READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — January 8, 2013 — Jan 15 2013 RESTORE Workshop — reading text
Part 1 of 2. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 46-Jan 15 2013 RESTORE Workshop.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
January 15, 2013
RESTORE Act Workshop
A workshop for updates on the RESTORE Act was called to order at
6:00 p.m. at the Water & Sewer Administration Building in Fort
Walton Beach. Members present were Don Amunds, Chairman; Dave
Parisot, Vice Chairman; Wayne Harris; Nathan Boyles; and Kelly
Windes. Also present were Gary Stanford, Finance Officer,
Clerk’s Office; John Dowd, County Attorney; Jim Curry, County
Administrator; and members of the press.
Mr. Amunds thanked everyone for their attendance at tonight’s
workshop. He stated Mr. Parisot will begin with a PowerPoint
presentation, then the floor will be opened for public
commentary. Mr. Amunds said this is an important subject and
encouraged citizen participation. However, if the comments
become redundant, he advised he will close that portion of the
meeting. After public comments, the Board will discuss
establishing a RESTORE Advisory Committee.
Mr. Parisot opened his presentation with a brief review of some
of the various funding programs which have resulted from the
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. He thanked T. J. Marshall of the
Ocean Conservancy for providing the updated slide entitled “Flow
of Oil Spill Funds in Florida.” Mr. Parisot provided a detailed
explanation of this chart beginning with how the $4 Billion
criminal penalty against BP would be divided, more particularly
the portion which will go into the RESTORE Act Gulf Coast
Restoration Trust Fund.
Although not outlined on the slides, Mr. Parisot stated there is
another program managed by the Florida Department of Economic
Opportunity which provides $10 Million for economic development
and job creation each year for three years. This program is now
in its second year and is being called the “10-10-10 Program.”
Mr. Parisot continued his explanation of the flow chart,
outlining the various pots of money. The revised eight-county
formula for distribution of Pot 1 monies was approved by the
Okaloosa County Board of Commissioners on December 18, 2012 and
supported by Resolution No. 12-208. He noted that as of today
seven of the eight counties have adopted the eight-county
resolution regarding the formula. The next two slide listed
allowable activities for Pot 1 monies and how projects and
programs are to be selected.
January 15, 2013 -1- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Topics on the next series of slides included:
• Short Term Task which included developing a county RESTORE
Multi-Year Plan and establishing an Okaloosa RESTORE
Advisory Committee
• Multi-Year Implementation Plan
• RESTORE Timeline
Mr. Parisot stated the most controversial slide deals with
composition of the advisory committee. The Board must decide
how many members will sit on this committee and what groups they
will represent.
Mr. Curry stated the second item on the agenda is Multi-year
Plan Development. He felt the advisory committee should
participate in the plan development. Mr. Curry pointed out the
U.S. Treasury is currently promulgating rules. He underscored
the importance of having a multi-year plan in place. Mr. Curry
advised that in discussions with his counterparts throughout the
state, he has learned most counties will hire a consulting
company to assist with development of the plan and to aid the
advisory committee. He reiterated the importance of having a
plan in place before the dollars begin to flow and recommended
the plan be ready by June.
Mr. Amunds said he does not feel it is necessary to review 20 or
30 pages outlining what neighboring counties are doing (Item #3
on the agenda). He asked staff to display the flow chart he
prepared on the composition of the advisory committee. Mr.
Amunds proposed a seven-member committee consisting of two
commissioners, two representatives of the cities, one member
each representing the education, economic, and environmental
sectors of the county. He also envisioned three sub-
groups/working groups under the Education, Economic, and
Environmental categories.
Upon inquiry by Mr. Parisot, Mr. Dowd said he does not believe
the working groups would be under the Sunshine Law provisions
because they would not make recommendations directly to the
Board. Mr. Parisot had also provided a possible committee
composition in his presentation. One option was for a seven-
member committee consisting of a representative from the League
of Cities, the Chambers of Commerce, the School Board, Tourism,
the Economic Development Council, the environmental community,
and the Work Force Development Board. A nine-member proposal
January 15, 2013 -2- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
would add an additional representative from the cities and the
Chambers of Commerce.
Mr. Harris, Mr. Windes, and Mr. Boyles stated they will reserve
comment until after the public has an opportunity to address
this subject.
Mr. Mike Anderson, Fort Walton Beach, asked if staff will still
provide input to the advisory committee if a consultant is
hired. Mr. Amunds replied in the affirmative. Mr. Anderson
questioned why commissioners should be on the advisory committee
when that committee will report to the Board. He also
recommended the commissioners have no voting privileges on the
advisory committee.
Mrs. Rebecca Sherry, Okaloosa Island, requested appointment to
the advisory committee. She recommended the funds coming into
the county be used to lower ad valorem taxes. Mrs. Sherry urged
caution on preselecting categories from which to choose the
committee members. Mrs. Sherry listed her qualifications. She
also advocated for maximum transparency, saying the working
groups should not be exempted from Sunshine Law requirements.
