READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — March 17, 2015 — 76127 economic evaluation of florida s investment in beaches — reading text
Part 6 of 6. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
76127 economic evaluation of florida s investment in beaches — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
consumption of fixed capital (CFC), and intermediate purchases of goods and services less
sales to other sectors and own-account production of structures and software. It excludes current
transactions of government enterprises, interest paid or received by government, and subsidies.
Real Output (Fixed 2009 $(M)) – Consists of sales, or receipts, and other operating income, plus
commodity taxes and changes in inventories.
Total Employment (Jobs) – This comprises estimates of the number of jobs, full time plus part time, by
place of work. Full time and part time jobs are counted at equal weight. Employees, sole proprietors,
and active partners are included, but unpaid family workers and volunteers are not included.
Population (Persons) – Reflects first of year estimates of people, includes survivors from the previous
year, births, special populations, and three types of migrants (economic, international, and retired)
21
APPENDIX D: ADDITIONAL STORM DAMAGE RESOURCES
Below is an excerpt from the State of Florida Long-Range Financial Outlook for Fiscal Years 2015-16
through 2017-18:
State Costs for Hurricanes, the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, and Citizen’s Property Insurance
Florida’s financial stability is vulnerable to the potential impacts of natural disasters, especially major
hurricanes. This vulnerability can take several different forms, but one of the most immediate is to the
state’s long-term financial health.
After the 2004 and 2005 hurricanes, the Legislative Office of Economic and Demographic Research
undertook an in-depth analysis of the revenue and budgetary impact on state government from weather
events of this magnitude. Popular belief has spread the misconception that hurricanes are somehow
beneficial to the state from an economic perspective. However, the reality is much more complicated.
From past events, there appear to be four distinct phases of activity related to hurricanes—each of which
has unique economic responses. The table on the following page details the unique effect of each phase.
Contrary to the oft-repeated myth that government makes money during hurricanes, state government
typically has expenditures greater than the incremental increase in the revenue estimate and becomes a
net loser when all expenditures are taken into account. In reviewing the final impact of the 2004 and
2005 hurricanes, after the state’s hurricane-related expenditures are subtracted from the estimated
additional revenues, the bottom line for both years was clearly negative. This means that the state had
to spend more than the generated revenues.
22
Hurricanes: Economic Phases
Phase Defining Characteristics Statewide Economic Consequences
Preparatory Phase Purchase of Emergency Supplies Demand...Localized increase in demand
(approximately 72 hours (canned food, batteries, radios, for specific items, and potential non-
in advance of the candles, flashlights, charcoal, gas, affected area increase in lodging
hurricane to landfall) demand, but largely undetectable
propane, water, ice, shutters,
boards / plywood, etc.) State Budget...Shifting of costs from
Evacuation Expenses normally provided services to
o In-State...hotels and lodging, emergency management, as well as
transport costs like rental unanticipated overtime and shelter
cars and gas costs
o Out-of-State...leakage
State Revenues...Slight uptick, but
largely undetectable
Crisis Phase Rescue and relief efforts (largely Demand...Localized decrease in overall
(landfall to several public, charitable, or free) demand; significance depends on the
weeks after landfall) Roads closed due to debris event
Private structures and public
State Budget...Government agencies
infrastructure damaged provide goods and services and incur
Utility disruptions new expenditures that may or may not
Businesses and non-essential parts be matched at a later time by the
of government closed federal government
Temporary homelessness
State Revenues...Detectable downtick;
Violence and looting significance depends on the event
Recovery Phase Increased spending related to Demand...Localized increase in overall
(subsequent to the Crisis deductibles, repair, and demand, and prices likely increase for
Phase and generally replacement some items
lasting up to two or
o Private Savings / Loans
three years) Employment...Will temporarily see
o State Spending gains as relief and recovery workers
o FEMA and Federal Spending move into the area
o Insurance Payments
Competition for scarce resources State Budget...Reallocation of state and
(contractors, roofers, supplies, local government spending to the
affected area
construction workers, building
materials, debris removal, etc.)
State Revenues...Discernible and
significant uptick
Displacement Phase Reduction in normal purchasing Demand...Localized decrease in overall
(subsequent to the behavior for items that were demand, but largely undetectable at the
Recovery Phase and bought or replaced ahead of state level
lasting from two to
schedule
six years) State Revenues...Slight downtick, but
Demographic and labor shifts largely undetectable
related to dislocated households
and economic centers
23
