CONSULTANT shall be aware that as a project is developed, certain
modifications and/or improvements to the original recommendation may be
required. The CONSULTANT is to incorporate these refinements into the design
and will consider this effort to be an anticipated and integral part of the work. This
will not be a basis for any supplemental fee request(s).
The CONSULTANT shall demonstrate good project management practices while
working on this project. These include communication with the COUNTY and others
as necessary, management of time and resources, and documentation. The
CONSULTANT shall set up and maintain throughout the design of the project a
contract file in accordance with COUNTY procedures. It shall be the
CONSULTANT’s responsibility to utilize the very best engineering judgment,
practices, and principles possible during the prosecution of the work commissioned
under this contract.
The COUNTY will provide contract administration, management services, and
technical reviews of work associated with the development and preparation of the
contract plans. The COUNTY will provide job-specific information and/or functions
as outlined in this contract.
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
From the Phase I – NEPA Environmental Assessment, the CONSULTANT shall use
the approved concepts as a basis for the design unless otherwise directed by the
COUNTY.
This project primarily consists of the construction a new 2-lane roadway (Foy Shaw
Industrial Parkway) from US Highway 90 to John Givens Road to the west and
Fairchild Road to the east, south of the Bob Sikes Airport. The new roadway typical
section will consist of a rural typical section with 1-12’ travel lanes and 8’ shoulders
(5’ paved), separated by a 22’ grassed median.
The post speed limit on Foy Shaw Industrial Parkway will be 35 mph. The
CONSULTANT shall determine the appropriate Design Speed required for the
facility.
Necessary Geotechnical efforts will be provided by the CONSULTANT.
This project will be let to construction as a Conventional Bid Item project.
The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the following into the design of this facility:
2.1 Roadway (Activities 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0)
Public Involvement: This item will be handled under the Phase I – NEPA
Environmental Assessment portion of the scope of work.
Plan Type: The CONSULTANT shall provide roadway plans and any other
plan type required for this project. This will also include miscellaneous
details to construct this project.
Limits: Foy Shaw Industrial Parkway from US Highway 90 to John Givens
Road.
Typical Section: The new roadway typical section will consist of a rural typical
section with 1-12’ travel lanes and 8’ shoulders (5’ paved), separated by a
22’ grassed median.
Pavement Design: The CONSULTANT will be responsible for providing the
pavement design. Only one pavement design is anticipated.
Access Management Classification: This project has a FDOT Access
Management Classification of 3.
Level of TCP Plans: The CONSULTANT shall provide a FDOT TCP Level I.
Traffic Control Plans (TCP) will be required for this project. The FDOT
Design Standards, 600 series, should be utilized for work being performed on
or adjacent to existing roadways. A reduction in the number of lanes may
require that a lane closure analysis be performed by the CONSULTANT
2.2 Drainage (Activity 6.0)
Expected systems include cross drains, roadway ditches, outfalls and
stormwater management facilities where feasible.
The CONSULTANT shall identify and study alternative pond sites for each
basin. The alternative pond sites shall be within the right-of-way footprint
that was studied in the Phase I – NEPA Environmental Assessment.
The CONSULTANT shall identify and evaluation the need for proposed cross
drains.
2.3 Utilities Coordination (Activity 7.0)
The CONSULTANT will be responsible for utility coordination associated with
this project.
The CONSULTANT will identify utilities in the corridor during the survey
phase by calling Sunshine State One-Call of Florida (SSOCOF) and shall
coordinate with each company to verify that existing utilities are designated in
the field prior to completing the topographic survey. The CONSULTANT will
be responsible for showing areas that may be affected by construction. The
CONSULTANT will evaluate utilities for potential impacts and prepare a
Utility Conflict Matrix. The Consultant is to review the Utility Work Schedules
and assure that they are compatible with the plans.
Based on preliminary investigations, the following companies have utilities
within the vicinity of the project:
Auburn Water System
Century Link
Cox Communications
City of Crestview
Gulf Power
Okaloosa Gas
Okaloosa Water and Sewer
AT&T
Fairpoint Communications
Level 3 Communications
Southern Light
2.4 Permits (Activity 8.0)
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with appropriate agencies for necessary
permits, including, but not limited to, Northwest Florida Water Management
District, Department of Environmental Protection, United States Fish and
Wildlife, Florida Fish and Wildlife, and US Army Corps of Engineers.
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the identification, coordination
and applications for permits necessary to construct this project. Application
and processing fees associated with said permit(s) and activities shall be
paid for by the CONSULTANT.
The COUNTY will direct use of mitigation site or Florida Statutes.
2.5 Structures (Activities 9.0-18.0) Not applicable to this project)
2.6 Signing and Pavement Markings (Activity 19.0 & 20.0)
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design, details, and
quantities associated with signing and pavement markings for this project.
The CONSULTANT shall evaluate signage and way finding in order to
effectively direct vehicular traffic from I-10 and SR 85 to Foy Shaw Industrial
Parkway.
2.7 Signals (Not applicable to this project)
2.8 Lighting (Not applicable to this project)
2.9 Landscape Architecture (Not applicable to this project)
2.10 Survey (Activity 27.0)
Design Survey: The CONSULTANT will provide the Primary and Secondary
Horizontal and Vertical control along with other design survey requirements
in accordance with Section 27.0 of this document.
Subsurface Utility: The CONSULTANT will provide any subsurface utility
excavations that are required for the project.
Right of Way Survey: The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the Right-of-
Way Survey.
2.11 Photogrammetry (Not applicable to this project)
2.12 Mapping (Activity 29.0) (Optional Service)
Control Survey Map: The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the Control
Survey Map, if required.
Right-of-Way Map: The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the Right-of-
Way Map, if required.
2.13 Geotechnical (Activity 30.0)
The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the Pavement Design.
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for necessary geotechnical activities
associated with this project.
The Consultant will collect appropriate samples for Limerock Bearing Ratio
(LBR) testing.
The Consultant will collect appropriate samples for Resilient Modulus (MR)
Testing.
2.14 Architecture (Not applicable to this project)
2.15 Noise Barriers (Not applicable to this project)
2.16 Intelligent Transportation Systems (Not applicable to this project)
2.17 Project Schedule
Within ten (10) days after the Notice-To-Proceed, and prior to the
CONSULTANT beginning work, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed
project activity/event schedule for COUNTY and CONSULTANT scheduled
activities required to meet the current COUNTY Production Date. The
schedule shall be based upon the durations and schedule negotiated during
the project staff hour negotiations process. The schedule shall be
accompanied by an anticipated payout and fiscal progress curve. For the
purpose of scheduling, the CONSULTANT shall allow for a two (2) week
review time for each phase review and other submittals as appropriate.
The schedule shall indicate required submittals.
Fees and price proposals are to be based on the negotiated schedule of 10
months for final plans production. However, the contract deadline is 48
months from the Notice to Proceed.
2.18 Submittals
Microstation will be used for design and drafting of this project. AutoCAD
files can be delivered to the COUNTY at the completion of the project upon
request.
Plans will be prepared on 11X17 plan sheets.
The anticipated printing and submittal requirements for the project include
the listed items below; however, this list of items may not be all inclusive on
project needs. This summation of submittal components will be used for
estimating purposes. The DEPARTMENT's Design Project Manager will
determine the specific number of phase review submittals and submittal
requirements for each project.