Destin Mayor Sam Seevers thanked the commissioners for the great
detail which has gone into this issue. She noted that everyone
will not get what they want. Mayor Seevers referred to the
proposal to have the municipalities represented by two
individuals, saying she is hopeful there would be a person from
North County and one from South County. As in the previous
RESTORE Act workshop, she requested the League of Cities be
allowed to choose their representatives.
Mayor Seevers questioned one of the proposed committee
compositions which had two county commissioners on it. She
believed this could be a violation of the Sunshine Law for the
Board to have two voting members on the committee. Mayor
Seevers stressed the importance of having individuals from
different aspects of the community on the committee.
Mr. Amunds asked Mr. Dowd if it would be a violation of the
Sunshine Law for two commissioners to serve on this committee if
the meeting was properly announced/advertised. Mr. Dowd said he
misunderstood the chart and thought Mr. Amunds was recommending
two appointments by the BCC. Mr. Amunds said it could be
reduced to one commissioner. Mr. Harris said this should be an
January 15, 2013 -3- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
advisory committee and did not feel a commissioner could
maintain objectivity if he was on it.
Mr. Parisot stated there is a misconception the funding will act
like a grant program. He said just because someone submits an
application does not mean they will receive funding. Mr.
Parisot pronounced funding must follow an established procedure
with competitive bidding and task order approvals.
Ms. Judy Stokes, Mary Esther Drive, asked how much of the money
will go to infrastructure repair. Mr. Amunds replied that
information is unknown at present. Ms. Stokes asked about
repair of the older water pipes in Mary Esther. Mr. Amunds said
he cannot answer for the city. She then asked about a grant for
the city to repair the water lines. Mr. Harris and Mr. Amunds
both told her there will be no grants.
Mr. Dennis Mitchell, Laurel Hill, spoke about the number of
committee members. He said 40 different groups have been
identified with interest in being on the committee or in a sub-
group. He felt nothing would get done if there are too many
people on this committee.
Mr. Dowd asked if the Board is going to make a decision on
hiring a consultant to assist the advisory committee. Mr.
Amunds answered that he wants to hear from the other
commissioners and see if there is a consensus.
Mr. Boyles asked if the Board can fund a position to be
dedicated solely to this work. He posed questions on where the
money to support administration of the program would come from.
Mr. Amunds stated up to 3% of the monies can be used for
administrative purposes. Mr. Parisot said Pot 1 is silent on
administration costs but Pots 2 and 3 do allow 3% for
administration. He added there appears to be no limits on
hiring a consultant. Mr. Parisot reported there is still some
question on whether you would be reimbursed for any expenditures
made before the funds are actually disbursed. Mr. Curry agreed
this is a gray area and they hope to have an answer very soon.
He again encouraged having a plan and the advisory committee in
place by June. Mr. Curry said if the Board gives the nod to a
RFP for consulting services, staff could begin preparation and
return it to the Board for review before any funds are spent
and, hopefully, he will have an answer to the question of
reimbursements.
January 15, 2013 -4- Minute Book 68, Page
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Mr. Curry said he does not believe everyone understands the
magnitude of how this will impact Okaloosa County. He felt it
important to bring in expertise for preparation of the plan so
there is no push back from the Federal Government. Upon inquiry
by Mr. Boyles, Mr. Curry said preparation of a RFP for a
consulting firm will not be done alone. He explained that he
has regular conference calls with FAC and other counties and we
will all work together on preparation of the RFP. Upon further
inquiry by Mr. Boyles, Mr. Curry said selection of the
consultant would be based more on qualifications than costs.
Mr. Harris stated that he is not as optimistic as others that we
will get the money. He felt higher levels of government may
intercept those funds. Mr. Harris said he believes we are still
in the planning stage and that no commissioners should be on the
advisory committee. He was of the opinion that it is too soon
to make decisions on the committee but felt a committee should
consist of five to seven members and no more than 11. Mr.
Harris stated great caution must be taken in selection of these
committee members and he believes it is too soon to select them
tonight. He added that he supports a RFP to hire a consultant.
Mr. Windes said he does not think commissioners should be on the
committee and suggested those two slots be filled with a
representative from the fishing and seafood industries and one
from lodging and resorts. He agreed with Mr. Harris that 11
members would be too many on the committee and that he is
prepared to make a motion to prepare a RFP for a consultant.
Mr. Dowd said motions are not normally made during a workshop.
Mr. Curry responded staff can take Board direction by consensus.
Mr. Windes suggested this item be placed under Old Business for
discussion and action at the next meeting.
Mr. Parisot stated that he supports hiring a consultant. With
regard to the size of the advisory committee, he said he would
like to look at 7 or 9 members with no commissioners on it. He
felt it important to keep politics out of it and suggested no
members serving on the Tourist Development Council be considered
for the lodging and resort industries position. Mr. Parisot
supported a representative from the schools. He explained his
rationale for putting someone from EDC on the committee to take
