READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 08-22-2007 special agenda — reading text
Part 13 of 47. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13623-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
budget ordinances,
and are a common practice in many Florida cities.
The Ft. Walton Beach General Employees' Retirement Plan is reasonably well- funded.
The Ft. Walton Beach plan compares favorably to general employee pension plans in
18 other small to medium size Florida cities in terms of current cost ( required
contributions) and funded ratio.
It appears that the Advisory Committee was originally intended to act as a liaison
between the Board of Trustees ( City Council) and employees, and make disability
determinations. These functions are entirely appropriate for a committee made up of
employees. There isnothingin the plan to suggest that the Advisory Committee should
be performing investment- related functions. However, it appears that the Advisory
Committee has become involved in investment activities. If the City Council determines
that it is advisable for an advisory committee to perform investment- related functions,
there are several options for restructuring the committee.
A " fixed" City contribution rate is contrary to Florida law. The City cannot " fix" a
contribution rate that is less than the annual required contribution, which varies from
year to year.
1
Page 23
There are a number ofoptions that the City may wish to consider for reducing
retirement costs by restructuring or replacing the existing City retirement plan. These
options include:
1. Close the existing City plan to new members and establish a defined contribution
plan for future hires.
2. Close the existing City plan to new members and join the Florida Retirement
System ( FRS).
3. Terminate the existing City plan, and join FRS or establish a defined contribution
plan for all employees.
4. Close the existing City retirement plan to new members, and create a new
defined benefit plan with benefits based on a target contribution rate.
5. Freeze existing plan benefits for current members; adjust benefits for future
hires.
2
Page 24
Current Status of the General Emplovees' Retirement Fund
The actuarial valuation report for the 2006- 07 fiscal year, prepared in March 2007
based on data as of 10/ 1/ 06), reflects the following:
Membership
232 active members
103 retired members and beneficiaries ( now receiving benefits)
Assets/ Liabilities
Assets of $ 29.449 million ( actuarial value)
Actuarial accrued liability of $33. 885 million
Unfunded actuarial accrued liability of $ 4.436 million
Funded Ratio
A funded ratio of 87% ( assets divided by actuarial accrued liability)
Required Contributions (2006- 07 fiscal year)
City - 15.95% of payroll ($ 1. 3 million)
Employees - 5% of payroll ($ 385, 782)
Total Required Contribution - 20. 95% of payroll ($ 1. 6million)
Comparison With Other City Pension Plans
The chart on the following page compares the Ft. Walton Beach General Employees'
Retirement Fund with general employee pension plans in 18 other small to medium size
Florida cities. The chart shows the population of each city, the number of active
members, total required contributions, city contributions, and the funded ratio for each
Walton Beach
plan. The chart is intended to provide a context for evaluating the Ft.
and funded status of a
plan. Obviously there are many factors that can affect the cost
pension plan that are not reflected in the chart. The chart shows that the Ft. Walton
Beach plan compares favorably to most of the other city plans in terms of contributions
and funded ratio. Specifically:
15 of the 18 other cities have greater total required contributions than Ft. Walton
Beach; only 3 cities have lower total required contributions
13 of the 18 other cities have greater city contributions than Ft. Walton Beach;
only 5 cities have lower city contributions
Only 2 of the 18 other cities have a funded ratio that is better than Ft. Walton
Beach ( one other city is the same)
3
Page 25
0--
1 E
o
E o '#. '#. g
o '#.
o.!!! t
0
o 1.0 0 -:: c:
C IIS- 0> LO CO
I'- I'- J:"'- I'-
LO "":
Q)-' O
LO
I'-
I'-
N
O~ t N N~ O> CO COL .s
I) COco
COLO o I'- LOI'--.;;
CO"'- co CO CO I'-
I'-
CO-g
C~(
cg: 2 0>
r--.
co COI'- CO CO
ra
J UI CJ
ra
LL .!. ~
I: :
I
0
co
c:
I o
C C_ 0
Q) 0
0=
0
J.......
J>>
LO r---
CIIS LOO> tO"": O> COCO~ NO
O-::
J:~~
Q) ._ C.
t('i)
CO-.;; LO
C"')CO
1.0
i)
NO>
I'-
roLO"'-",,:-.;; NNI'- C"')O
COLOcO"'-
N
i)...-
CO N...-...-...- N
NC"')
NN...- ...- N...-...-(' N...-
O~ E
Q)
30- E
L-.... L-....
Q)
a::
C
z Q) C_ o
0 ~ c:
o
en
J;...
J>>
oo
C"::::: 1.0
2 Q),CIIS C. 01'-"'-
0>
OCO~ LO",,: o>...-..
